I shared you comments with a very close friend, who also knows BBarcaro quite well. Here's two comments from him. He who worked with Rose on the matters regarding our own diocese mentioned in his book:
I saw Rose's commentary regarding Johannsen. As I read it this priest was out to destroy Rose, which was Rose's contention.
I personally find it hard to believe that a man who has been so careful with all of his other books would all of a sudden be sloppy about one with such a sensitive topic. That doesn't fit Michael Rose's modus operandi as I'm aware of it.
GM
***
I will speak from what I know personally about Michael Rose. I gave Mr. Rose every opportunity to use all of the information from my website through which I personally lived regarding the crap going on in our diocese. He chose NOT, I repeat, NOT to do that, preferring to let the heretic David J. Brown and our bishop's support of him hang themselves. To me, that speaks a lot for the prudential judgment about how Rose approached his book.
GM
By the way, Brian Barcaro is in the midst of law school finals, so I don't expect to talk to him or get a response this week.
I shared you comments with a very close friend, who also knows BBarcaro quite well. Here's two comments from him. He who worked with Rose on the matters regarding our own diocese mentioned in his book:
My concern, at least at the moment, is more on his threat to the Bishop. He has never denied he did this, nor has he explained why. Not that it matters, there is really only one reason why.
By the way, Brian Barcaro is in the midst of law school finals, so I don't expect to talk to him or get a response this week.
LOL. I have a feeling I understand. Actually, I’m about in the same boat right now. I got about 4 hours of sleep over the weekend, and am shortly running on empty. My blood stream is pure Mountain Dew at the moment.
Dominus Vobiscum
patent +AMDG