Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: SoothingDave
So? None of them were given the authority that the Apostles were. Your point is moot. New Covenant. New Leaders.

Paul said James was an apostle.

Galatians 1:19 But other of the apostles saw I none, save James the Lord's brother.

Do you believe Paul?

Why would I continue to follow Jewish leaders when Jesus had put the Apostles in charge?

Gee that's funny. I thought all the apostles were jews.

And there were 13 successors and blood relatives of the Messiah as head of the Church until 135ad.

Go on believing that.

Why should I not? Did Heggisipus and Esuebius lie?

1,617 posted on 07/10/2003 12:45:28 PM PDT by Invincibly Ignorant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1613 | View Replies ]


To: Invincibly Ignorant
Paul said James was an apostle.

Duh.

Gee that's funny. I thought all the apostles were jews.

But not "Jewish leaders" meaning leaders of the Jews, the priests and the scribes, etc. Don't act stupid.

You would rather behave as a Jew than accept the leadership of the Church. You don't like what became of it, so you fantasise that God failed in protecting the Church from error.

1,620 posted on 07/10/2003 12:51:57 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1617 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson