Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mel Gibson hits back at 'vicious' critics of Christ film
news.telegraph.co.uk ^ | September 10 2003 | Marcus Warren

Posted on 09/10/2003 3:43:55 PM PDT by sydney smith

Mel Gibson hits back at 'vicious' critics of Christ film By Marcus Warren in New York (Filed: 09/09/2003)

Mel Gibson turned on critics of his film The Passion, about Jesus Christ, over claims that it is anti-Semitic but his language has ignited a new controversy.

The Australian-born actor and director said he was the target of "vehement anti-Christian sentiment" but admitted that the row over his £16 million self-financed film was good publicity.

In one of a series of inflammatory remarks quoted in this week's The New Yorker, Gibson accuses "modern secular Judaism" of trying "to blame the Holocaust on the Roman Catholic Church".

"It's a lie. And it's revisionism," said Gibson, a follower of Traditionalist Catholicism that still performs the Latin Tridentine mass. "And they've been working on that one for a while."

His film, due to be released next Easter but so far without a distributor, has been described as likely to fuel "hatred, bigotry and anti-Semitism" by the Anti-Defamation League and has been criticised by some Roman Catholic theologians.

Its commercial appeal is also open to question as it has been shot entirely in Latin and Aramaic, the everyday language of Jesus and his disciples. It is unclear whether it will be subtitled.

Its director portrays himself as caught up in a huge conflict between "big realms that are warring and battling. You stick your head up and you get knocked," he said.

"I didn't realise it would be so vicious. The acts against this film started early. There is vehement anti-Christian sentiment out there and they don't want it."

Gibson is not averse to dishing out venomous attacks of his own, however, with one target Frank Rich, a New York Times columnist, who implied that Gibson's father was "a Holocaust denier".

"I want to kill him," Gibson said of the columnist. "I want his intestines on a stick. I want to kill his dog."

Gibson said: "He never denied the Holocaust. He just said there were fewer than six million."

As proof of his desire to avoid confrontation, Gibson cited his decision to cut a scene in which Caiaphas says "his blood be on us and on our children" soon after Pontius Pilate washes his hands of the captive Christ.

"I wanted it in," he said. "My brother said I was wimping out if I didn't include it. But, man, if I included that in there, they'd be coming after me at my house. They'd come to kill me."

26 August 2003: Jews fear backlash from Mel Gibson's Passion 6 August 2003: Mel Gibson Christ film is branded anti-Jewish 29 June 2003: Mel Gibson's film on Christ condemned as anti-Semitic 23 January 2003: Gibson brings his passion for Christ to the big screen


TOPICS: Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: antichristian; melgibson; passion
Mel Gibson should be the next pope.
1 posted on 09/10/2003 3:43:56 PM PDT by sydney smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sydney smith
First-
As proof of his desire to avoid confrontation, Gibson cited his decision to cut a scene in which Caiaphas says "his blood be on us and on our children" soon after Pontius Pilate washes his hands of the captive Christ.

By taking out this line, he is telling others they can deny what was said. If he is going to go to the very detail of Our Lord's passion, he must go into detail of what else happened. If the blood was not on their hands, whose was it on?
2 posted on 09/10/2003 4:19:32 PM PDT by sspxsteph (Pope Saint Silverius, Ora Pro Nobis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sspxsteph
I agree. I'm still looking forward to the movie. Life is full of compromises. We do it every day for peace. Some things are better left unsaid. Sometimes.
3 posted on 09/10/2003 4:34:07 PM PDT by sydney smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sydney smith
Article already posted here.
4 posted on 09/10/2003 4:34:42 PM PDT by TotusTuus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TotusTuus
Doh...
5 posted on 09/10/2003 4:35:42 PM PDT by sydney smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sspxsteph
If he is going to go to the very detail of Our Lord's passion, he must go into detail of what else happened.

Perhaps, but a thirty-three-year-long film really doesn't play well in Des Moines.

6 posted on 09/10/2003 4:54:42 PM PDT by Alex Murphy (Athanasius contra mundum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson