You want to schmooze and make nice to Fr. Fudgepacker? Feel free but don't expect Catholics to do so. AND don't expect Catholics to accept rebukes from you at all, much less for accurately calling faggots what they are: faggots. You also use the homosexual codeword "homophobia" which is almost always inappropriate. No real men FEAR homosexuals and few use the favorite codeword of the homosexualist propaganda set: homophobia.
In any event, if lavenders show up among your clergy, if you have a clergy, then we will mind our own business and leave that problemn to you. Meanwhile, mind YOUR own business.
I have read your posts. I am responding to them. If you don't think so, remedial reading classes are in order. If you can't understand what I post, that's your problem and not mine. I have a Jesuit prep school education (so long ago that they were still Catholic) that I will bet was superior to your secondary education given your admitted reading difficulty and it was a prelude to a college degree and a law degree. If you don't find me coherent, ask me if I care! I don't care. You are insisting on calling repeated attention to yourself.
Conservatives have a right to be rude and ought to exercise it a lot more regularly whenever they have any business being in the conversation. If it is your ambition to be a "tame" and not hurt lavender "feelings" by calling them what they are (faggots) when it is your business, fine.
So do you also claim to speak for the Catholic Church and their accepted terminology for homosexual as "faggot"?
You are truly becoming an embarrassment to the Church you claim to defend.
You want to schmooze and make nice to Fr. Fudgepacker? Feel free but don't expect Catholics to do so.
Uh...I am the one who objected to YOUR Church moving around and covering up the activities of YOUR pedophile priests..and you are the one who got all offended..whining about how I should mind my own business.
Now..because you got caught defending the indefensible...you are trying to rehabilitate your tarnished image by pretending you were debating against someone defending homosexual priests.
Your incoherant disconnected responses are becoming more laughable by the minute.
ROFL! What pious bag of wind!
You are too funny.
I have already shown where your responses had absolutely NOTHING to do with anything I've posted...but rather with your desperate attempts to assign me those positions you feel the most comfortable attacking.
You sit here and brag about your "superior education"....
I wonder why it has left you so unable to articulate a consistent position in this debate?
Conservatives should be MORE "rude"?
And should resort to base rhetoric like calling people "faggots"?
It is unbelievable that you presented yourself as some sort of spokes-person for the Catholic Church.
The sort of inflamatory nonsense you post does more to help the homosexual agenda than anything else.
I believe homosexuality is a sin just like adultery and other sexual immorality.
But I would prefer almost anybody as a neighbor over some kook who thinks that being conservative means the right to be a rude SOB who shrieks "faggot" at homosexuals.