Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: sinkspur
Those who were abused in the 50s and before are older than 60, or dead,

The numbers the Herald ran were lifted directly from the AG's report and based on archdiocesan records of abuse reported at those times.

The report (though it doesn't seem all that worth reading) is at Attorney General's Report

An appendix, however, lists by year of graduation the numbers of accused priests who graduated from St. John's Seminary. The chart starts in 1946, so I'm assuming they didn't find any for the earlier 40's. To summarize by decade (see the AG's report, Appendix 2 for the chart):

1940s -- 5
1950s -- 33
1960s -- 52
1970s -- 16
1980s -- 5
1990s -- 2

1960 was, of course, the infamous class that produced both Geoghan and Shanley, if I recall, as well as the infamous Bishop McCormack.

65 posted on 08/01/2003 11:35:46 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: maryz
Mary,was there any data on the number of charges for all priests from all seminaries including St. John's broken down this way?

From the information I have I can't tell whether the abusers were all priests or if it included church workers like the Reardon character,choir directors,coaches,youth ministers et al. Do you know?

And,last but not least did the Attorney General ever categorize the abuses in any way that would indicate sex of the victims,ages etc. and/or the degree of the abuse. There is a significant difference in a kiss on the lips,which may be an ethnic custom and genital contact. Any info you can give me would be much appreciated. Thanks.

76 posted on 08/01/2003 2:53:28 PM PDT by saradippity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson