Replies

this is legislation is a tragic symbol of the decline of the West.

This is truly appalling! I have pinged everyone I know. Guess they're celebrating Dad's Day.

I have freepmailed Barnacle. On a different thread, he noted:

I’ve always wanted to ask a proponent of homosexual rights their view of rights for people who have sex with animals. How would they answer that question? I tried to ask it once of an activist who was a guest on a radio talk show, but the screener refused to let me on.

Their answer to this fundamental question would shed light on their assertions. Either they support those rights; in which case they are exposed for the perverts they are, or they oppose them demonstrating their hypocritical bigotry.

Either way, they are out on an indefensible limb - and they know it.

I expect he will turn up here soon. BTW ... I am a big fan of The Wanderer and Peter Vere. Can we expect this story will run in The Wanderer? What about posting this to the News Forum? They will eat it up in an instant!

I use this example to explain/teach particularly my 14 year old (my 9 year old is too young) the reasons why, as human beings created in the image of God, we need boundries. First the progressives knock down the first barrier under a "we are loving human beings just like you" auspice and then the next one goes, and so on. I teach her that we love all men, but we don't have to love their behaviour or even have to accept it.

This is appalling as at some point, there will be no behaviour that is considered wrong. Even pedophelia is rearing its inclusive head with the help and blessings of the psychiatric community. People say "they aren't hurting me" - but they are wrong. At some point we'll live in a world that is truly barbarian because it has no moral boundries - anything goes and everything is acceptable.

There is a man in Maine who lives with his dog as man and wife do. He has been in the newspapers and on the radio defending his lifestyle. Although people (so far) seem to be repelled, no one ever refutes him by using a "created in the image of God" argument. I don't think a lot of people are grounded in that belief anymore. Without that belief, it seems we are powerless to condemn any behavior.