Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Texas Pastor Removed Over Latin Masses
Seattle Catholic ^ | July 4, 2003 | Peter Miller

Posted on 07/04/2003 9:27:18 PM PDT by Land of the Irish

For a Catholic priest in a small Texas town, it has been a particularly eventful week.

Over the course of three days, Fr. Stephen Zigrang JCL, pastor of St. Andrew's Church in Channelview, has been called into his bishop's office, threatened with suspension, removed from his parish and even forced to defend his mental health to his own father. These unfortunate events have taken place because Fr. Zigrang did something new during last Sunday's Masses — or, more accurately, did something very, very old.

Before each Mass on the morning of June 29th, Fr. Zigrang announced that he would no longer be offering Mass according to the revised missal of Pope Paul VI, instituted in 1969. He proceeded to offer the Mass according to the Roman Missal of 1962 (also called the "Latin", "Traditional" or "Tridentine" Mass). Parishioners who were used to attending a Mass in English, with the priest facing the congregation, witnessed a priest offer a Mass almost entirely in Latin, while facing the altar. Guitar bands and sing-along hymns were replaced by chants and reverential silence. Rather then standing up to receive Holy Communion in their hands, congregants were instructed to kneel and receive the Blessed Sacrament on their tongues. One of the three masses was a sung mass, also called a Missa Contata.

The Diocese Reacts Fr. Zigrang is a priest of the Diocese of Galveston-Houston, under Bishop Joseph Fiorenza. Upon hearing of the weekend's events, the diocese reacted immediately. Unable to reach him for most of the day Monday, the chancery sent word to Fr. Zigrang that the bishop would like to meet with him the following morning, July 1st.

Despite advice from others suggesting he be accompanied by a lawyer, Fr. Zigrang went to see the bishop on his own. He was told that he would be suspended and had until the next day to vacate the St. Andrew's rectory. He was provided a letter signed by Bishop Fiorenza and the diocesan Chancellor, Monsignor Frank Rossi, admonishing him for his actions and informing him that failure to "follow the liturgical directives of the Holy See in the celebration of the Eucharist and the other sacraments … is a grave disobedience and threatens the unity of the Church within the parish committed to your pastoral care."

First thing the following morning, the Director of Communications for the diocese, Mrs. Annette Gonzales Taylor, responded to an inquiry from the night before with an email claiming that, "…your inquiry is a bit premature in that Fr. Zigrang has not been suspended. At this time, Bishop Fiorenza and Fr. Zigrang continue to be in conversation."

When reached by phone to clarify the matter, Mrs. Taylor reiterated that Fr. Zigrang was not suspended, is still the pastor of St. Andrew's and no action has been taken against him. She said that she did not know whether he was at the parish today as priests take some days off. When asked why Fr. Zigrang would be (as witnesses claimed) in the process of moving out of the rectory if no action had been taken against him, she did not know.

At some point that same morning, as he was moving out of the parish rectory, Fr. Zigrang was called by Bishop Fiorenza, who recommended that he take a two month leave of duty. It was further suggested that Fr. Zigrang may want to seek psychiatric counseling during this time.

The following day, June 3rd, parishioners found a note on the St. Andrew's church door explaining that there would be no daily Mass or Eucharistic adoration. The note also referenced the name and number of another priest to contact.

Finally, Fr. Zigrang's elderly father was contacted this week by Chancellor Monsignor Frank Rossi, who expressed to him concerns about Fr. Zigrang's psychological well-being.

Past Efforts Fr. Stephen Zigrang has been a priest in the Diocese of Galveston-Houston for over 25 years and pastor at St. Andrew's for the past six. He is a former seminary instructor and has a licentiate in canon law. He was previously a member of the diocesan marriage tribunal where his lack of lenience toward annulment applications brought him into conflict with his peers.

Prompted by years of liturgical research and studies which drew him toward the Traditional Latin Mass, Fr. Zigrang had requested on multiple occasions for the opportunity to offer a public Tridentine Mass in a parish. His most recent request came in January of this year when he sent a letter to Bishop Fiorenza requesting permission to convert St. Andrew's parish in to a traditional parish (dedicated to the practice of the Tridentine Mass and other sacraments) or start such a parish in another location. Six months later, he had still not received a reply.

For the past couple years, Fr. Zigrang has been offering the Latin Mass privately in the rectory at 6:30 each morning. When he attempted to offer a single Latin Mass for his congregation on Sunday mornings, he was ordered by Bishop Fiorenza to stop.

In 1988, responding to Catholics attached to the Traditional Mass and sacraments, Pope John Paul II called for the "wide and generous application" of Latin Masses throughout the Church, but the decision was left up to each bishop on whether or how to implement those directives. Many bishops have refused to allow any such Masses, while some have allowed only limited access.

In the Diocese of Galveston-Houston, home to 1.5 million Catholics and the largest diocese in Texas (eleventh largest in the United States), there is a single Latin Mass offered on Sundays in downtown Houston. Not all believe that these accommodations are adequate to meet their spiritual needs, or in the "wide and generous" spirit alluded to by the Holy Father. Catholics who need to travel great distances with families have requested that the early Mass time be moved or another Mass be added for more reasonable access. Some have requested daily Masses; others Masses on Holy Days of Obligation; and still others a traditional parish, going so far as to locate property and priests available for such an arrangement. These requests to Bishop Fiorenza have reportedly been ignored or denied. The attendants of the Mass also are under certain restrictions, including a prohibition from promoting or advertising the Mass.

Critics point out that this diocese, which prides itself on promoting and celebrating diversity, particularly in liturgical matters, has demonstrated a clear and disturbing exception when it comes to the Tridentine Mass. Although hundreds of Masses are said throughout the diocese in a multitude of languages from Spanish to Chinese, and in a multitude of styles from "Country Music" to "Gospel Spiritual" with little to no concern from the bishop, requests for Traditional Masses are ignored and attempts to offer Masses in Latin quickly and definitively put to a stop.

Parishioners Respond The parishioners' responses to Fr. Zigrang's Latin Masses have been varied. Many were surprised but respectful of their pastor's decision, but there were also some notable negative and positive reactions. Some were openly hostile toward the move, storming out of the church at the beginning of Mass. Members of the musical band which performs at the 10:30 Mass were particularly dismayed (having no role during a Latin Mass), as were lectors and extraordinary ministers. After one of the Masses, a regular guitar player was particularly vocal about the complaint that would be forthcoming to the bishop.

On the other end of the spectrum, other parishioners were greatly appreciative of the opportunity afforded to them. Some old enough to remember when the Mass was in Latin were given a reminder of how much had changed and some of what was lost. Others who had never experienced such a Mass were struck by its simplicity and beauty. At least once attendant commented on the contemplative rather than "entertainment" focus, and another described it as "absolutely beautiful".

Several congregants came up to Fr. Stephen Zigrang after Mass to personally thank him. In what now appears to be his last Sunday at the parish, he gave them the rare opportunity to experience a Latin Mass in their parish, and allowed them to witness firsthand the reason for which their pastor was willing to risk the consequences which would soon follow.

***

Home

Articles

News Archive

Letters to the Editor

Assistance Needed

Further Reading

Links & Resources

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle...


TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Theology; Worship
KEYWORDS: catholiclist; fiorenza; tridentinemass
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 381-385 next last
To: sitetest
After Mass, we can go down to Solomon's Island and enjoy the rest of the day by the water. In this way, I think, my sons will be mollified.

Are the sea nettles up yet? Is the bridge open? Last I heard, it was closed. Why not just go to Our Lady, Star of the Sea? Or is it not there anymore?
261 posted on 07/06/2003 2:38:38 PM PDT by Desdemona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
There's certainly nothing wrong with women choosing to wear a head covering, but I don't think it should be presented as if it is a requirement.

At our church, about half the women wear a chapel veil. So it's not an absolute requirement of attending the Latin Mass, although some parishes actually pass them out at the door.

Although it's no longer a matter of positive written law, it's still a matter of divine law, since it's required in the Bible. You can compare it to eating meat on Friday and fasting before communion. These written laws were eliminated. But anyone who wants to practice the traditional Catholic faith will continue to observe these practices voluntarily.

262 posted on 07/06/2003 2:49:31 PM PDT by Maximilian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah
I don't understand your vitriol on this.

Pius V fixed the Tridentine, but ANY Pope has the power to suppress or modify it, as did Pius X, and Piux XII (among others.)

HOWEVER--no Pope may ABROGATE (completely wipe it off the books) the Tridentine Rite. It is still valid and, as we all know, it may be used.

However, no one can limit the authority of the Pope on matters liturgical, except the Holy Spirit.
263 posted on 07/06/2003 3:16:41 PM PDT by ninenot (Joe McCarthy was RIGHT, but Drank Too Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
Fiorenza is an abomination.

Perhaps this little incident will hasten his departure, in some way yet to be revealed.
264 posted on 07/06/2003 3:18:13 PM PDT by ninenot (Joe McCarthy was RIGHT, but Drank Too Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
Ahhhh....but the Old Rite operates with ALL the Old Rite rubrics, and by extension, with the requirements used in 1962, including headcoverings for the ladies.

That's custom, and not a hard-and-fast requirement; at the same time, when in Rome...
265 posted on 07/06/2003 3:20:16 PM PDT by ninenot (Joe McCarthy was RIGHT, but Drank Too Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: Thorondir; drstevej
I'll volunteer to run his bodyguards, since that's somewhat within my area of expertice and would be the primary need of any pope willing to clean up the mess.

Thus spake Thorondir.

Well, the Swiss Guard is quite sophisticated, complete with all the CIA stuff except surveillance sats.

Study up.

266 posted on 07/06/2003 3:22:05 PM PDT by ninenot (Joe McCarthy was RIGHT, but Drank Too Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: Desdemona
That's not a co-incidence.

There's a reason that the Church specifies PIPE organs as the preferred instrument--has to do with pneumos and the life-giving aspects of same.

Now, there's also the Pneumos Who showed up on Pentecost: also with a rush of wind.

You should hear Paul Manz' Variations on Veni Creator. Blows your mind.
267 posted on 07/06/2003 3:25:14 PM PDT by ninenot (Joe McCarthy was RIGHT, but Drank Too Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: saradippity
No harm done.

Odd, though, how reactions vary.

I approached my Pastor back in 1987 (?)--he had been the Prexy of North American, solid guy, not too much nonsense--about the possibility of doing the NO in Latin.

Although he was comfortable with my training a Schola to do the Propers (Introit, Offertorium, Communio) and the Ordinary (Kyr, Gloria, Sanc/Ben, Agnus) in Chant/Latin--he would NOT use any other Latin during the Mass.

He knew that Weakland would frown, mightily--but he didn't have to give a hoot. He had friends in all the right places.

He just wouldn't do it. In the end, it turned out that he was a rather weak fellow. You'd like him as a friend and as a priest--but he didn't take the bull (not just this one, mind you) by the horns.

Too much 'corporate life,' perhaps.
268 posted on 07/06/2003 3:31:54 PM PDT by ninenot (Joe McCarthy was RIGHT, but Drank Too Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: ninenot; Maximilian
I need to be honest about this: the primary reason that I have a bit of an aversion to the head covering is that it is just slightly evocative of the hijab, which I find to be distasteful, given everything it stands for.
269 posted on 07/06/2003 4:08:31 PM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: sitetest; B Knotts
"As for dress, I assume that dress slacks, an open-collared dress shirt, and dress shoes are appropriate for my sons, age 8 and 6? Also, will I be too casual if I don't wear a jacket and tie?"

Your dress, as far as I can tell, is a matter for you and your family to decide. I've seen workingmen in work uniform, laborers in denim and folks in "Sunday go to meeting" best.

WRT to chapel veil, I am uncertain if that is part of Church Law or simply customary, but I have rarely seen a women in pants or without headcover at a Tridentine Mass. At the NO services, well I've never seen a bathing suit, but just about everything else.
270 posted on 07/06/2003 4:09:44 PM PDT by narses ("The do-it-yourself Mass is ended. Go in peace" Francis Carindal Arinze of Nigeria)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: narses
At the NO services, well I've never seen a bathing suit, but just about everything else.

LOL

Ain't that the truth!

271 posted on 07/06/2003 4:16:57 PM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
Last time I checked it was Rome that instituted a New Mass and shut out the Mass of the Ages. If Rome wanted, it could make the Old Mass accessible to all Catholics in a heartbeat. It doesn't want to.
272 posted on 07/06/2003 4:17:21 PM PDT by ultima ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
A head covering for women is a custom--it is not a requirement. Nobody makes a big deal out of this--and never did, not even in preconciliar days. It is customary for women to use mantillas or even to pin a handkerchief on the head temporarily out of respect. Jewish men do as much--with the yarmalka. Similar thing--a custom, that is all.
273 posted on 07/06/2003 4:21:24 PM PDT by ultima ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: ultima ratio
I understand...see my #269 to explain my (slight) discomfort.
274 posted on 07/06/2003 4:22:55 PM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Your point is moot. The Church was bound by Pius V and nobody--not even Paul VI--has abrogated his Bull. Hence it is still in force--though neglected by Rome as if it did not exist. Tell me, if you can--when was the Old Mass abrogated officially by Rome? Answer--never. It is a lie to make this an issue--since not even Paul VI dared to contradict so clear a mandate by a predecessor.
275 posted on 07/06/2003 4:24:18 PM PDT by ultima ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

To: ninenot; Canticle_of_Deborah
The changes which were permitted were minor adjustments only, never major and never essential. So it is a falsehood to pin an argument on this slender reed. There was no precedence for CONCOCTING a Mass that is pleasing to Protestants but which alienates Catholics and suppresses Catholic beliefs. The gall of those who did this--the gall of even a pope who would dare to do this in defiance of every warning--is breathtaking and outrageous. They have sown the wind and reaped the whirlwind for the Church--a generalized collapse into scandal and apostasy.

(By the way, will you be honest enough to admit you were wrong when you insisted Bishop Bruskewitz invited SSPV--a sedevacantist fraternity--to his diocese to build a seminary? Or are you going to pretend I was the one in error when I said it was FSSP?)
276 posted on 07/06/2003 4:36:20 PM PDT by ultima ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: ninenot
There's no vitriol ninenot. I only get annoyed when these threads are reduced to personal attacks and insults. The intelligence level dives exponentially at that point and it becomes like 5 year olds in a playground fight. This is one of the reasons more people don't post in the religion forum. Just like in a real life ghetto, nobody wants to travel here because they'd get shot. If Christ were here He would be aghast.

I would disagree that any Pope has the authority to suppress the Tridentine. That's exactly what Pius V sought to prevent. However, we are not going to agree on this point so there's no need to argue. If there is some canon law or historical precedent which states a new Pope can reinvent the way we worship then I would be open to seeing that. (I'm not talking about minor tweaks to the liturgy, I'm talking about wholesale restructuring and reinvention)

277 posted on 07/06/2003 4:37:48 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
What it is is a remnant of the old days when a woman's glory--her hair--was considered a major distraction and St. Paul said as much. So there is a connection to Mideast culture, just as you suspect. Customs do change--but they have their charm as well when not made into too big a deal.
278 posted on 07/06/2003 4:44:49 PM PDT by ultima ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
At the Indult I attended head coverings were not required. Personally, I wouldn't have the slightest idea how to wear one and I'd probably put it on backwards if that is possible. There were maybe two women who chose to wear one. I agree, I have a gut level aversion to it. I'm not sure why (I think it's the hijab thing) but if someone presented a good argument for it I might change my mind.

The readings and the Gospel were also in English. Some here report in other Tridentines they are in Latin so I may have attended a modified version. I don't know.

279 posted on 07/06/2003 4:45:54 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist
Bishop Fiorenza had the diocesan vicar general call Fr. Zigrang's father and tell him that his son was mentally unbalanced.

OK, this statement is a good example of the virus plaguing those who see evil in every ecclesiastical occurrence.

First, it is factually wrong. Here is what the article said on the matter. Finally, Fr. Zigrang's elderly father was contacted this week by Chancellor Monsignor Frank Rossi, who expressed to him concerns about Fr. Zigrang's psychological well-being.

There is no mention of Bishop Fiorenza telling the vicar general to make the call, yet your version wants to blame the evil bishop for instigating this action. What action? Expressing concerns about the priest's psychological well-being. A phrase that becomes for you:" tell him that his son is mentally unbalanced."

These are blatant misrepresentations of what was written in an obviously biased article from an obviously biased website. Then you go on to represent, what are falsehoods to begin with, as tactics from the KGB.

Instead of seeing these references to Fr. Zigrang's mental health as sincere concerns, as a Christian response to what might be a real affliction, you see a conspiratorial strategy, aimed at preventing the promulgation of what you have been led to believe is the True Faith. I submit, that these distortions in fact, these misrepresentations, these exaggerations, these flights into fantasy and myth, are leading you away from the True Faith.

280 posted on 07/06/2003 4:53:25 PM PDT by St.Chuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 381-385 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson