[Ronaldus Magnus]

Thank you. I did see this week's "World Over" episode which you referred to. Although I am usually impressed with Dean Hudson when I see him on television, but I just can't shake a nagging doubt about the editorial intent of his magazine.

[american colleen]

"editorial intent" of anyone is usually over my head, I have to admit. But I do like Mr. Hudson although I don't agree with everything he says or does.

I thank God for Michael Rose and his book. Personally, I believe most of what he wrote, but there are a few facts that may be incorrect or at least partially true and partially false. I'm thinking of the "MTV" priest down in Rhode Island and also the stuff about Mr. Kellyani (sp) - Mr. Rose should probably clean those things up with a preface in any new editions.

His book was timely and informative and eye-opening and a lot of respected, orthodox, "in the know" Catholics endorse it, good enough for me! The back and forth stuff I read at least every other week in magazines and blogs drives me nuts. I'm not sure what it accomplishes.