Replies

"If he quotes the Protocols, then I am wrong. I still find it hard to believe."

Very well, "ask and you shalt receive." (As an aside, what's even more...nah, can't think of the word...is that not only does Williamson somehow tie everything into homosexuality and women wearing slacks, but he also sandwiches one of the references to the Protocols between quotes from Holy Scripture...)

Here we go....

-----------

[Speaking of the Clarence Thomas Senate hearings...] Yet before the hearings there was like a hysterical uprising amongst women across the land to insist her phantasizing be heard, during the hearings it received an inordinate amount of attention, and after the hearings there has been a spate of law-suits being filed by her imitators who fell themselves similarly victims.

Not the vile media played no doubt a large part in inflating the issue out of all proportion, in order amongst other things, whichever side won, to bring the Supreme Court into disprepute: "... it is indispensable to stir up the people's relations with their governments in all countries so as utterly to exhaust humanity with dissension, hatred, struggle, evny... so that the goyim see no other course open to them than to take refuge in our complete sovereignty in money and all else" (Pr. 10).

Nevertheless even our media require some raw material to work with, or to inflate, and that raw material was in this case, whether harassment be real or unreal, a deep sense of grievance on the part of many women - like a feeling they have been betrayed. Something is going profoundly wrong in man-woman relations.

Take another example of this grave disruption of nature in the USA today: the invasion of public life by gays and lesbians, men and women being "delivered up to shameful affections... changing the natural use into that which is against nature." (Rom. I 26, 27), then flaunting their unnatural vice in public and being rewarded by the vile media with a blaze of publicity. And decent citizens seem unable to do much about it, partly no doubt because "in countries known as progressive and enlightened, we have created a senseless, filthy, abominable literature" (Pr. 14) , which literature such citizens allow to prevent them from seeing the so-called "alternative life-style" for what it really is, namely one of four sins, as the Catholic Church teaches, so horrible as to cry to heaven for vengeance.

Again, something is going profoundly wrong when men in large numbers turn from women to men, and women from men to women. Might not women wearing trousers be contributing to this blurring and confusion of the sexes? In any case this upheaval, this earthquake in the realm of morals, is the correct back-drop against which to view the arguments for women's trousers, only this time the appeal will be to the men.

--------

Just a couple of points: 1) With regards to the "Pr." references, my Douey-Rheims Bible does not have these aforementioned passages in "Proverbs"; they are, however, almost identical to the respective paragraphs in a translation of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion I have read. 2) My wife wears trousers around the house. She is also happily pregnant with our next child. I can personally vouch that she is not lesbian.