Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: George W. Bush
Actually, I always thought that 'jerk' came from 'soda jerk'. But perhaps Presbys have a different take on that matter.

Actually, "lapsed Lutherans" in this case (my understanding of the etymology of the term "jerk" employed as an insult derives from my dad, who didn't much favor the term either). I suppose that it's possible that the insult derives instead from "soda jerk" -- except that I can't really see anything insulting about a "soda jerk" unless jerk is already assumed to be an insult of some sort.

(Shrugs). I probably shouldn't be overly adamant about the Etymology of Slang (in which it's entirely possible that we both are right, some Slang having multiple origins); Me, I'm not much bothered by many commonly-reviled "four letter words", but I don't favor the term "jerk" (which is considered "mild" by most). Go figure. ;-)

Naturally, I like to imagine the problem of blasphemous phrases originates in denominations that practice infant baptism and have a central denominational authority. But I could be biased...

Well, of course -- the problem almost certainly had to originate therein, seeing as we were around before y'all, and all that... (Parry, and riposte; you may remise in opposition, good suh -- grin)


Interesting that this thread is so quiet. I thought it an interesting article... Oh, well -- perhaps wiser heads than mine are availing themselves of a nice afternoon nap...

9 posted on 07/27/2003 1:17:28 PM PDT by OrthodoxPresbyterian (We are Unworthy Servants; we have only done Our Duty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
Interesting that this thread is so quiet.

Most of the Orthodox are probably still at the agape meal following the all-morning services we hold. :-) We attended our parish's Slavonic liturgy yesterday morning and slept in this morning.

11 posted on 07/27/2003 1:22:26 PM PDT by MarMema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
Well, of course -- the problem almost certainly had to originate therein, seeing as we were around before y'all, and all that... (Parry, and riposte; you may remise in opposition, good suh -- grin)

Darn. And you even have the nerve to be reasonable about my insulting remarks.

Johnson's article just doesn't quite have enough red meat in it. It's neither hot nor cold. I think he just did a poor job on this one.
12 posted on 07/27/2003 1:39:41 PM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
Interesting that this thread is so quiet. I thought it an interesting article... Oh, well -- perhaps wiser heads than mine are availing themselves of a nice afternoon nap... ~ OP Woody.
28 posted on 07/27/2003 4:32:46 PM PDT by CCWoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian; George W. Bush
One can make a pretty good case that "jerk" is short for "jerkwater", whose usage in the sense of trifling and bumptious dates to the late 19th century. In the OED, the oldest citation of "jerk" in the onanistic sense is in Eric Partridge, 1937.

"Jerkwater" originally referred to the method of filling steam railway engines from lever-operated cisterns in remote rural areas.

Considering the relative antiquity of "jerk" in the sense of a bumptious, inept person, I think it's highly unlikely that the usage derives from auto-erotic insinuations: in Tender Is the Night, Scott Fitzgerald (setting a scene in about 1920) has one of his characters criticising the the word "bull" (as in "bullshit") as vulgar.

68 posted on 07/30/2003 8:54:48 PM PDT by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson