To: unspun; anniegetyourgun; nicmarlo; hoosierskypilot; Cicero; slimer; jude24; NH Liberty; ...
51 posted on
08/30/2003 8:35:30 PM PDT by
Destro
(Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorisim by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
To: Destro
Thank you for linking these two threads. Interesting. I appreciate an interest in being true to the New Testament Church (being as true as possible to its Head). I don't see how that is accomplished through grasping any particular tradition, as it presents itself subsequent to those fresh years. I think it best to gain as much as one truly can from the Scriptures, the Logos they describe, the Holy Breath that conveys the Good News, and our Father whom Word and Spirit relate -- abide therein and obediently, creatively apply, here and now.
52 posted on
08/31/2003 3:12:11 AM PDT by
unspun
("Do everything in love." | No I don't look anything like her but I do like to hear "Unspun w/ AnnaZ")
To: Destro
(I highly reccommend this book by John and Frank.)
Frank Schaeffer, who converted to Orthodoxy, (I believe after his father's death,) tells a story. Francis was in a Catholic hospital in Philadelphia and there was a Crucifix on the wall. He was asked if he wanted it removed. He said to leave it.
Don't know the signifigance of that, but I believe I have heard that Frank says that he believes that had his Father lived, he would have become Orthodox also.
Which resonates with me, because he was a disciplined thinker and well able to analyze and debunk the illogic of postmodern thought. No, he was not a "theologian" in the Protestant definition. But, I think Frank is saying that his intellectual honesty would have lead him to Orthodoxy
But, IMHO, he was tending to theology in the tradition of Orthodox Christianity, which involves learning the truth by direct experience rather than avademic methodology.
fwiw
53 posted on
08/31/2003 4:42:36 AM PDT by
don-o
To: Destro
"Orthodox tried to stick with their liturgy, not change to fit the fashions of the day," Schaeffer said. "Orthodoxy has not tried to keep up with every passing fashion and make itself 'relevant.' It is much more relevant because it doesn't change." How can Truth "change?" Thank you for the ping, Destro!
58 posted on
09/03/2003 10:58:19 AM PDT by
betty boop
(Bohr is brutally realistic in epistemological terms. -- Kafatos & Nadeau)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson