Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Canticle_of_Deborah
But please don't denigrate or deny other Catholics' choice of Mass. Likewise, what doesn't work for you does work for others and they have just as much of a right to it as you do.

Just to be clear, I think that the Indult should be widely available and that those who prefer it should not be denied. This means that there should be more than one or two a month and in more than one location.

That being said, I don't recall any NO people saying that the Indult is a threat to their children, or that it is by its nature unholy.

It is the Latin-philes who accuse the NO of being dangerous and invalid. Not the other way around.

SD

38 posted on 04/07/2003 2:00:05 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: SoothingDave; NYer; Bigg Red
Just to be clear, I think that the Indult should be widely available and that those who prefer it should not be denied.

I don't know the Latin Mass very well, but I do know it is more orthodox than the NO Mass said in most parishes. Sadly, our Pope and bishops still forbid the tradional Mass in most dioceses. One can only conclude they see it as a threat to the liberal agenda.

Conservatives, open your eyes. The reverently said NO is almost as rare a the Indult. Conservatives and Traditionalists must join in protest against the liberal, sex-scandalous Pope and bishops.

91 posted on 04/07/2003 9:26:42 PM PDT by Longshanks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson