Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins
To add to the previous answer:

Below are many of the authors that have either influenced or are influencing New Thought.

Alan Anderson, Michael Beckwith, Nona Brooks, Emilie Cady, Deepak Chopra, Annetta, Julius & Horatio Dresser, Meister Eckhart, Mary Baker Eddy, Frederick Eikrenkoetter, Ralph Waldo Emerson, Warren Felt Evans, Charles & Myrtle Fillmore, Matthew Fox, Ernest Holmes, Fenwicke Holmes, Emma Curtis Hopkins, Joseph Murphy, Phineas Parkhurst Quimby, Muata Rasuli, Don Miguel Ruiz, Erwin Seale, Florence Scovel Shinn, Emanuel Swedenborg, Masaharu Taniguchi, Ishmael Tetteh, Eckhart Tolle, Thomas Troward, Iyanla Vanzant, Neale Donald Walsch, William W. Walter

Some New Thought Organizations
(THIS IS NOT A COMPLETE LISTING!)

Directories:

Affiliated New Thought Network http://www.newthought.org

Association of Unity Churches http://www.unity.org

Divine Science http://www.angelfire.com/il/divinescience

Divine Science Federation International http://dsfederation.tripod.com/page10.html

Global Religious Science Ministries http://grsm.net/ministries.htm

International New Thought Alliance http://websyte.com/alan/grmemb.htm

New Thought Network http://www.newthought.net/churchdirectory.htm

Religious Science International http://www.rsintl.org/rsimember.htm

United Church of Religious Science http://www.religiousscience.org

United Divine Science Ministries International http://www.uniteddivinescience.org
17 posted on 08/06/2003 9:06:08 AM PDT by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: TBP; sinkspur
I studied New Thought stuff at Unity and Science of Mind for a couple of years. Found much to like. Had some good experiences. Nice people. Nice services. But soon became disenchanted. I mean that exactly. When the haze of all that niceness faded, I began to feel like I was attending spiritual kindergarten.

IMHO, the New Thought churches are too wishy-washy, plus they have wantonly misinterpreted the Bible. The Bible according to Charles and Mildred Filmore? Doesn't bear much resemblance to the ancient, profound New and Old Testaments.

I was even asked to give talks at a Science of Mind church. I based my talks on Ernest Holme's epic poem in book form: The voice Celestial, which has some lovely passages. Holmes had much more depth than the Fillmores and was also an excellent speaker...I had some of his tapes. But Holmes is long dead and no one can fill his shoes. For me, speaking at the church was the beginning of my path back to more complex beliefs. In New Thought, I found only acceptance of the joys of life as holy. But what about sorrow? The painful paths some are given in life? New Thought makes it seem very unholy not to be on a high fulltime. I find that unrealistic, shallow, and unkind.

Attending a New Thought church is like going to see a motivational speaker.....the experience has value, but has no deep sense of the presence, power, and majesty of God. As I said, it's nice. But nice is not enough for me to base my spiritual life on.

24 posted on 08/06/2003 11:32:22 AM PDT by PoisedWoman (Fed up with the CORRUPT liberal media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson