Perhaps I the only one who winced at this: God has once again brought an Easter out of Good Friday.' said Rev. Gene Robinson after his election as the first openly gay bishop. Good heavens, man, why dont you just do the full James Cameron: hop up on the cross and shout Im King of the Jews!This story has irritated me from the start, and it has nothing to do with Rev. Robinsons sexual orientation. The guy left his wife and kids to go do the hokey-pokey with someone else: thats what its all about, at least for me. Marriages founder for a variety of reasons, and ofttimes theyre valid reasons, sad and inescapable. But I want to have sex with other people is not a valid reason for depriving two little girls of a daddy who lives with them, gets up at night when they're sick, kisses them in the morning when they wake. There's a word for people who leave their children because they don't want to have sex with Mommy anymore: selfish. I'm not a praying man, but I cannot possibly imagine asking God if that would be okay. Send them another Dad, okay? Until you do I'll keep my cellphone on 24/7, I promise.
Who are you to judge? is the standard response, and I quote Captain James T. Kirk when asked the same question by Kodos the Executioner: who do I have to be? Ill tell you this: my nightmare is losing my daughter. The idea of leaving her on purpose is inconceivable, and I dont care if Adriana Lima drove up the driveway in a '57 BelAir convertible, tossed me the keys and asked me to drive her to Rio, it aint gonna happen. I made a promise when I married my wife, and I made another when we had our daughter. It's made me rather cranky on the subject of men who don't stick around. They're letting down the side. They're reverting to type. They're talking from their trousers.
I know, I know, his daughters love him & support him now. So what. Hitlers dog went to his funeral. (No, that doesnt make sense, but its my favorite wrench to throw in conversations this week.) If hed cast off his family to cavort with a woman from the choir, Im not sure hed be elevated to the level of moral avatar but by some peculiar twist the fact that he left mom for a man insulates him from criticism. Its as if he had to do it. To stay in the marriage would have been (crack of thunder, horses neighing) living a lie, and nowadays were told thats the worst thing anyone can do. Better to bedevil other lives with the truth than inconvenience your own with a lie. Right? If others are harmed in the short run, eventually they will be happy because youre happier. Right?
I dont think it works that way with little children. I dont think they understand why Dads leave and so they make up their own reasons and spend years looking for evidence in other people.
Heard an interview with Rev. Robinson this afternoon, and he used a phrase that set my teeth on edge: he referred to partnerships as life-intentioned. A wonderful weasel word, that: intention. The escape hatch is built right in. Its as if the intention to stay together is equal to the expressed promise to stay together. But its not. Everyone had a faithless lover who did you wrong, and usually blamed everything but free will. It just happened, you know. Wasnt intending to cheat, but . . . it just happened, okay?
Tonight I told my wife that I now regarded our marriage vows not as a solemn promise, but an expression of my intentions.
Ever seen those Bringing Up Father cartoons where Jiggs flees the house, trailed by a fusillade of rolling pins and frying pans?
Colleen ... this is priceless!!! Thank you for posting that article. And thank you too for the link .... that one needs posting to the forum!