You evidently have never been party to legal action.
It is SOP for an attorney to advise his client to ZIP THE LIP about ANYTHING having to do with a legal action, once initiated (and the letter sent is the initiation.)
Rose cannot send documents or emails if he is properly advised by counsel.
His article defending his work is proper, BTW. Johansen fired a round, now it's Rose's turn.
Seems fair to me.
LOL. Do you realize what I spend 8-10 hours a day doing? (or 14, of late) Perhaps not.He won’t even respond to e-mails, much less support his actionsYou evidently have never been party to legal action.
It is SOP for an attorney to advise his client to ZIP THE LIP about ANYTHING having to do with a legal action, once initiated (and the letter sent is the initiation.)No, the letter is not an initiation of a legal action. A legal action is a term of art. The letter can lead to a legal action, but until a complaint and summons issue, it is not one. As to SOP, if he had been told to zip his lip, what is with his willingness to be interviewed by NOR? Sure talks to them.
Rose cannot send documents or emails if he is properly advised by counsel.LOL, contrast that with your next statement about his article, which so far as I can tell is a document he sent:
His article defending his work is proper, BTW. Johansen fired a round, now it's Rose's turn.Which is it, can he send documents or not? It appears he is, at best, somewhat selective about who he talks to, not about what subjects he discusses.
patent +AMDG