Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Supernatural Aim of the Church
In Love with the Church ^ | May 28, 1972 | St. Josemaria Escriva

Posted on 08/29/2003 6:11:19 AM PDT by Hermann the Cherusker

Let me begin by reminding you of something Saint Cyprian tells us: The universal Church is a people which derives its unity from the unity of the Father, of the Son and of the Holy Spirit. It is not out of place therefore to preach about the Church on this feast of the most Blessed Trinity. The Church is rooted in this fundamental mystery of our catholic faith: the mystery of God who is one in essence and three in persons.

The Fathers all see the Church as centred in the Trinity. Look how clearly Saint Augustine puts it: God then dwells in his temple. Not only the Holy Spirit but also the Father and the Son... Therefore, the holy Church is the temple of God, the temple of the entire Trinity.

Next Sunday when we gather again, we will consider another marvellous aspect of the Church. We will fix our attention on the marks of the Church that we will recite in a few moments in the Creed after singing our belief in the Father, in the Son, and in the Holy Spirit: Et in Spiritum Sanctum, we say, and in unam, sanctam, catholicam et apostolicam Ecclesiam. We confess that there is only one Church which is holy, catholic and apostolic.

All those who have truly loved the Church have known how to relate these four marks to the doctrine of the Blessed Trinity, which is the most ineffable mystery of our faith. We believe in the one, holy, catholic and apostolic Church of God, in which we receive the faith. In her we know the Father, Son and Holy Spirit and are baptised in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit.

We need to meditate frequently on the fact that the Church is a deep, great mystery, so that we never forget it. We cannot fully understand the Church on this earth. If men, using only their reason, were to analyse it, they would see only a group of people who abide by certain precepts and think in a similar way. But that would not be the Church.

In the Church we Catholics find our faith, our norms of conduct, our prayer, our sense of fraternity. Through it we are united with all our brothers who have already left this life and are being cleansed in Purgatory — the Church suffering — and with those who already enjoy the beatific vision and love forever the thrice holy God — the Church triumphant. The Church is in our midst and at the same time transcends history. It was born under the mantle of our Lady and continues to praise her on earth and in heaven as its mother.

Let us strengthen our faith in the supernatural character of the Church. Let us profess it with shouts, if necessary, for there are many, physically within the Church and even in high places, who have forgotten these capital truths. They try to propose an image of the Church which is neither holy nor one. Neither would it be apostolic since it is not founded on the rock of Peter. Their substitute is not catholic, because it is riddled with unwarranted irregularities which are mere human caprices.

This is nothing new. Since Jesus Christ Our Lord founded the Church, this Mother of ours has suffered constant persecution. In times past the attacks were delivered openly. Now, in many cases, persecution is disguised. But today, as yesterday, the Church continues to be buffeted from many sides.

Let me say once again that I am not a pessimist by habit or by temperament. How can we be pessimistic if Our Lord has promised that he will be with us until the end of the world?

The effusion of the Holy Spirit upon the Apostles gathered together in the Cenacle provided the first public manifestation of the Church.

Our Father God is a loving Father. To help us understand this, Scripture graphically tells us that he takes care of us like the apple of his eye. He never ceases to sanctify, through the Holy Spirit, the Church founded by his beloved Son. But the Church is going through difficult moments. Confused shouting is heard on all sides, and all the errors which have occurred in the course of the centuries are reappearing with great fanfare.

Faith. We need faith. If we look with the eyes of faith, we will see that the Church carries within herself the explanation for her existence and purpose. Anyone who contemplates her with eyes filled with love for the truth, must recognise that, quite independently of those who are her members and the ways in which the reality that is the Church is expressed in the material world, she carries within herself a unique and universal message of light, which is liberating, necessary and divine.

We cannot but help feel sadness invade our soul when we hear heretical voices around us. And that is what they are, for I have never liked euphemisms. We see that the sanctity of marriage and of the priesthood is attacked without fear of rebuke. We see people deny the immaculate conception and the perpetual virginity of our holy mother Mary, along with all the other privileges and gifts with which God adorned her. We see the perpetual miracle of the real presence of Jesus Christ in the Holy Eucharist, the primacy of Peter and even the resurrection of Our Lord put in doubt. How can anyone not feel tempted to sadness? Have confidence, for the Church is incorruptible. The Church will shake if her foundation shifts; but can Christ be moved? As long as Christ remains her immovable base, the Church will remain strong until the end of time.

Just as in Christ there are two natures, both a human and a divine one, so by analogy we can refer to the presence in the Church of human and divine elements. No one can fail to see the human part. The Church, in this world, is for men, who are its raw material. And when we speak of men we speak of freedom, which permits the co-existence of grandeur and meanness, of heroism and failure.

If we were to focus only on the human side of the Church, we would never understand her. We would still be distant from the threshold of her central mystery. Sacred Scripture uses many terms derived from everyday life to describe God's kingdom and its presence among us in the Church. It compares her to a sheepfold, to a flock, to a house, to a seed, to a vine, to a field in which God plants or builds. But one expression stands out and sums up all the rest: the Church is Christ's body.

And his gifts were that some should be apostles, some prophets, some evangelists, some pastors and teachers, for the equipment of the saints, for the work of ministry, for building up the body of Christ. Saint Paul also writes that all of us, though many, are one body in Christ, and individually members of one another. How luminous is our faith! We are all in Christ, for He is the head of the body, the Church.

This is the faith which Christians have always professed. Listen with me to what Saint Augustine tells us: The whole Christ is made up of head and body, a truth which I am sure you know well. The head is our Saviour himself who suffered under Pontius Pilate and now, after his resurrection from among the dead, is seated at the right hand of the Father. And his body is the Church Not this or that church but the Church that is spread throughout the world. Not only the one which exists among the men now living, for those who went before us and those who are to come to the end of the world also belong to it. The entire Church, formed by the assembly of all the faithful since all of them are members of Christ, has Christ as its head. He governs his body from heaven. And although the head is not visible to the body, it is united to it by love.

You should understand now why the visible Church cannot be severed from the invisible. The Church is, at one and the same time, a mystical body and a juridical body. Pope Leo XIII tells us: By the very fact that it is a body, the Church is visible to the eyes. In the visible body of the Church, in the behaviour of men who make it up here on earth, we find weaknesses, vacillations and acts of treason. But that is not the whole Church, nor is it to be confused with this unworthy behaviour. On the other hand, here and now, there is no shortage of generosity, of heroism, of holy lives that make no noise, that are spent with joy in the service of their brothers in the faith and of all souls.

I would also like you to consider that even if human failings were to outnumber acts of valour, the clear undeniable mystical reality of the Church, though unperceived by the senses, would still remain. The Church would still be the Body of Christ, Our Lord himself, the action of the Holy Spirit and the loving presence of the Father.

The Church is, therefore, inseparably human and divine. It is a divine society in origin, and supernatural in its aim and in the means that are directly ordered to this end. But in so far as it is made up of men, it is a human community. It lives and acts in the world, but its goal and strength are not here but in heaven.

It would be a serious mistake to attempt to separate the charismatic Church, supposedly the sole follower of Christ's spirit, from the juridical or institutional Church, the handiwork of men, subject to historical vicissitudes. There is only one Church. Christ founded only one Church which is visible and invisible. It has a hierarchical and organised body and a fundamental structure by divine law, with an intimate supernatural life that animates, sustains and vivifies it.

We cannot fail to recall that when Christ instituted his Church, he did not conceive it or form it in such a way that it would contain a number of generically similar but distinct communities without the bonds that make the Church indivisible and singular... And thus when Jesus spoke of this mystical edifice, he mentions only one Church which he calls his own: 'I will build my Church' (Matt 16:18). Any other one you can imagine outside of this cannot be his true Church since it was not founded by him.

Faith, I repeat. Let us believe more, asking the Blessed Trinity, whose feast we celebrate today, for greater faith. Anything can happen, except for the thrice holy God to abandon his spouse.

In the first chapter of his letter to the Ephesians, Saint Paul affirms that the mystery of God, announced by Christ, is carried out in the Church. God the Father has put all things under his feet and has made him the head over all things for the church, which is his body, the fullness of him who fills all in all. The mystery of God is to set forth in Christ as a plan for the fullness of time, to unite all things in him, things in heaven and things on earth.

It is an inscrutable mystery, of pure gratuitous love. For he chose us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and blameless before him. God's love is limitless. Saint Paul also tells us that our Saviour desires all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth.

This, and no other, is the aim of the Church: the salvation of souls, one by one. For this reason the Father sent his Son, and now I am sending you out in my turn. This is the origin of the command to teach his doctrine and to baptise, so that the most Blessed Trinity may live in men's souls in grace. All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you; and behold, I am with you always, to the close of the age.

In those simple and sublime words that conclude Saint Matthew's gospel we find the obligation to preach the truths of faith, the need for sacramental life, the promise of Christ's continual assistance to his Church. You cannot be faithful to Our Lord if you neglect these supernatural demands: to instruct in Christian faith and morality and to frequent the sacraments. It is with this mandate that Christ founded his Church. Everything else is secondary.

We cannot forget that the Church is not merely a way of salvation; it is the only way. This is not a human opinion, but the express will of Christ: he who believes and is baptized will be saved; but he who does not believe will be condemned. This is why we assert that the Church is a necessary means of salvation. No later than the second century, Origen wrote: If anyone wants to be saved, let him come to this house so that he can obtain salvation... Let no one deceive himself: outside of this house, that is outside of the Church, no one will be saved. Of the deluge, Saint Cyprian says: If someone had escaped outside of Noah's ark then we would admit that someone who abandoned the Church might escape condemnation.

Extra Ecclesiam, nulla salus. That is the continual warning of the Fathers. Outside the Catholic Church you can find everything except salvation, Saint Augustine admits. You can have honour and sacraments: you can sing 'alleluia' and respond 'amen' You can uphold the gospel, have faith in the Father, in the Son, and in the Holy Spirit, and preach that faith. But never, except in the catholic Church, can you find salvation.

Nonetheless, as Pius XII lamented little more than twenty years ago, some reduce to an empty formula the need to pertain to the true Church in order to obtain eternal salvation. This dogma of faith is at the root of the Church's co-redemptive activity. It spells out the Christian's grave apostolic responsibility. Among Christ's express commandments is the categorical one to incorporate ourselves in his Mystical Body by Baptism. And our Saviour not only commanded that everyone enter the Church, but also established that the Church be the means of salvation, without which no one can reach the kingdom of celestial glory.

It is a matter of faith that anyone who does not belong to the Church will not be saved; and anyone who is not baptized does not enter the Church. Justification cannot take place after the promulgation of the gospel, without Baptism or its desire, the Council of Trent established.

This is a continual demand of the Church which on the one hand stimulates us to greater apostolic zeal, and on the other manifests clearly the infinite mercy of God with his creatures.

This is how Saint Thomas explained it: The sacrament of Baptism may be wanting to someone in two ways. First, in reality and desire, as is the case of those who are neither baptized nor wish to be baptized: which clearly indicates contempt of the sacrament for those who have the use of reason. Consequently those to whom Baptism is wanting thus, cannot obtain salvation: since neither sacramentally nor spiritually are they incorporated in Christ, through whom alone can salvation be obtained. Secondly, the sacrament of Baptism may be wanting to someone in reality but not in desire: for instance, when a man wishes to be baptized, but by some misfortune he is forestalled by death before receiving Baptism. Such a man can obtain salvation without actually being baptized, on account of desire for Baptism, a desire which is the outcome of faith that works by charity, whereby God, whose power is not tied to visible sacraments, sanctifies man inwardly.

God Our Lord denies no one supernatural and eternal happiness, although it is a completely free gift to which no one has a right, especially after sin. His generosity is infinite. It is a matter of common knowledge that those who suffer invincible ignorance of our most holy religion but carefully observe all the precepts of the Natural Law which are engraved by God in the hearts of all men, and want to obey God and lead an upright life, can obtain eternal life through the efficacious action of divine light and grace.

God alone knows what goes on in the heart of each man, and he does not deal with souls en masse, but one by one. No one on this earth can make a judgement about the eternal salvation or condemnation of any individual.

Let us not forget that conscience can be culpably deformed and harden itself in sin, resisting the saving action of God. That is why it is necessary to spread Christ's doctrine, the truths of faith and the norms of Christian morality. That is also why we need the sacraments, all of which were instituted by Jesus Christ as instrumental causes of his grace and remedies for the weaknesses that ensue from our fallen nature. Finally, that is why we need to receive frequently the sacraments of Penance and the Eucharist.

The awesome responsibility of all the Church's members and especially of its shepherds is made clear in Saint Paul's advice: I charge you in the presence of God and of Christ Jesus who is to judge the living and the dead, and in the name of his coming and of his kingdom: Preach the word, be urgent in season and out of season, convince, rebuke, and exhort, be unfailing in patience and in teaching. For the time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching, but having itching ears they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own likings, and will turn away from listening to the truth and wander into myths.

I cannot say how often the prophetic words of the Apostle have been fulfilled, but you would have to be blind not to see how they are being carried out almost to the letter in our own time. People reject the doctrine contained in the law of God and of the Church. They twist the content of the beatitudes, translating them into a socio-political doctrine. They attack those who try to be humble, meek and pure of heart as ignorant or outdated partisans of things long ago consigned to the past. They refuse to bear the yoke of chastity and invent a thousand excuses to evade Christ's divine precepts.

There is one symptom that sums up this whole situation: the attempt to change the supernatural aims of the Church. When they speak of justice, some people no longer understand by it a life of sanctity, but a particular political struggle, more or less influenced by Marxism, which is incompatible with the Christian faith. For them, liberation does not imply a personal battle to flee from sin, but merely a human task which may be noble and just in itself, but which is meaningless for a Christian, if it implies losing sight of the one thing necessary — the eternal salvation of souls, one by one.

With a blindness that comes from separating themselves from God — this people honours me with their lips, but their heart is far from me — some fabricate an image of the Church that has nothing to do with what Christ founded. Even the holy sacrament of the altar, the renewal of the sacrifice of Calvary, is profaned or reduced to a mere symbol of what they call the 'communion of men with each other'. What would have become of souls if Our Lord had not sacrificed himself for us, to the last drop of his precious Blood? How can they despise this perpetual miracle of the real presence of Christ in the tabernacle? He has stayed with us so that we can talk to him and adore him. He has stayed with us as a foretaste of our future glory, so that we decide once and for all to follow in his footsteps.

These are times of trial, and we have to ask the Lord with an unceasing clamour to shorten them, to look mercifully on his Church and to grant once again his supernatural light to the souls of her shepherds and of all the faithful. The Church has no reason to try to pander to men, since they, individually or in community, cannot save themselves. The only one who saves is God.

We need to shout out loudly today — time and again those bold words of Saint Peter to a group of important people in Jerusalem: This is the stone which was rejected by you builders, but which has become the head of the comer. And there is salvation in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved.

Thus spoke the first Pope, the rock on which Christ built his Church. He was moved to do so by his filial devotion to the Lord and by his solicitude for the little flock entrusted to him. From him and from the rest of the Apostles, the first Christians learned to love the Church tenderly.

Have you seen, in contrast, how people talk heartlessly about our Holy Mother the Church nowadays? What a great consolation it is to read the ancient Fathers' ardent and loving phrases about the Church! Let us love the Lord our God; let us love his Church, Saint Augustine writes. Let us love Him as our Father, and her as our Mother. Let no one say: 'It is true that I still go to the idols and consult the possessed and the sorcerers, but I have not abandoned the Church, I am a Catholic.' You may still be united to your Mother, but you offend your Father. Someone else might say: 'God forbid. I do not consult sorcerers or the possessed. I do not practise sacrilegious prophecies nor go to adore demons nor serve gods of stone. But I belong to the Donatist party. ' What use will it be to him not to offend his Father if his Father will avenge his Mother whom he offends? And Saint Cyprian puts it more briefly: No one can have God as his Father who does not have the Church as his Mother.

In our days many refuse to listen to the true doctrine about our Mother the Church. Some want to redesign the institution, trying to introduce foolishly into the mystical body of Christ a democracy modelled on that of some civil societies. Or worse yet, they clamour for an ecclesiastical body whose members would be equal in every respect. They refuse to believe that by divine institution the Church is made up of the Pope, with the bishops, priests, deacons and lay people. That is how Christ wanted it to be.

The Church is by divine will a hierarchical institution. The Second Vatican Council describes it as a society structured with hierarchical organs in which the ministers are invested with a sacred power. The hierarchy is not only compatible with freedom; it is at the service of the freedom of the children of God.

The term democracy is meaningless in the Church which, let me insist, is hierarchical by divine will. But hierarchy means holy government and sacred order. In no way does it imply a merely human arbitrary order or a subhuman despotism. Our Lord established in the Church a hierarchical order which should not degenerate into tyranny, because authority is as much a call to serve as is obedience.

In the Church there is equality, because once baptized we are all equal, all children of the same God, our Father. There is no difference as Christians between the Pope and someone who has just joined the Church. But this radical equality does not mean that we can change the constitution of the Church in those things that were established by Christ. By expressed divine will there are different functions which imply different capacities, an indelible character conferred on the sacred ministers by the Sacrament of Orders. At the summit of this order is Peter's successor and, with him, and under him, all the bishops with the triple mission of sanctifying, governing and teaching.

Forgive me for being so insistent, but I must remind you again that the truths of the faith are not determined by majority vote. They make up the depositum fidei: the body of truths left by Christ to all of the faithful and entrusted to the Magisterium of the Church to be authentically taught and set forth.

It would be an error to think that since men seem to have become more aware of the bonds of mutual solidarity that unite them, we ought to change the constitution of the Church as if it needed updating. The times do not belong to men whether ecclesiastics or not. The times are God's, who is the Lord of history. And the Church can bring salvation to souls only if she remains faithful to Christ in her constitution and teaching, both dogmatic and moral.

Let us reject, therefore, the suggestion that the Church, ignoring the Sermon on the Mount, seeks a purely human happiness on earth, since we know that her only task is to bring men to eternal glory in heaven. Let us reject any purely naturalistic view that fails to value the supernatural role of divine grace. Let us reject materialistic opinions that exclude spiritual values from human life. Let us equally reject any secularising theory which aims to equate the aims of the Church with those of earthly states, distorting its essence, institutions and activities into something similar to those of temporal society.

Remember what Saint Paul told us in the epistle we read today: O the depth of the riches and wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are his judgements and how inscrutable his ways! 'For who has known the mind of the Lord, or who has been his counsellor? Or who has given a gift to him that he might be repaid?' For from him and through him and to him are all things. To him be glory forever. Amen. In the light of God's words, how petty seem human designs when they are used to undermine what Our Lord has established!

But I do not want you to ignore the fact that on all sides we find evidence of man's warped behaviour. Not being able to get around God, he turns and takes revenge on other men. Contemporaries of ours become terrible instruments of evil when they serve as occasion and inducement to sin, sowing confusion which leads people to commit intrinsically evil actions and flaunt them as good.

There has always been ignorance. But nowadays the most abysmal ignorance in matters of faith and morals is disguised at times with high sounding terms which appear theological. That is why Christ's commandment to his apostles which we have just heard in the Gospel, Go and teach all nations takes on, if possible, an even more pressing urgency. We cannot be indifferent. We cannot fold our arms and go into seclusion within ourselves. Let us step forward to fight, for God, a great battle of peace, serenity and doctrine.

We must be understanding, covering everything over with the kind mantle of charity. But charity must strengthen us in the faith, increase our hope and make us strong to say loud and clear that the Church is not what some people pretend. The Church belongs to God and has only one aim, the salvation of souls. Let us draw near to Our Lord and speak to him face to face in our prayer. Let us ask him forgiveness for our personal weaknesses and let us make reparation for our sins and for those of other men who may not realize in this climate of confusion, how gravely they are offending God.

In the Holy Mass this Sunday, in the unbloody renewal of the sacrifice of Calvary, Jesus Christ, priest and victim, will offer himself for the sins of men. Let us not leave him alone. Let there well up in our heart an ardent desire to be with him, next to the Cross. May our clamour rise to the Father, the merciful God, asking him to give back peace to the world, peace to the Church, peace to consciences.

If we do this, we will find next to the Cross Mary Most Holy, the Mother of God and our Mother. And guided by her blessed hand, we will come to Jesus, and through him to the Father and the Holy Spirit.


TOPICS: Catholic; General Discusssion; Religion & Culture; Religion & Politics; Theology
KEYWORDS: catholic; church; josemariaescriva; opusdei
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
This is the teaching of St. Josemaria on the Supernatural Aim of the Church.

This is the man the SSPX would have you believe was a liberal, indifferentist, naturalist, and secularlist.

1 posted on 08/29/2003 6:11:19 AM PDT by Hermann the Cherusker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Hermann the Cherusker
This is the man the SSPX would have you believe was a liberal, indifferentist, naturalist, and secularlist.

They also would have us forget his greatest title: SAINT!

Great article form the founder of Opus Dei! To those who are concerned about the "Work of God", hearing allegations of it being a "cult", this article should convince you of the charism the founder intends for the "work".

2 posted on 08/29/2003 12:34:00 PM PDT by TotusTuus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ultima ratio; Canticle_of_Deborah; As you well know...; ThomasMore; sitetest; Land of the Irish; ...
ping
3 posted on 08/30/2003 5:44:52 AM PDT by Hermann the Cherusker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hermann the Cherusker; All
Excerpts quoted from Maria del Carmen Tapia's book, Beyond the Threshold (Continuum Publishing Co., 1999), pp.269-277:

____________________________________________________________
Toward the middle of May of that year, the earth seemed to shake beneath my feet. I was summoned on the run, as always, to the sessions chamber of the central advisory. Monsignor Escriva was seated at the head of the table, with Father Francisco Vives and Father Javier Echevarria on his left, Don Alvaro del Portillo was absent. At Father's right were the central directress, Mercedes Morado, and Marlies Kucking, in her new capacity as secretary of the central advisory. I was told to sit between Mercedes Morado and Marlies Kucking.

Shouting, puffing and beside himself, Monsignor Escriva said, "Look, Carmen, this has to end. You are not going to laugh up your sleeve at us."

Complaining that she had opened up a post office box to receive mail from the outside, Escriva said:

"What is this, you great hypocrite, you deceiver, wicked woman? And that procuress, Gladys, that sow, let her come in!"

Speaking to Gladys, Escriva screamed, "Do you take letters to the post office for her, for this wicked woman? Do you comprehend the gravity of what you have done...Answer, ANSWER."

...Gladys said, "Yes, Father."

Monsignor Escriva breathed deeply before going on. "You will no longer work for the central advisory. You will not set foot upstairs on the advisory office floor. Let them find you some other job in the house. And now, go to your room and don't leave it for any reason! Do you hear? For any reason!"

When Gladys left the sessions chamber, Monsignor Escriva told the central directress and Marlies Kucking, in the presence of the priests already mentioned, "After this, take that one", he said, referring to Gladys, "lift up her skirt, TAKE DOWN HER PANTIES, and whack her on the behind until she talks. MAKE HER TALK."

Addressing me, Monsignor Escriva shouted, "I give you the second admonition, hypocrite. You write me a letter on my saint's day, telling me you want to begin again, and this is what you do to me! Tell these people everything, everything. You're a bad piece of work. I warn you that I'm waiting for some affidavits from Venezuela, and you will find out what's trouble. You're a wicked woman, sleazy, scum. That's what you are!"

...He (Escriva) went on: "And don't return to Venezuela! Don't even think of writing to anybody there. Because if you even think of going to Venezuela, I will assume the responsibility of telling the Cardinal what you are. And it would dishonor you!" Pacing the room, he continued, shouting at me: "I was thinking all night about whether to tell you this or not, but I believe it is better that I should tell you." Looking directly at me with a dreadful rage, moving his arms toward me as if he was going to hit me, he added at the top of his voice, ...

..."You are a wicked woman. A lost woman! Mary Magdalen was a sinner, but you? You are a seductress with your immorality and indecency! You are a seductress. I know everything. EVERYTHING! EVEN ABOUT THE VENEZUELAN NEGRO! YOU ARE ABOMINABLE. YOU HAVE A WEAKNESS FOR BLACKS. First one and then the other! LEAVE MY PRIESTS ALONE! DO YOU HEAR? LEAVE THEM ALONE! You're wicked, Wicked! Indecent! Come on, look at the business of the Negro! And don't ask me for my blessing because I don't intend to give it to you!"

4 posted on 08/30/2003 6:21:16 AM PDT by ultima ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Hermann the Cherusker
Letter to the Pope

A LETTER TO HIS HOLINESS, JOHN PAUL II, FROM FORMER MEMBERS OF OPUS DEI, THOSE WHO HAVE BEEN HARMED BY OPUS DEI AND OTHER CONCERNED INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE DEEPLY APPREHENSIVE ABOUT THE IMMINENT CANONIZATION OF MONSIGNOR JOSEMARIA ESCRIVA

Your Holiness,

We ask you to open your heart and mind to us, and to believe that we are deeply in earnest, for we are aware that in asking you for a hearing on the grave matter of Opus Dei and the canonization of its founder, Monsignor Josemaria Escriva, we speak as witnesses before Truth itself-Jesus Christ, the Faithful Witness, the Just One, who searches the reins and hearts and from whom nothing is hidden. We pray, of course, that Monsignor Escriva is at peace with God, but worry that canonization will promote him, as well as Opus Dei, as a model for holiness. We appeal to you now, at this late hour, because all earlier efforts have been ignored, and because the peril is profound. We believe that the truth we speak should be heard and acted on for the sake of the Gospel, the consciences of the faithful, the honor of the Church, and the future authority of the Papacy.

Because we believe that this truth has in large part been kept from you, we set forth our testimony now to warn you about the danger to the faith posed by unjustified reverence for the man you plan soon to canonize and by the highly questionable organization he created in his own image and spirit. We speak not only from deep and wounding personal experience but on behalf of other people from a great many nations who have been deceived, mistreated, and dehumanized as members of Opus Dei. Many of them, by the grace of God, have found it possible to leave in good conscience, but many others continue to suffer grievously within Opus Dei.

These members of an organization calling itself holy live and work not in the joyful spirit St. Paul calls "the glorious liberty of the children of God," but in a mind-controlled parody of Christianity and in the shadow of an idol whom they call "the Father" and "our Father." We are well aware of your regard for him, and know how shocking and implausible these charges must seem to anyone unacquainted with the darker side of Monsignor Escriva and Opus Dei. But we also know these charges are true. We therefore pray that that truth you praised so memorably in Veritatis Splendor will speak through you even at this late hour and prevent this terrible and unthinkable travesty from taking place.

In that celebrated encyclical, you wrote, "man is constantly tempted to turn his gaze away from the living and true God in order to direct it toward idols." That is especially true, your Holiness, when the idol wears a monsignor's purple, makes benevolent public pronouncements, and presents himself as a champion of Catholic orthodoxy--even as he alienates children from their parents, even as he seeks prestige and honors, even as he fosters a cult of personality and promotes his own canonization.

No doubt, your Holiness, you have both witnessed and been told about a very different Opus Dei. You have seen its other side-its zeal and efficiency, its apparent financial generosity, its help in combating communism in Poland and its contribution to countering pro-abortion propaganda in the developing nations. Yet such efforts only bring to mind the efforts of another Catholic organization, the Sillon, which a century ago won high praise before earning a firm and lasting rebuke from the great Pius X. With Opus Dei, as with the Sillon, the rod of correction is sorely needed. None of the good that individual members, or the organization, may have done or may now be doing can begin to compensate for the terrible harm it has done by dividing families, by turning many parents of members away from the Church, by its tireless and unscrupulous campaign to gain power and wealth, by the moral damage it does to its members through its culture of secrecy and dishonesty, and by the psychological damage it inflicts through depersonalization and emotional deprivation. As Monsignor Escriva advised Opus Dei members, "…eat, sleep and forget that you exist."

Meanwhile, all of this goes on even as Opus Dei claims to be, in the words of Monsignor Escriva, "the predilect of God," an organization benevolently intended for "men and women of all races who endeavor to love and serve God in and through their daily work." This is not the splendor of truth, this is the rhetoric of an organization that goes to extraordinary lengths to suppress any criticism, that cultivates in its members a dangerously intense loyalty to itself and to its founder, that behind its facade of orthodoxy is slowly insinuating itself into the highest levels of Church government, and that it represents a grave future danger to the integrity and unity of the Catholic Church.

We stand against this organization because we are faithful Catholics who refuse to call evil good or good evil. Just as the author of the Epistle to the Hebrews speaks of a cloud of heavenly witnesses watching over the children of faith, so do we, your supplicants, speak on behalf of a cloud of earthly witnesses. They include priests and professors, doctors and lawyers, cooks and maids. They include people who knew Monsignor Escriva intimately and who can witness to his arrogance and malevolent temper, his unseemly quest for a title (Marquis of Peralta), his dishonesty, his indifference to the poor, his love of luxury and ostentation, his lack of compassion, and his idolatrous devotion to Opus Dei.

Regrettably, your Holiness, you have not yet heard these witnesses. Neither has any ecclesiastic body in Rome, including the Congregation for the Causes of the Saints, which is charged with separating truth from error in the vital matter of deciding who shall be pronounced worthy to be called a heavenly intercessor. Quite simply, these witnesses have not been heard from because Opus Dei and its sympathizers have prevented it. The office of Promoter of the Faith (or Devil's Advocate) has been eliminated, with the result that, just when there is the greatest need for it, there is no one to say, "Let us now hear from those witnesses who think Monsignor Escriva should not be raised to the altars." And so now, as the days race toward the sixth of October and grave scandal to the Church, it remains for you, Holy Father, to be that Promoter of the Faith and to hear the faithful voices speaking out of that cloud of witnesses.

Having no fear of the truth, having no need to hide it or keep it secret in the manner of Opus Dei, we urge you to invite not only witnesses from our ranks to testify in your presence, but representatives from Opus Dei as well. Then let us see who will dare to swear falsely. It will not be any of those who have signed this letter, your Holiness, for we know that in the perfect will of God the truth we speak cannot ultimately be defeated, no matter how clever the opposition's lies, how artful the masquerade, or how long and persistently the deception has been carried forward.

As you well know, the Church is even now living through a nightmarish scandal because of the involvement of renegade bishops and priests in crimes against nature and crimes against children. But horrifying though it is, that scourge will pass. The canonization of Monsignor Escriva, on the other hand, will never pass. It will offend God. It will tarnish the Church forever. It will rob the saints of their holy distinction. It will call into question the credibility of all canonizations during your Pontificate. It will undermine the future authority of the Papacy.

The Church is being drawn to the edge of a precipice and is as near to it as the calendar is near to October 6. We therefore implore you, Holy Father, as your sheep and God's servants, to draw back, to seek out the testimony that has been kept from you, to reaffirm the mark of the Church as the pillar and ground of truth, and to trust that heaven will make a way out of this terrible difficulty even as it helps you restore the splendor of truth in the beauty of holiness.

In hope and fidelity, we await your answer.


5 posted on 08/30/2003 7:32:23 AM PDT by ultima ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Hermann the Cherusker
Well, sure it sounds good and what not, but, I am witholding assent until I hear what Time magazine and Mr. Woodward have to say about it.
6 posted on 08/30/2003 8:46:10 AM PDT by As you well know...
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ultima ratio; Hermann the Cherusker; All
http://www.catholicnews.com/data/briefs/cns/20021004.htm Opus Dei critic, a former member, supports Escriva canonization

ROME (CNS) -- A former high-ranking Opus Dei member frequently cited as one of the group's fiercest critics said she supported the Oct. 6 canonization of Opus Dei's founder and has never doubted the group's "divine origin." Maria del Carmen Tapia, who left Opus Dei in 1966 and later detailed her negative experiences in a book, said she even has prayed to Msgr. Josemaria Escriva de Balaguer since the Opus Dei founder's 1975 death and has received favors from him. "To me, a 'saint' is the person who fulfills and carries out God's will to the end of his or her life. And faith was, in my opinion, the most relevant feature in the life of Msgr. Escriva: his unshakeable confidence in God," she said.

221 posted on 08/29/2003 6:02 AM PDT by Hermann the Cherusker [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

That was posted yesterday and here you are today reposting information already proved to have been discounted.

Lord have Mercy. She says he is a Saint so it is reprehensible you cite her old writings to try and mislead others.

Sir, you have no shame.

7 posted on 08/30/2003 8:55:53 AM PDT by As you well know...
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: As you well know...
To: Canticle_of_Deborah; ultima ratio; sandyeggo; ThomasMore; NYer ... ROME (CNS) -- A former high-ranking Opus Dei member frequently cited as one of the group's fiercest critics said she supported the Oct. 6 canonization of Opus Dei's founder and has never doubted the group's "divine origin." Maria del Carmen Tapia, who left Opus Dei in 1966 and later detailed her negative experiences in a book, said she even has prayed to Msgr. Josemaria Escriva de Balaguer since the Opus Dei founder's 1975 death and has received favors from him. "To me, a 'saint' is the person who fulfills and carries out God's will to the end of his or her life. And faith was, in my opinion, the most relevant feature in the life of Msgr. Escriva: his unshakeable confidence in God," she said.

221 posted on 08/29/2003 6:02 AM PDT by Hermann the Cherusker

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

Ooops, I forgot to include this in the original. Hermann pinged you on this yesterday and you are right back here today using the same old arguements and so it is an inescapable conclusion you are citing this material to defame the name of a Saint and you are using material written by a woman who acknowledges and accepts he is a Saint.

PLease cease your deceptions and go to Confession as soon as possible. What you are doing is inexcusable and scandalous

8 posted on 08/30/2003 9:04:13 AM PDT by As you well know...
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Hermann the Cherusker
Great article, thank you for it.

The universal Church is a people which derives its unity from the unity of the Father, of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.

Dang! And all this time I figured if we could just bow or stand or incline out heads at the same time we'd have unity!

9 posted on 08/30/2003 9:32:03 AM PDT by american colleen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ultima ratio; All
Did you ever watch Seinfeld? Your whole approach to the matter of the Pope reminds me of the Seinfeld Bizarro World episode when everything was upside down - Bizzaro World Kramer, for instance, was productive and inventive and Bizarro Newman was well-liked by Bizarro Jerry ect.

This seems to me to be an episode of Bizzaro World Catholicism where the Pope is a scheming, Saint-process-manipulating fraud, and his opponents are unquestioned authorities as to the REAL judgement of Escriva. Heck, even the woman who acknowledges him a Saint is having her words dug-up to defame both Saint and Pope.

Bizarro World Traditionalism.

In another way, this reminds me of Alger Hiss. The "true-believers" of the Commies were constitutionally incapable of admitting he was guilty. For certain "true-believing" traditionalists, it is constitutionally impossible to admit Saint Escriva is innocent.

What reminded me of the Alger Hiss connection is that the old Commies would drag his name into every fight, even if there was no organic connection twixt the subject being discussed and Hiss.

Talk about Fall settling in and Halloween ect and the Pumpkin Papers would be assailed...

Little difference in this case. For Catholics, there is no question Escriva is a Saint. The Pope invoked Divine authority in declaring he is one.

The "true-believers" will continue to oppose Divine authority in this mater and they will not admit he is a Saint.

C'est la vie.

I won't argue with Commies about the supposed innocence of Alger Hiss and I won't argue with traditionalists about the supposed guilt of the Pope and Saint Escriva.

I would like to hear some self-described traditioanlist correct ultima though. I sure would were I a traditionalist because he is giving traditionalism a bad name.

10 posted on 08/30/2003 10:00:22 AM PDT by As you well know...
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: As you well know...
This is a non-answer, as usual. My argument is clear and simple. If the Pope expects people to venerate a "saint", he has an obligation to make sure that individual is worthy of veneration. This was normally done through a fair and judicious process that was above reproach. In this case, however, the process was rigged. The Pope, moreover, was warned publicly over and over that the process was dishonest and patently corrupt. As has often been the case with this pontiff, he went full steam ahead anyway and did what he intended to do at the outset. Once again he broke with Tradition--and as usual has reaped the whirlwind.

Nor is it for me to prove anything at all about Escriva. It was for the Pope to do this, to prove he was a true saint to be emulated by the faithful--and this he has not done, producing his "saint" instead in record time by stacking the deck and putting Opus Dei in control of a completely phony process. This was neither wise nor principled and has brought the entire matter into question. So I ask again--prove that canonizations are infallible as you claim. Where has a pope or council ever stated this dogmatically? In fact, no such dogma exists. It is a popular theological opinion, that is all, and it has been much disputed--which is why you can only answer with blather about Seinfeld.
11 posted on 08/30/2003 12:24:44 PM PDT by ultima ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: As you well know...
Where does it say what she wrote has been discounted? This is false. She merely accepts the papal decree--an entirely different matter. It stretches credulity to have us believe this just happened, moreover. It smacks of pressure tactics--a backstage maneuver by Opus Dei and the Vatican to bring about damage control. But remember, this woman was only one of many Escriva intimates who spoke out against the man but were prevented from testifying about what they knew concerning his vile temper and unkindness and lack of sanctity. Maria del Carmen Tapia herself was prevented from testifying--but now all of a sudden she is worthy of being heard by Rome? Don't make me laugh! This only makes the whole matter even more suspect. It is the most blatant kind of p.r.
12 posted on 08/30/2003 12:46:15 PM PDT by ultima ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ultima ratio
It stretches credulity to have us believe this just happened, moreover. It smacks of pressure tactics--a backstage maneuver by Opus Dei and the Vatican to bring about damage control.

A very likely scenario.

13 posted on 08/30/2003 4:15:36 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: As you well know...; ultima ratio
Dear Mr. Ratio:

You are not a Catholic. You are a heretic. You deny the authority of the Ordinary Magisterium.

From you to me, 7/31/03:
Not every teaching of the Ordinary Magisterium, however, is necessarily infallible, even though it has a strong presumption of infallibility on its side; otherwise, there would be no need for the Extraordinary Magisterium.



14 posted on 08/31/2003 5:51:51 PM PDT by findingtruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: findingtruth
I do not deny the Magisterium. What you don't seem to realize is that the Magisterium, to be infallible, must agree with the doctrinal declarations of past pontiffs in their teachings. Novelties, such as those proposed by this Pontiff, are not infallible unless formally defined. I do not accept what contradicts tradition--you need to ponder that and consider it. Pius IX warned that any Pope who teaches what is contrary to the Catholic faith, must not be followed. I concur.
15 posted on 08/31/2003 6:53:07 PM PDT by ultima ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: findingtruth; ultima ratio
ft to UR: ***You are not a Catholic. You are a heretic.***

That is simply silly. Ultima's theology is more resonnant with the Council of Trent than many of the US bishops and cardinals.

And that is the opinion of an anti-Trent Protestant heretic -- your's truly!
16 posted on 08/31/2003 6:58:16 PM PDT by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: findingtruth; ultima ratio
ft to UR: ***You are not a Catholic. You are a heretic.***

That is simply silly. Ultima's theology is more resonnant with the Council of Trent than many of the US bishops and cardinals.

And that is the opinion of an anti-Trent Protestant heretic -- your's truly!
17 posted on 08/31/2003 6:59:34 PM PDT by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

sorry for the freeper reflux.
18 posted on 08/31/2003 7:00:46 PM PDT by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: drstevej
"sorry for the freeper reflux"

Ha! Thanks for the chuckle--and the good word.
19 posted on 08/31/2003 7:28:30 PM PDT by ultima ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ultima ratio
de nada, mi amigo.
20 posted on 08/31/2003 7:29:37 PM PDT by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson