All I KNOW is that Rose's thesis is absolutely correct, and that he's talked with a few (or more) individuals who support it.I agree. Catholicguy mentined that “’Crisis’ also pleaded those FEW errors be corrected so they could enthusiastically promote Rose's important work.” I think I’ve said the same here, that I’d like to see him issue a second edition even better than the first. That I disagree with the one action doesn’t mean I disagree with the whole. His thesis (as I understand it anyway) is correct, we all know it.
God bless,
patent +AMDG
The sad fact is that there was a whole lot of print "full of sound and fury,signifying nothing". Amazing!! What do you think?
I think that all of the reviews weren't worth one short paragraph between them. Two seemed to be so personal that I was rather embarassed reading them. I would have expected Crisis to have done an article about the pitiful state of the Louvain seminary,defending the indefensible is hardly what I expect from Crisis. The Sunday Visitor was kind of par for their course,I think they never quite know where they are headed.
With regards Johannson and his Bishop,I think Rose and his lawyer just cut to the chase.There is only so much time one has to spend and they probably knew that after sending a letter which would ge lost in the bureaucracy they would have ended up sending the first letter they sent anyway. Saved time,saved money.