Just to be clear, I think that the Indult should be widely available and that those who prefer it should not be denied. This means that there should be more than one or two a month and in more than one location.
That being said, I don't recall any NO people saying that the Indult is a threat to their children, or that it is by its nature unholy.
It is the Latin-philes who accuse the NO of being dangerous and invalid. Not the other way around.
SD
I don't know the Latin Mass very well, but I do know it is more orthodox than the NO Mass said in most parishes. Sadly, our Pope and bishops still forbid the tradional Mass in most dioceses. One can only conclude they see it as a threat to the liberal agenda.
Conservatives, open your eyes. The reverently said NO is almost as rare a the Indult. Conservatives and Traditionalists must join in protest against the liberal, sex-scandalous Pope and bishops.