To: Revelation 911
So speedy replies and being published count against one here?
911, rather than get huffy and walk away from a perectly good discussion, why don't you simply tackle what I wrote in #53? If I made a mistake in my reasoning in that comment, the neighborly thing would be to show me, now wouldn't it?
To: Patrick Madrid; PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
why don't you simply tackle what I wrote in #53? at what benefit ? your snide tone has exposed your motive - Youve danced around my assertions and now (as a literalist) insist that a plain reading of Matt 12:46 is inappropriate, yet Catholics turn around and do the same thing with Matthew 26:28 and Mark 14:24 as they relate to the Holy communion
Nah - no thanks
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson