[american colleen]

you make no distinctions and don't trouble yourselves to know the differences.

I don't know what I'd do if a post that you wrote to me didn't have a personal slur and/or an assumption that you know what goes through my head! Without those things, I would doubt the writer was you!

SSPX is not and never has been sedevacantist. Not that this matters with people like yourself. You smear with a broad brush--as does EWTN--which, by the way, is the first to suck up to a famous celebrity like Mel Gibson, despite his adamant traditionalism.

Uh, I never said and do not believe SSPXers are sedevacantists. And ya, I do know the difference. And I myself happen to be an adamant traditionalist if that means fidelity and orthodoxy and a love and yearning for God and a love for the Catholic Church.

Suck up? That is so beneath you.

[ultima ratio]

How is it a personal slur if you yourself admitted you agreed with the writer who herself lumped SSPX, SSPV and other sedevacantists together? If you disagreed with her as you now indicate, why state you agreed with her? If you don't want to be criticized, try posting more carefully worded statements.