[P-Marlowe]

It is interesting that the whole Calvinist cabal has showed up and is up in arms about how terrible this article is, yet not one of them has offered an inteeligent critique of the article. They just say that it's trash and its biased and its inaccurate. But thus far they have offered nothing in the realm of a specific critique of the facts presented or the conclusions drawn.

[dsc]

That's not entirely true. I've already seen information to the effect that disagreeing with Calvin was not Servius' only offense; that he planned sedition and sought temporal power; and that he was burned at the stake at the order of the civil authorities and not Calvin.

[Cvengr]

Yeah, but in their defense, I suspect it's easy to read these threads and misinterpret meanings,....by reading a tone that doesn't exist or with pre-emphasis on a particular doctrine over another rather than several pertinent doctrines concurrently.