Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: sinkspur
You are right. The new code in 1983 did not remove the prior code proclaiming it a mortal sin to knowingly and willingly disobey the church teaching on abstaining from eating meat on Friday. It did however include some new substitutes mentioned in the "binding" canon law 1249 thru 1253. Having not removed the binding law as a mortal sin leaves it in effect doesn't it?
41 posted on 07/25/2003 9:13:13 PM PDT by Sneer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: Sneer
Having not removed the binding law as a mortal sin leaves it in effect doesn't it?

No. It would have to restate the stricture, which it did not do.

Creating penances and tying eternal fire to their observance isn't exactly what "seperation from God" means to me.

42 posted on 07/25/2003 9:18:36 PM PDT by sinkspur ("Maybe he needed killin'" Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton in "The Searchers")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson