Replies

No, I am sorry, you are both incorrect. The college was to be a project spearheaded by Dr. Bond and he set up shop with the Society to begin implementation of the school. In the process, he became suspicious about the Society. Parents were making charges and he saw firsthand young boys being plied with alcohol at the seminary.

I actually called, and spoke with Bishop Timlin personally about this. Yes, when I asked him, wasn't this horrendous that boys were being plied with liquor, "Oh yes!" he replied. Yes, when I asked him, wasn't this horrendous that they shared the bed with these boys, "Oh yes!" he replied. Wasn't the squandering of raised funds in a way that required, by court order (I believe) an outside accounting procedure to be instituted, "Oh yes!" he replied. Well then in the aggregate, isn't this scandal enough to condemn the society? "Oh no!" he replied. He is a prevaricator, and so are they and I have it first hand from both parties. V's wife.