The first argument I ever encountered by an SSPX apologist, in fact the very argument that led me into their schism, was a citation of Pope St. Pius Vs sixteenth-century papal bull Quo Primum Tempore. In a nutshell, the SSPX proponent claimed that St. Pius V promulgated the Tridentine Mass in perpetuity, meaning for all time. The SSPX claimed and I found the claim convincing at the time that every priest has the right to use the Roman Missal codified by St. Pius V in Quo Primum Tempore, and that this right cannot be taken away from him.
1 posted on
01/20/2003 6:03:26 AM PST by
NYer
To: All
2 posted on
01/20/2003 6:08:16 AM PST by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: .45MAN; AKA Elena; Angelus Errare; Aquinasfan; Aristophanes; ArrogantBustard; Askel5; Barnacle; ...
The Substance of Catholic Tradition
In my journey back to the Church, through the grace of God Ive been led from the mere accidents of Catholic Tradition to the substance of Catholic Tradition. Although I enjoy the reformed liturgy of Pope Paul VI, which I now recognize as the normative liturgy of the Latin Church, Im as firmly committed to preservation of the 1962 liturgical missal today as I was during my time in the Lefebvre movement. However, I realize that our liturgical tradition as Catholics cannot be preserved apart from John Paul II and all the other legitimate successors of St. Peter. For his voice is the voice of Catholic Tradition in the Church today a Tradition that has been passed down to him by Christ and the Apostles.
3 posted on
01/20/2003 6:08:55 AM PST by
NYer
To: NYer
Dear NYer,
Very nice post, but don't be surprised if we see ad hominem attacks on Mr. Vere.
sitetest
5 posted on
01/20/2003 6:33:03 AM PST by
sitetest
(No good deed goes unpunished.)
To: NYer
What does this prove?
To: NYer
In resolving this question, I came to the personal conclusion that Christ has a sense of humor, since the same text from Catholic Tradition the SSPX quotes in defense of this claim is the very text that refutes it.
Bump.
8 posted on
01/20/2003 6:57:19 AM PST by
Desdemona
To: NYer
bump for later
10 posted on
01/20/2003 7:02:38 AM PST by
St.Chuck
To: NYer
"Listen to what Dom Nau says of the Ordinary Magisterium:
"The infallibility of the Ordinary Magisterium, whether of the Universal Church or of the See of Rome, is not that of a judgment, nor that of an act to be considered in isolation, as if it could itself provide all the light necessary for it to be clearly seen. It is that of the guarantee bestowed on a doctrine by the simultaneous or continuous convergence of a plurality of affirmations or explanations; none of which could bring positive certitude if it were taken by itself alone. (Pope or Church, p.18)
"Consequently, there are some statements in the documents of Vatican II that belong to the Ordinary Magisterium, and that are infallibly true. These are the doctrinal statements that simply repeat what the Church has everywhere and always taught. However, there are many other statements that do not do this, and that do not belong to the Ordinary Magisterium, but rather to the Authentic Magisterium, which simply means that they authentically come from the Council or Pope who has authority in the Church. Under normal circumstances they would be accepted with reverence, but never as infallible. At the present time, it is clear that many of these are radical modernist novelties, such as religious liberty, ecumenism, collegiality and the adaptation of the Church to the modern world. Since they are clearly in direct contradiction to infallible statements of the Solemn and Ordinary Magisterium, these novelties can and must be refused."
Father Peter Scott, SSPX
To: NYer
Finally got a chance to read this. Excellent post. Your subsequent posts on this thread are even better. God bless you.
95 posted on
01/20/2003 4:57:00 PM PST by
St.Chuck
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson