Okay ... you're new here, aren't you? I responded with my post #9. That post provides you with links to two previously posted threads that prove the Shroud of Turin to be authentic.
You did not click on the links and read the threads. You responded with "Do you think the experts were wrong about the Shroud?"
I replied by asking you "which experts" since the very links I gave you point to MANY experts whose findings DO INDEED suggest the authenticity of the Shroud AND which demonstrate that the Carbon14 dating test was faulty.
You responded with the above ?????
The shroud bears an image of a crucified man. The ossuary carries some letters engraved into its lid. The two have nothing in common.
Now, if you are still wondering about the Shroud AND are ready to accept that one carbon14 test was conducted improperly, then I refere you back up to post #9 where you can click with your mouse on the blue text. These are links to two excellent threads that have already run in this forum. More importantly, those links will provide you with documentation supporting the authenticity of the shroud. Okay?