Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Land of the Irish
So why was it kept secret from the Catholic laity?

That is a very good question. I only stumbled across the info when I was looking up something else in canon law. How many ordinary people thumb through canon law? It doesn't seem to have been thought through very well, but I guess I wouldn't expect any priest to mirandize me in the process of making a confession.

I hate to be the bearer of bad tidings, but since you now know, you are obligated to seek out a confessor and follow his advice, if you haven't already done so, or you *may* be excommunicated. Not that *I* consider you excommunicated. They will probably just blow it off and tell you to get on with things.

I don't know why it struck me with such terror. I do not think most people would react that way.

That was a long time ago. You were a good girl. He was a naughty priest, but all too human. It probably happens more than we know.

300 posted on 08/07/2003 9:46:09 PM PDT by Aliska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies ]


To: Aliska
I hate to be the bearer of bad tidings, but since you now know, you are obligated to seek out a confessor and follow his advice, if you haven't already done so, or you *may* be excommunicated.

Why, do I have to now? It's been superceded by the 1983 Code of Canon law, has it not? And I did not find about this secret rule until 2003.

301 posted on 08/07/2003 9:53:39 PM PDT by Land of the Irish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies ]

To: Aliska
P.S. I'm a heterosexual, Catholic male.
302 posted on 08/07/2003 9:56:34 PM PDT by Land of the Irish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson