Seven you are staring with a false premesis and building on that
Eve did not bring the fruit to Adam. Adam had violated the responsibility that God had given to him
Gen 1:26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth
Adam stood next to Eve and watched the interaction between Eve and the serpent..
Gen 3:6 And when the woman saw that the tree [was] good for food, and that it [was] pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make [one] wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.
Adam had dominion over that serpent and he could have told it to leave and it would have had to. Instead he allowed his wife to see if the warning of God was true..He made no attempt to stop her..(he had dominion over her as her husband)
If we fast forward to the temptation of Christ we see Him refuse the temptation that befell the 1st Adam (lust of the eyes,lust of the flesh and the pride of life)
Just as Adam had a choice so did Jesus , to speculate that he was without choice violates the word of God
Mat 26:53 Thinkest thou that I cannot now pray to my Father, and he shall presently give me more than twelve legions of angels?
Jesus had a choice and He expressed it
Jhn 5:30 I can of mine own self do nothing: as I hear, I judge: and my judgment is just; because I seek not mine own will, but the will of the Father which hath sent me.
For his pleasure were all things created~ That does not mean he takes pleasure in destruction and judgement. Considering the cost, I say that things were improved, by his creation.
No God does not take pleasure , but His Holiness and Justice demands it. He Does take pleasure in the glory that comes to Him from those judgements..
Isa 45:6 That they may know from the rising of the sun, and from the west, that [there is] none beside me. I [am] the LORD, and [there is] none else.
My premise here is that the Cross could not be avoided. It was part of the original plan in which the choice was already made. Christ had many chances to bypass the Cross: (Matt 26:54) "But how then shall the scriptures be fulfilled, that thus it must be?"
When satan fell, he lost something of his ability to choose, otherwise he could repent and change everything. Adam also could no longer choose to have fellowship God. A slave to sin can not choose to be free. The work here was incumbent on God.
"Adam stood next to Eve and watched the interaction between Eve and the serpent."
I had not thought of this before. I could be persuaded, but I think your argument needs help. The Genesis account of the fall is really a parable and Christ , as is so often the case, is the main character.("...they are they that testify of me"). Quite often in scripture, we know enough about the real thing, (Christ), to fill in some of the blanks in the symbol(Adam). In this case, God was gone from the scene, he came looking for them later. I doubt whether Adam or Eve would have eaten the fruit had God been there, just as I doubt that Eve would have been deceived had Adam been there. This is not a powerful arguement, but the little details have a way adding up. There is so much going on here but, I must get back to work. I enjoy your posts.