Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: P-Marlowe
Really! Thanks for the heads up. Now at least I can understand why it is difficult to follow some of the thought progression. It is hard to have a meaningful discussion when the definitions of words cannot be agreed upon. I can't help but to think back with a smile to the fiasco surrounding Clinton's definition of the word "is". Word play is tedious.
659 posted on 05/02/2003 12:31:29 AM PDT by so_real (It's all about sharing the Weather)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 655 | View Replies ]


To: All
I'll be out of town for a couple days but will check this thread again upon my return.
660 posted on 05/02/2003 12:40:02 AM PDT by so_real (It's all about sharing the Weather)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 659 | View Replies ]

To: so_real
Really! Thanks for the heads up. Now at least I can understand why it is difficult to follow some of the thought progression. It is hard to have a meaningful discussion when the definitions of words cannot be agreed upon. I can't help but to think back with a smile to the fiasco surrounding Clinton's definition of the word "is". Word play is tedious.

I resent RIGHTLY dividing the word of God (as I showed you with the Greek translation) with the liar Clinton

I respectfully ask you to withdraw that comment

For your information Augustine , Luther, Calvin, Knox, Spurgeon , Whitfield , Edwards were all alot more biblically literate than Marlowe ..and none of them were liars

668 posted on 05/02/2003 12:45:12 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 659 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson