[sinkspur]

That you willfully attempt to turn the phrase, in order to slander Pat Buchanan, is obvious.

How much of Pat Buchanan have you read? The man is obsessed with 1) Jews and 2) Hitler. Bill Buckley concluded, in 1992, that he could not defend Pat against charges of anti-semitism, and Pat has only gotten worse as time has gone on.

Pat's dad was an old "America Firster", a follower of the Jew-hating Fr. Coughlin and the Hitler-admiring Charles Lindbergh. Pat himself has argued against the theory of diesel engines being used in concentration camps, and defended the infamous John Demjanjuk against charges of being a guard in a Nazi concentration camp, only to find out that ole John had been a guard in a Russian concentration camp.

Pat's pretty well discredited himself, and will never be anything but an interesting anachronism.

[jt8d]

Let's stick to the remark you made. I realize that you have a handy tendency to digress, in order to obfuscate the issue, but I am wise to this diversion now. You stated that Pat Buchanan opined Hitler to be a "genius," and you did this shrewdly, deceitfully, and without noting the context of the remark. Now, here in your reply, you again attempt to muddy the waters by bringing up other issues that have no relevance to what YOU did.

Please address the issue at hand: that you misappropriated the "genius" quote for ulterior reasons. Stick to the point, and answer the charge--if you are capable of doing so, without going off on some he said/she said tangent.