Replies

What is your disagreement with me? I hold pretty moderate traditionalist views and try not to go around insulting people. I do think SSPX has gotten a bum rap, that its bishops were never excommunicated, that Rome has defamed the Society in order to win political points, and that it has failed in the attempt as the fraternity prospers--which is why Rome is now making all kinds of pleasant noises. But these are not extremist views. Some of the best canonists in Rome hold them. You need to look at what I have argued more closely. Much of what people THINK I believe--is nonsense. Sinspur thinks I believe the NO Mass is invalid, for instance. I never said that--not once. It is deficient, but not invalid. Nor does SSPX hold the view that the NO is invalid. These are assumptions made by people who are ill-informed but which have no merit in fact.