Posted on 01/04/2003 7:01:21 AM PST by xzins
I don't think so.
I think I'm interested in the bible answer to the question.
We are not under law.
We are free.
There is no requirement. Therefore, as you say, we are to give out of love for God.
Now, which do Christian will be better taught, the one who is made to "feel" as if he is guilty of robbing God if his giving doesn't total 10%? Or the Christian who is taught that he is free and should give joyously, cheerfully, and out of love for God?
It's clear to me. Those pastors who insist on legalistic answers are themselves too worried about the money in the offering plate.
I would basically agree with what you say here.
I'd only amend it by changing "tithing" to I do believe that COMMITTED SACRIFICIAL giving reflects the heart of the saved...
Luk 11:42 But woe to you, Pharisees! For you tithe mint and rue and every herb, and pass over judgment and the love of God. You ought to have done these, and not to leave the other undone.
Christ tells the Pharisees that they ought to have tithed, but they messed up when it came to judging others and loving God.
It's also interesting that nobody has brought up Hebrews chapter 7 (at least I don't think anyone has).
In Hebrews the author makes the case that tithing to the Levitical priesthood has been replaced by tithing to a new priesthood, one where Christ is the high priest. He brings up how Abraham tithed to Melchizedek even though Melchizedek wasn't a member of the tribe of Levi.
In the new testament in other places it's clear that Paul, as a minister of Christ, was supported by believers at certain times in his ministry and that finacial aid and support of members was common.
So I think it's absolutely biblical, but it IS voluntary. It wasn't voluntary under the Levites. That being said I think it really is the truest test of whether one puts money above God or not.
If he never wanted burnt offerings, then do you agree that they were not effective in atoning for sin?
Do you agree that they were a spiritual "looking forward" to the one true sacrifice that would be eternally effective?
It cannot be "voluntary free-will" if it is a legally required 10th, can it?
Churches do not weasel out of any civic duty.
The constitution specifically says that government must NOT restrict the free exercise of religion. It also says that government cannot establish a state church.
1. To take any percent of the money I give to God is specifically LESSENING the intent for which I gave it.
2. They are then telling me HOW I must spend a portion of my giving to God. To the extent that it goes for what THEY want instead of what I want, it is them telling me how to worship.
2.
The actual phrase used when tithing was first instituted was a tenth of their "increase". I'm with you. We never see the money that the government takes from us involuntarily. It's not an "increase". In a very real way that tax money taken is also a type of tithe. It's partly used to help the poor and needy which, if I remember right, Israel was commanded to do with their tithes.
Hebrews 7:18The former regulation is set aside because it was weak and useless 19(for the law made nothing perfect), and a better hope is introduced, by which we draw near to God. You are correct in saying that the OT tithe is positively spoken of. You are also correct in saying that it would now be voluntary.
lol...oops. I should learn to read the whole thread. Nice job.
no it doesn't
I practice tithing 10%. Though I don't believe tithing is required of the NT church, the example of giving is obvious. As has already been said, it's all His anyway. My pastor preaches the verses in Malachi as being applicable to the NT church. Personally I give not because I'm required to, but because I want a full-time pastor, outreach ministries, missions, etc.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.