[sitetest]

Dear narses,

Rev. Weakland spoke only for his diocese, not for the Church. His opinions had been publicly rebuked by those above him on more than one occasion. Sometimes his opinions were rebuked and his name was left out, when our Holy Father and Cardinal Ratzinger have expressed themselves favorably about the Tridentine Mass. Sometimes, Rev. Weakland was rebuked rather directly, as with regard to his destruction of his cathedral.

Show me where the official website of the SSPX in the US is rebuked by Mr. Fellay for these opinions expressed. This website says that the normative Mass of the Roman Catholic Church is EVIL. Show me where Mr. Fellay explains that the normative Mass is good, and Catholic, and worthy.

Then you have an argument. All else is cover-up of evil.


sitetest

[narses]

You are not acting with logic. Websites live for a long time. This FAQ was penned a decade ago. The SSPX has more than once acknowledged the validity of the NO Mass. That alone repudiates this "FAQ". Fr. Nes spoke for himself and whoever was running the US SSPX website 10 years ago, not the entire Society.

Here is what the the Superior General of the SSPX, H.E. Bishop Bernard Fellay said of the Pope in the interview that started the current round of talks: "If he calls me, I go. Right away. Or rather, I run. This is certain. Because of obedience. By filial obedience with regard to the head of the Church."