Replies

If you want to win elections you have got to gain the swing voter.

You are correct if your only objective is to simply to win elections. Your strategy works for those who simply want power. If you want change, your strategy is a recipe for failure. How are we materially better off than when Clinton was in office? Under Bush the government still steals 40% of my paycheck. Under Bush we are still at war. Under Bush we still murder our own children.

The only difference I see between Bush and Clinton so far is that Clinton was an adulterer and Bush is not.

I say again, you are politically foolish. How do you suppose headway is being made against the crime of abortion if not through the wielding of power? Believe me, it's all about power. Janet Reno used her power to harrass pro-lifers. Clinton used his power to thwart the will of the people by twice vetoing a bill prohibiting partial-birth abortion. It's always about power.

You remind me of the crazy Iraqis who crash pickups into tanks. Thousands of these thugs keep charging with their rifles and two-bit machine guns--and are being blown away by our marines because they have no strategy, no intelligence and ultimately no real power. They just have a fierce mindless passion--like democrats who lose elections and grow furious--but it's not enough.

How are you better off now? Let me ask you this. Since 9/11, would you rather have Janet Reno in charge of the War against Terror or John Ashcroft? Would you rather have Madeline Albright as Secretary of State or Colin Powell? Would you rather have Richard Cohen as Secretary of Defense or Donald Rumsfeld? Would you rather have Clinton who as president was all talk and no action, who despised the military and was himself despised, or Bush who murders the language but is a true leader of men and is beloved by the armed forces?