Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: snerkel
1. It is not incumbent on me to "refute" anything, simply because you say that it is.

2. On those occasions when the lies that you and others constantly post ARE refuted, you simply abandon that thread and go to another. The article posted the refuted the odious crock of **** put out by the "Kingdom of the Cults" hack a couple months back is a case in point. Many were invited there to read a good refutation. One person actually posted cogent comments; the rest just made more disparaging "weather" remarks.

3. Since you're really not about "debate" as in an exchange of conflicting ideas, and only want to argue so that you yourself can "win" (at least in your own mind), what is the point? Not everyone shares your hobby.
398 posted on 04/09/2003 10:03:30 AM PDT by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 333 | View Replies ]


To: Illbay; snerkel
It is not incumbent on me to "refute" anything, simply because you say that it is.

You made personal charges against snerkel and against me (and probably others) that you cannot back up.

Either pony up the "proof" or retract your charges.

401 posted on 04/09/2003 10:07:17 AM PDT by Corin Stormhands (HHD, FRM, RFA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 398 | View Replies ]

To: Illbay
1. It is not incumbent on me to "refute" anything, simply because you say that it is.

It does not affect me personally if you choose not to refute information I post.

2. On those occasions when the lies that you and others constantly post ARE refuted, you simply abandon that thread and go to another. The article posted the refuted the odious crock of **** put out by the "Kingdom of the Cults" hack a couple months back is a case in point. Many were invited there to read a good refutation. One person actually posted cogent comments; the rest just made more disparaging "weather" remarks.

Ad hom. I have posted no lies. I have posted information using LDS resources. If you feel that I have lied, you should use that opportunity to refute my posts instead of attempting to attack my character. Attacking another persons character shows a lack of integrity on the part of the attacker.

3. Since you're really not about "debate" as in an exchange of conflicting ideas, and only want to argue so that you yourself can "win" (at least in your own mind), what is the point? Not everyone shares your hobby.

Ad hom. Are you also a mind reader?
418 posted on 04/09/2003 10:28:50 AM PDT by snerkel (Choose Jesus, not some cheap imitation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 398 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson