To: sinkspur
You are right. The new code in 1983 did not remove the prior code proclaiming it a mortal sin to knowingly and willingly disobey the church teaching on abstaining from eating meat on Friday. It did however include some new substitutes mentioned in the "binding" canon law 1249 thru 1253. Having not removed the binding law as a mortal sin leaves it in effect doesn't it?
41 posted on
07/25/2003 9:13:13 PM PDT by
Sneer
To: Sneer
Having not removed the binding law as a mortal sin leaves it in effect doesn't it? No. It would have to restate the stricture, which it did not do.
Creating penances and tying eternal fire to their observance isn't exactly what "seperation from God" means to me.
42 posted on
07/25/2003 9:18:36 PM PDT by
sinkspur
("Maybe he needed killin'" Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton in "The Searchers")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson