Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WHEN THE POPE KISSED THE KORAN
TCR News ^ | Stephen Hand

Posted on 03/30/2003 12:41:35 PM PST by NYer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-320 next last
The facts are well known, if one would take the time to learn. Yet the Pharisee has a penchant for turning ones eyes from anything that will reveal his opinion to be an absurdity. Even authoritative texts matter little if they can be simply brushed under the rug of bigotry.

Perhaps this article will provide a clearer understanding of the gesture made by John Paul II and put to rest the papal bashing so prevalent among certain members on this forum.

1 posted on 03/30/2003 12:41:36 PM PST by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Siobhan; american colleen; sinkspur; Lady In Blue; Salvation; Polycarp; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; ...
The Pharisee is more comfortable with executing judgment than mercy which is considered a complicating factor. He prefers a simple world where one always knows what to do. That makes debating easier; and our modern Pharisee loves to debate.

Bring it on!

2 posted on 03/30/2003 12:48:48 PM PST by NYer (God Bless America. Please pray for our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: NYer
The Pharisee is more comfortable with executing judgment than mercy which is considered a complicating factor. He prefers a simple world where one always knows what to do. That makes debating easier; and our modern Pharisee loves to debate.

Why, whoever do you mean??? :-0

4 posted on 03/30/2003 12:57:19 PM PST by american colleen (waiting for the bare-breasted Mass picture to be posted AGAIN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NYer
To debate them is to feed their pride. Better to sincerely pray for them often. It is tragic beyond words when truth itself is inconsequential to the act of debating

I learned this pretty fast. LOL

5 posted on 03/30/2003 1:14:23 PM PST by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Inter-religious dialogue is a part of the Church's evangelizing mission

I just got home from Mass but I still don't believe the Pope should be kissing the Koran. Why isn't he evangelizing the Muslims, trying to save their souls? Wouldn't that be a better way of showing respect for them? If he tried to show a better way?

6 posted on 03/30/2003 1:15:11 PM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Thank you for this post. I have been praying and struggling with this for months. It has helped to clarify things for me.
L.
:-)
7 posted on 03/30/2003 1:16:10 PM PST by Litany (The Truth shall set you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
I don't think in his good days, he would have kissed the book of Marx to show respect for Communists or to reach out to them. He was at one time a staunch anti-Communist and he helped bring down Communism not by kissing their books but by standing defiant againt that ideology.
8 posted on 03/30/2003 1:24:16 PM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: american colleen
The Pharisee is more comfortable with executing judgment than mercy which is considered a complicating factor. He prefers a simple world where one always knows what to do.

Whoever he means, he knows them very well.

9 posted on 03/30/2003 1:26:33 PM PST by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
I agree with you. What did Jesus say about those that were 'lukewarm'? Appeasement is NOT the answer. Arabs are descended from Ishamel. I don't know if all muslims believe that they will be rewarded with 72 virgins in Paradise/Heaven, but Islam is the only 'religion' that I can think of that wants to continue the carnal/fleshly desires in Heaven/Paradise. How spiritual is that?? Hagar becomes prideful when she conceives, eventually giving birth to Ishmael. Later Abram, now called Abraham and Sarah give birth to Isaac. Ishmael's birth is 'carnal/of the flesh/darkness', while Isaac's birth was based on a Promise/spiritual/light from God.

God reinforced the separation of the child of 'flesh', from the Child of 'Promise', when Hagar and Ishmael were sent off to wander. Another separation of darkness from light. Just like at the beginning of the first creation.

Romans 13:12
The night is far spent, the day is at hand: let us therefore cast off the works of darkness, and let us put on the armour of light.

Ephesians 5:8
For ye were sometimes darkness, but now are ye light in the Lord: walk as children of light:

2 Corinthians 6:14
Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness?

Ephesians 6:12
For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.

1 John 1:5
This then is the message which we have heard of him, and declare unto you, that God is light, and in him is no darkness at all.

1 John 1:6
If we say that we have fellowship with him, and walk in darkness, we lie, and do not the truth:

10 posted on 03/30/2003 1:35:29 PM PST by ET(end tyranny) (Heavenly Father, please embrace, and protect, our Pres., our troops and those of our true allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
I was with you on that for awhile. I struggled with it for a long time.

I give him the benefit of the doubt, though. It could be he didn't know it was the Koran... why would someone hand him a Koran, anyway? Wouldn't ya think they'd hand him a Bible?

OTOH. Even if he knew it was the Koran, maybe it was a sign of respect for Islam. Although we do not hold all the same beliefs, there is a lot of good in Islam (not the minority wacko interpretation of it) that all of us can recognize.

And despite what some others believe, we do worship the same God, although in varying degrees of perfection.

But the bottom line for me is that in the matter of faith and morals, I'm with the pope. Whether or not he kissed the Koran matters not a whit to my faith.

Sometimes I think JPII fears the world will fall into something akin to the crusades. Only in our modern world, the results would be catastrophic.

11 posted on 03/30/2003 1:40:46 PM PST by american colleen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: american colleen
we do worship the same Go

How can allah be the God of Abraham? In the Christian faith, we believe that God made the Jews his chosen people but allah calls them pigs and monkeys? How can that be the same God? The leader the Muslims choose to follow was a polygamist pedophile ---Mohammed took a 6 year old child to be his "wife"? Nothing like the example Jesus set for his followers.

12 posted on 03/30/2003 1:45:43 PM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
Not only that, but their allah tells them to kill Jews and Christians. Same God? I highly doubt it. Islam encourages the killing of Christians for teaching others about Christ. Would a true pope give homage to the Koran, the "holy book" of a false religion? A true pope would NEVER do such an abominable act, imho

13 posted on 03/30/2003 1:52:44 PM PST by ET(end tyranny) (Heavenly Father, please embrace, and protect, our Pres., our troops and those of our true allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ET(end tyranny)
Appeasement is NOT the answer.

That's why I prefer to remember this Pope for the way he used to be ---he was a staunch anti-Communist, he didn't say to appease them. I think age and illness has done him in, he has gone from the level of Ronald Reagan to the level of Jimmy Carter. I don't hold his illness against him anymore than I hold Reagan's illness against him. Reagan at least is protected by his loved ones, he's been kept out of the spotlight, but I suspect there are those in the Vatican who are using the Pope's medical conditions to promote their own agendas.

14 posted on 03/30/2003 1:57:24 PM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: american colleen
Whether or not he kissed the Koran matters not a whit to my faith.

That's where I am also ---the Pope can bow down to the Hindu monkey god for all I care ---I'm still keeping my faith.

15 posted on 03/30/2003 2:00:48 PM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NYer
More excuses for the inexcusable. Christian martyrs died because they refused to do less than what this Pope has already done. This papacy has talked a lot about Catholicism's "fullness of truth." But when push comes to shove, it hides that fullness under a bushel in order to homogenize the faith and blend in with others. It preaches sycretism, pure and simple.
16 posted on 03/30/2003 2:01:02 PM PST by ultima ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FITZ; ET(end tyranny)
Why isn't he evangelizing the Muslims, trying to save their souls? Wouldn't that be a better way of showing respect for them? If he tried to show a better way?

At the present time, the hatred of the Moslem countries against the West is becoming a hatred against Christianity itself. Although the statesmen have not yet taken it into account, there is still grave danger that the temporal power of Islam may return and, with it, the menace that it may shake off a West which has ceased to be Christian, and affirm itself as a great anti-Christian world power. Moslem writers say, "When the locust swarms darken countries, they bear on their wings these Arabic words: 'We are God's host, each of us has ninety-nine eggs, and if we had a hundred, we should lay waste the world, with all that is in it.'"

The problem is, how shall we prevent the hatching of the hundredth egg? It is our firm belief that the fears some entertain concerning the Moslems are not to be realized, but the Moslemism, instead, will eventually be converted to Christianity — and in a way that even some of our missionaries never suspect. It is our belief that this will happen not through the direct teachings of Christianity, but through a summoning of the Moslems to a veneration of the Mother of God. This is the line of argument:

Mary And The Moslems

This interesting and timely article by the late Most Reverend Fulton J. Sheen first appeared in the Mindszenty Report of August 1991. It presents the Bishop's observations on whether Islam and Christianity can find common ground to co-exist in the coming decades. As editor John Boland says they are "more significant now perhaps than when written 49 years ago."

17 posted on 03/30/2003 2:01:19 PM PST by NYer (God Bless America. Please pray for our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ultima ratio
Pope Peil will kiss neither Korans nor altar boys; just his wife & kids. And NO clown masses or topless Scripture readers.
18 posted on 03/30/2003 2:09:46 PM PST by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: drstevej
How refreshingly Catholic--even to the kissing of papal kids.
19 posted on 03/30/2003 2:26:37 PM PST by ultima ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ultima ratio
Christian martyrs died because they refused to do less than what this Pope has already done.

I'd hate to hear your take on some of the Borgia popes. ;-)

20 posted on 03/30/2003 2:31:01 PM PST by american colleen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-320 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson