Skip to comments.
Calvinism- False Doctrines of the "Pope" of Geneva
http://www.biblelife.org/calvinism.htm ^
| Bible Life Ministries
Posted on 08/07/2003 10:48:07 PM PDT by Cvengr
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-194 next last
To: Sci Fi Guy; RnMomof7; Wrigley; drstevej
and he tried to betray Calvin to the catholics...Bingo. This was the motivation behind the entire Arminian movement.
The Romanists supported and even financed the Remonstrants in order to undermine the Reformation.
Without that piece of knowledge, history looks arbitrary.
But history is never arbitrary. Especially political/economic history which is what really motivated the Arminians.
41
posted on
08/08/2003 10:37:30 AM PDT
by
Dr. Eckleburg
(There are very few shades of gray.)
To: Dr. Eckleburg
"Religion is fashionable in our age. But is it that which sprang up, after centuries of darkness, among our fathers in Europe? Is it that of apostles and prophets? Is it the calm yet thorough religion which did such great deeds in other days? Has it gone deep into the conscience? Has it filled the heart? Has it pervaded the man? Or has it left the conscience unpacified, the heart unfilled, the man unchanged, save with some external appliances of religiousness, which leaves him hollow as before? There is at this moment many an aching spirit, bitterly conscious of this hollowness. The doctrine, the profession, the good report of others, the bustle of work, will not fill the soul. God Himself must be there, with His covering righteousness, His cleansing blood, His quickening Spirit."
Without ... this --- religion is but a shell: holy services are dull and irksome."
"Joy in God, which is the soul and essence of worship, is unknown. Sacraments, prayer-meetings, religious services, labours of charity, will not make up for the living God."
"How much of unreality there may be in the religious life of our age, it is for each individual to determine for himself, that he may not be deceived nor lose his reward."(1)
"All unreality is weakness as well as irksomeness; and the sooner that we are ... stripped of unreality --- the better, both for peace and for usefulness."
42
posted on
08/08/2003 10:47:50 AM PDT
by
f.Christian
(evolution vs intelligent design ... science3000 ... designeduniverse.com --- * architecture * !)
To: dsc
Moses murdered an Egyptian who was beating a Hebrew. The next day, Moses came upon two Hebrews fighting, and he tried to stop them. One of them asked Moses if he planned to murder him like Moses did the Egyptian.
Moses thought his murder was known. He fled into the desert, met Jethro and his daughters, tended Jethro's flock and came upon a burning bush in the desert.
The rest is history... (Exodus 2)
To: Dr. Eckleburg
and he tried to betray Calvin to the catholics... Bingo. This was the motivation behind the entire Arminian movement. The Romanists supported and even financed the Remonstrants in order to undermine the Reformation.Interesting, and quite telling. It has always seemed to me that Arminianism was more about opposing Calvin than it was about proclaiming Truth. There is a semi-Pelagian element in the Arminain insistence on free will and man's so-called ability to choose in favor of God apart from God's Grace that isn't even logical, let alone scriptural. Knowing that the Romanists were behind Arminianism casts the whole doctrinal system into suspicion.
44
posted on
08/08/2003 11:15:14 AM PDT
by
nobdysfool
(Let God be true, and every man a liar...)
To: nobdysfool
And it explains the symbiosis between Arminianism and Catholicism.
They both march to the beat of the almighty "FREE WILL."
From the beginning of creation, same as it ever was.
45
posted on
08/08/2003 11:20:28 AM PDT
by
Dr. Eckleburg
(There are very few shades of gray.)
To: dsc
Okay, you got me on that one. I can't remember a murder committed by Moses.He killed the Egyptian before he fled into the desert for 40 years
46
posted on
08/08/2003 12:24:53 PM PDT
by
RnMomof7
To: nobdysfool
Interesting, and quite telling. It has always seemed to me that Arminianism was more about opposing Calvin than it was about proclaiming Truth. There is a semi-Pelagian element in the Arminain insistence on free will and man's so-called ability to choose in favor of God apart from God's Grace that isn't even logical, let alone scriptural. Knowing that the Romanists were behind Arminianism casts the whole doctrinal system into suspicionThe Protestants were "protesting" Rome and the theology of Rome.The Arminians were "protesting" the protestants..it took me a while to figure out that most non Catholic churches are NOT Protestants(in spite of calling themself such)
47
posted on
08/08/2003 12:30:15 PM PDT
by
RnMomof7
To: RnMomof7
it took me a while to figure out that most non Catholic churches are NOT Protestants(in spite of calling themself such)Good point...at least the majority of Baptists are honest about it. They disclaim being Protestant.
48
posted on
08/08/2003 12:43:45 PM PDT
by
nobdysfool
(Let God be true, and every man a liar...)
To: drstevej; Revelation 911
Do you serve white or red wine with barbequed poofster? Neither is appropriate. I believe a rosé wine is called for in this instance.
49
posted on
08/08/2003 12:56:16 PM PDT
by
Alex Murphy
(Athanasius contra mundum!)
To: Cvengr
If this were a piece written to denounce George W. Bush, Ronald Reagan, or Abraham Lincoln, it would be called what it is:
Yellow Journalism. This is absolute trash, bird-cage liner, and garbage. You do not even know the history of your own opposing belief, and how it was the Romanists who were behind the Arminians.
If you want the truth about Calvin, you don't go to an obvious opponent of his teachings and expect to get a fair and balanced piece.
When one follows false doctrines, one trait similar to drunkeness occurs. The first thing to be impaired by imbibing alcohol is the ability to recognize one is impaired.
I know you meant that to be pointed at Calvinists, but it works just as well when pointed to Arminians....in fact, I'd say even better!
Similarly, whenever some extreme reports are made about a system which seems rightoeus, one might consider that those following that system might have fallen off the righteous track somewhere and perhaps rather extremely.
No, the proper response is to research more carefully, not jump to conclusions. Take the beam out of your own eye before trying to remove the speck from your brother's....or did you forget that?
50
posted on
08/08/2003 1:06:26 PM PDT
by
nobdysfool
(Let God be true, and every man a liar...)
To: Revelation 911
![](http://daisydownunder.com/images/hooker3.jpg)
"This...isn't...reality. This is Revelation...911."
51
posted on
08/08/2003 1:10:07 PM PDT
by
Frumanchu
(mene mene tekel upharsin)
To: biblewonk
{ping}
(from the article) One must first study the man, John Calvin
I'm glad the author started it this way. That puts the whole thing in the correct "Dave Hunt" sort of light, doncha think? ;O)
52
posted on
08/08/2003 2:21:54 PM PDT
by
newgeezer
(fundamentalist, regarding the Constitution AND the Holy Bible, i.e. WORDS MEAN THINGS)
To: dsc; Wrigley
It is history bent to sway opinion, such as, "The agressive Americans viciously slaughtered thousands of Japanese civilians when they violently dropped the Atomic Bomb on these innocent victims".
53
posted on
08/08/2003 2:33:14 PM PDT
by
irishtenor
(My God is omnipotent, sorry about yours. *** Swarming Calvinists Unite!***)
To: irishtenor
You are correct sir.
History reported in a way to inflame.
54
posted on
08/08/2003 2:36:30 PM PDT
by
Wrigley
To: ThomasMore
I am doing this at work, no books available. Sorry.
55
posted on
08/08/2003 2:36:53 PM PDT
by
irishtenor
(My God is omnipotent, sorry about yours. *** Swarming Calvinists Unite!***)
To: dsc
He killed an Egyptian guard who was beating the Hebrews, thus he was sent into exile. What? You never watched the "Ten Commandments"? Moses looks exactly like Charleton Heston.
56
posted on
08/08/2003 2:41:17 PM PDT
by
irishtenor
(My God is omnipotent, sorry about yours. *** Swarming Calvinists Unite!***)
To: Revelation 911; Wrigley; CCWoody; RnMomof7; CARepubGal; drstevej; Jean Chauvin; snerkel; xzins; ...
...but by that measure we should be hold weekly bbq's down at the Espiscopal church headquarters We've missed you Rev! Tell you what, i'll supply the stakes (not steaks!!), wood and rope, can you bring the Marshmellows and hotdogs? BTW, should i use kerosine or charcoal starter?
57
posted on
08/08/2003 2:47:19 PM PDT
by
Calvinist_Dark_Lord
("I have come here to kick @$$ and chew bubblegum...and I'm all outta bubblegum!" -Roddy Piper;)
To: newgeezer
People sure take there "believe my way or you are blaspheming" stuff too far.
58
posted on
08/08/2003 2:54:45 PM PDT
by
biblewonk
(Spose to be a Chrisssssssstian)
To: biblewonk
It was never suppose to be this way.
59
posted on
08/08/2003 3:03:35 PM PDT
by
Codie
To: Cvengr
I suspect many Believers come to Christ through the reading of the Scripture and the guidance of the Holy Spirit.
Is it not true that before a group can be viewed as a Christian cult, they must be shown to pervert the Gospel and biblical doctrines that effect salvation sufficiently so as to void salvation?
There are three essential doctrines that are inspected when determining whether a group is Christian or a Christian cult: (1) the Deity of Christ, which involves the Trinity; (2) the physical death and resurrection; and (3) salvation by Grace alone. Can you show where Calvinists depart from these doctrines?
60
posted on
08/08/2003 3:27:50 PM PDT
by
snerkel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-194 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson