Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Luther's 95 Thesis Happy Reformation Day
http://www.gty.org/~phil/history/95theses.htm ^ | Martin Luther

Posted on 10/31/2002 2:46:58 PM PST by Wrigley

Project Wittenberg Disputation of Doctor Martin Luther on the Power and Efficacy of Indulgences by Dr. Martin Luther, 1517

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Martin Luther - Project Wittenberg

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disputation of Doctor Martin Luther on the Power and Efficacy of Indulgences by Dr. Martin Luther (1517)

Published in:

Works of Martin Luther: Adolph Spaeth, L.D. Reed, Henry Eyster Jacobs, et Al., Trans. & Eds. (Philadelphia: A. J. Holman Company, 1915), Vol.1, pp. 29-38 _______________

[10] [20] [30] [40] [50] [60] [70] [80] [90] Out of love for the truth and the desire to bring it to light, the following propositions will be discussed at Wittenberg, under the presidency of the Reverend Father Martin Luther, Master of Arts and of Sacred Theology, and Lecturer in Ordinary on the same at that place. Wherefore he requests that those who are unable to be present and debate orally with us, may do so by letter.

In the Name our Lord Jesus Christ. Amen.

1. Our Lord and Master Jesus Christ, when He said Poenitentiam agite, willed that the whole life of believers should be repentance.

2. This word cannot be understood to mean sacramental penance, i.e., confession and satisfaction, which is administered by the priests.

3. Yet it means not inward repentance only; nay, there is no inward repentance which does not outwardly work divers mortifications of the flesh.

4. The penalty [of sin], therefore, continues so long as hatred of self continues; for this is the true inward repentance, and continues until our entrance into the kingdom of heaven.

5. The pope does not intend to remit, and cannot remit any penalties other than those which he has imposed either by his own authority or by that of the Canons.

6. The pope cannot remit any guilt, except by declaring that it has been remitted by God and by assenting to God's remission; though, to be sure, he may grant remission in cases reserved to his judgment. If his right to grant remission in such cases were despised, the guilt would remain entirely unforgiven.

7. God remits guilt to no one whom He does not, at the same time, humble in all things and bring into subjection to His vicar, the priest.

8. The penitential canons are imposed only on the living, and, according to them, nothing should be imposed on the dying.

9. Therefore the Holy Spirit in the pope is kind to us, because in his decrees he always makes exception of the article of death and of necessity.

10. Ignorant and wicked are the doings of those priests who, in the case of the dying, reserve canonical penances for purgatory.

11. This changing of the canonical penalty to the penalty of purgatory is quite evidently one of the tares that were sown while the bishops slept.

12. In former times the canonical penalties were imposed not after, but before absolution, as tests of true contrition.

13. The dying are freed by death from all penalties; they are already dead to canonical rules, and have a right to be released from them.

14. The imperfect health [of soul], that is to say, the imperfect love, of the dying brings with it, of necessity, great fear; and the smaller the love, the greater is the fear.

15. This fear and horror is sufficient of itself alone (to say nothing of other things) to constitute the penalty of purgatory, since it is very near to the horror of despair.

16. Hell, purgatory, and heaven seem to differ as do despair, almost-despair, and the assurance of safety.

17. With souls in purgatory it seems necessary that horror should grow less and love increase.

18. It seems unproved, either by reason or Scripture, that they are outside the state of merit, that is to say, of increasing love.

19. Again, it seems unproved that they, or at least that all of them, are certain or assured of their own blessedness, though we may be quite certain of it.

20. Therefore by "full remission of all penalties" the pope means not actually "of all," but only of those imposed by himself.

21. Therefore those preachers of indulgences are in error, who say that by the pope's indulgences a man is freed from every penalty, and saved;

22. Whereas he remits to souls in purgatory no penalty which, according to the canons, they would have had to pay in this life.

23. If it is at all possible to grant to any one the remission of all penalties whatsoever, it is certain that this remission can be granted only to the most perfect, that is, to the very fewest.

24. It must needs be, therefore, that the greater part of the people are deceived by that indiscriminate and highsounding promise of release from penalty.

25. The power which the pope has, in a general way, over purgatory, is just like the power which any bishop or curate has, in a special way, within his own diocese or parish.

26. The pope does well when he grants remission to souls [in purgatory], not by the power of the keys (which he does not possess), but by way of intercession.

27. They preach man who say that so soon as the penny jingles into the money-box, the soul flies out [of purgatory].

28. It is certain that when the penny jingles into the money-box, gain and avarice can be increased, but the result of the intercession of the Church is in the power of God alone.

29. Who knows whether all the souls in purgatory wish to be bought out of it, as in the legend of Sts. Severinus and Paschal.

30. No one is sure that his own contrition is sincere; much less that he has attained full remission.

31. Rare as is the man that is truly penitent, so rare is also the man who truly buys indulgences, i.e., such men are most rare.

32. They will be condemned eternally, together with their teachers, who believe themselves sure of their salvation because they have letters of pardon.

33. Men must be on their guard against those who say that the pope's pardons are that inestimable gift of God by which man is reconciled to Him;

34. For these "graces of pardon" concern only the penalties of sacramental satisfaction, and these are appointed by man.

35. They preach no Christian doctrine who teach that contrition is not necessary in those who intend to buy souls out of purgatory or to buy confessionalia.

36. Every truly repentant Christian has a right to full remission of penalty and guilt, even without letters of pardon.

37. Every true Christian, whether living or dead, has part in all the blessings of Christ and the Church; and this is granted him by God, even without letters of pardon.

38. Nevertheless, the remission and participation [in the blessings of the Church] which are granted by the pope are in no way to be despised, for they are, as I have said, the declaration of divine remission.

39. It is most difficult, even for the very keenest theologians, at one and the same time to commend to the people the abundance of pardons and [the need of] true contrition.

40. True contrition seeks and loves penalties, but liberal pardons only relax penalties and cause them to be hated, or at least, furnish an occasion [for hating them].

41. Apostolic pardons are to be preached with caution, lest the people may falsely think them preferable to other good works of love.

42. Christians are to be taught that the pope does not intend the buying of pardons to be compared in any way to works of mercy.

43. Christians are to be taught that he who gives to the poor or lends to the needy does a better work than buying pardons;

44. Because love grows by works of love, and man becomes better; but by pardons man does not grow better, only more free from penalty.

45. 45. Christians are to be taught that he who sees a man in need, and passes him by, and gives [his money] for pardons, purchases not the indulgences of the pope, but the indignation of God.

46. Christians are to be taught that unless they have more than they need, they are bound to keep back what is necessary for their own families, and by no means to squander it on pardons.

47. Christians are to be taught that the buying of pardons is a matter of free will, and not of commandment.

48. Christians are to be taught that the pope, in granting pardons, needs, and therefore desires, their devout prayer for him more than the money they bring.

49. Christians are to be taught that the pope's pardons are useful, if they do not put their trust in them; but altogether harmful, if through them they lose their fear of God.

50. Christians are to be taught that if the pope knew the exactions of the pardon-preachers, he would rather that St. Peter's church should go to ashes, than that it should be built up with the skin, flesh and bones of his sheep.

51. Christians are to be taught that it would be the pope's wish, as it is his duty, to give of his own money to very many of those from whom certain hawkers of pardons cajole money, even though the church of St. Peter might have to be sold.

52. The assurance of salvation by letters of pardon is vain, even though the commissary, nay, even though the pope himself, were to stake his soul upon it.

53. They are enemies of Christ and of the pope, who bid the Word of God be altogether silent in some Churches, in order that pardons may be preached in others.

54. Injury is done the Word of God when, in the same sermon, an equal or a longer time is spent on pardons than on this Word.

55. It must be the intention of the pope that if pardons, which are a very small thing, are celebrated with one bell, with single processions and ceremonies, then the Gospel, which is the very greatest thing, should be preached with a hundred bells, a hundred processions, a hundred ceremonies.

56. The "treasures of the Church," out of which the pope. grants indulgences, are not sufficiently named or known among the people of Christ.

57. That they are not temporal treasures is certainly evident, for many of the vendors do not pour out such treasures so easily, but only gather them.

58. Nor are they the merits of Christ and the Saints, for even without the pope, these always work grace for the inner man, and the cross, death, and hell for the outward man.

59. St. Lawrence said that the treasures of the Church were the Church's poor, but he spoke according to the usage of the word in his own time.

60. Without rashness we say that the keys of the Church, given by Christ's merit, are that treasure;

61. For it is clear that for the remission of penalties and of reserved cases, the power of the pope is of itself sufficient.

62. The true treasure of the Church is the Most Holy Gospel of the glory and the grace of God.

63. But this treasure is naturally most odious, for it makes the first to be last.

64. On the other hand, the treasure of indulgences is naturally most acceptable, for it makes the last to be first.

65. Therefore the treasures of the Gospel are nets with which they formerly were wont to fish for men of riches.

66. The treasures of the indulgences are nets with which they now fish for the riches of men.

67. The indulgences which the preachers cry as the "greatest graces" are known to be truly such, in so far as they promote gain.

68. Yet they are in truth the very smallest graces compared with the grace of God and the piety of the Cross.

69. Bishops and curates are bound to admit the commissaries of apostolic pardons, with all reverence.

70. But still more are they bound to strain all their eyes and attend with all their ears, lest these men preach their own dreams instead of the commission of the pope.

71. He who speaks against the truth of apostolic pardons, let him be anathema and accursed!

72. But he who guards against the lust and license of the pardon-preachers, let him be blessed!

73. The pope justly thunders against those who, by any art, contrive the injury of the traffic in pardons.

74. But much more does he intend to thunder against those who use the pretext of pardons to contrive the injury of holy love and truth.

75. To think the papal pardons so great that they could absolve a man even if he had committed an impossible sin and violated the Mother of God -- this is madness.

76. We say, on the contrary, that the papal pardons are not able to remove the very least of venial sins, so far as its guilt is concerned.

77. It is said that even St. Peter, if he were now Pope, could not bestow greater graces; this is blasphemy against St. Peter and against the pope.

78. We say, on the contrary, that even the present pope, and any pope at all, has greater graces at his disposal; to wit, the Gospel, powers, gifts of healing, etc., as it is written in I. Corinthians xii.

79. To say that the cross, emblazoned with the papal arms, which is set up [by the preachers of indulgences], is of equal worth with the Cross of Christ, is blasphemy.

80. The bishops, curates and theologians who allow such talk to be spread among the people, will have an account to render.

81. This unbridled preaching of pardons makes it no easy matter, even for learned men, to rescue the reverence due to the pope from slander, or even from the shrewd questionings of the laity.

82. To wit: -- "Why does not the pope empty purgatory, for the sake of holy love and of the dire need of the souls that are there, if he redeems an infinite number of souls for the sake of miserable money with which to build a Church? The former reasons would be most just; the latter is most trivial."

83. Again: -- "Why are mortuary and anniversary masses for the dead continued, and why does he not return or permit the withdrawal of the endowments founded on their behalf, since it is wrong to pray for the redeemed?"

84. Again: -- "What is this new piety of God and the pope, that for money they allow a man who is impious and their enemy to buy out of purgatory the pious soul of a friend of God, and do not rather, because of that pious and beloved soul's own need, free it for pure love's sake?"

85. Again: -- "Why are the penitential canons long since in actual fact and through disuse abrogated and dead, now satisfied by the granting of indulgences, as though they were still alive and in force?"

86. Again: -- "Why does not the pope, whose wealth is to-day greater than the riches of the richest, build just this one church of St. Peter with his own money, rather than with the money of poor believers?"

87. Again: -- "What is it that the pope remits, and what participation does he grant to those who, by perfect contrition, have a right to full remission and participation?"

88. Again: -- "What greater blessing could come to the Church than if the pope were to do a hundred times a day what he now does once, and bestow on every believer these remissions and participations?"

89. "Since the pope, by his pardons, seeks the salvation of souls rather than money, why does he suspend the indulgences and pardons granted heretofore, since these have equal efficacy?"

90. To repress these arguments and scruples of the laity by force alone, and not to resolve them by giving reasons, is to expose the Church and the pope to the ridicule of their enemies, and to make Christians unhappy.

91. If, therefore, pardons were preached according to the spirit and mind of the pope, all these doubts would be readily resolved; nay, they would not exist.

92. Away, then, with all those prophets who say to the people of Christ, "Peace, peace," and there is no peace!

93. Blessed be all those prophets who say to the people of Christ, "Cross, cross," and there is no cross!

94. Christians are to be exhorted that they be diligent in following Christ, their Head, through penalties, deaths, and hell;

95. And thus be confident of entering into heaven rather through many tribulations, than through the assurance of peace.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


TOPICS: General Discusssion; History; Religion & Culture; Theology
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 341-346 next last
To: RnMomof7
No purgatory is a car wash..you go you get cleaned by a little bit of burning....YOU YOU YOU

God bless you, Terry, but you are helplessly ignorant. If the Potter puts His clay into a kiln, to burn off the waste and to perfect the pot, is that a "work" of the clay pot?

Seriously, think about it, please.

SD

61 posted on 11/01/2002 8:24:45 AM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
Dave how can an INFALLIBLE church make that kind of "mistake" that needs "correcting"? How can a church that is led by the Holy Spirit and is charged with interpretation of the word and will of God make that kind of an error?

How can a church that is infallible NOT listen when a man led of God asks them to look at this error?


Luther a man of God? My church is wrong...you need to get out of myth and face facts..

He condoned polygamy...(Scandal of Philip of Hesse, he used lying and vulgar language that was a repulsed by his fellow Protestant Leaders...On scripture he said Job was actually a fable...Ecc was not complete and too incoherent...Solomon didn't writre his book...thought the story of Johan was monstrous and incrediable..he rejected the canon Hebrews, James, Jude and the Apocalypse..how about the Peasant Revolt of 1525...he said to mow them down, slaughter and stab them openly or in secret...and they were slaughtered 100,000 men killed..He said the Jews would be tormented in Hells deepest depth...he was anti-semite...understanding Nazism is two things...history and influence of Luther..He said Moses was an enemy of Jesus Christ...called them the stupid Ten Commandments...a drunk...and far worst...some actually thought he was possessed.
62 posted on 11/01/2002 8:28:07 AM PST by Irisshlass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
Dave you want to finish what Jesus Christ could not do..The word of God is clear that he paid the price for you..He paid a price you could never pay

The cross was not about YOU ..it was about the wrath of God against man . The only thing that could elimate that wrath was death..and even the death of a man was not enough..only God dying himself could satisfy that wrath..and you think a few years of you burning it off will make you worth to stand in HIS presence?

Tts 3:5 Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost;

Rom 3:27 Where [is] boasting then? It is excluded. By what law? of works? Nay: but by the law of faith.

I love the Potter and the Clay ..It speaks to the sovereignity of God...

Rom 9:21 Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?

    Rom 9:22   [What] if God, willing to shew [his] wrath, and to make his power known, endured with much longsuffering the vessels of wrath fitted to destruction:

     Rom 9:23   And that he might make known the riches of his glory on the vessels of mercy, which he had afore prepared unto glory,

     Rom 9:24   Even us, whom he hath called, not of the Jews only, but also of the Gentiles?

A wonderful Calvinist analogy:>)

63 posted on 11/01/2002 8:42:02 AM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: ksen
More tidbits from Father Luther:

7. God remits guilt to no one whom He does not, at the same time, humble in all things and bring into subjection to His vicar, the priest.

When was the last time you "subjected" yourself to a priest?

38. Nevertheless, the remission and participation [in the blessings of the Church] which are granted by the pope are in no way to be despised, for they are, as I have said, the declaration of divine remission.

Lots of folks aroudn here are "despising" these things.

15. This fear and horror is sufficient of itself alone (to say nothing of other things) to constitute the penalty of purgatory, since it is very near to the horror of despair.

16. Hell, purgatory, and heaven seem to differ as do despair, almost-despair, and the assurance of safety.

Here is Luther's main problem -- he is afraid of Purgatory, because he has a false conception of it. Purgatory is not "almost-despair," it is "near-to-joy." Purgatory will have sadness, as our sinful bits are removed, as we are revealed for what we truly are. But there is great joy in knowing that the end result is eternal bliss.

SD

64 posted on 11/01/2002 8:46:51 AM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
Terry, it seems today's question you will not answer is this:

If the Potter puts His clay into a kiln, to burn off the waste and to perfect the pot, is that a "work" of the clay pot?

That's two. Care to answer?

SD

65 posted on 11/01/2002 8:48:01 AM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
Is that what the scripture says? Please cite the verse that says He burns off the waste to make it perfect for use..Having done ceramics I know you do not do that ..but show me the scripture

  
  Jer 18:1   The word which came to Jeremiah from the LORD, saying,
  
  Jer 18:2   Arise, and go down to the potter's house, and there I will cause thee to hear my words.
  
  Jer 18:3   Then I went down to the potter's house, and, behold, he wrought a work on the wheels.
  
  Jer 18:4   And the vessel that he made of clay was marred in the hand of the potter: so he made it again another vessel, as seemed good to the potter to make [it].
  
  Jer 18:5   Then the word of the LORD came to me, saying,
  
  Jer 18:6   O house of Israel, cannot I do with you as this potter? saith the LORD. Behold, as the clay [is] in the potter's hand, so [are] ye in mine hand, O house of Israel.
  
  Jer 18:7   [At what] instant I shall speak concerning a nation, and concerning a kingdom, to pluck up, and to pull down, and to destroy [it];
  
  Jer 18:8   If that nation, against whom I have pronounced, turn from their evil, I will repent of the evil that I thought to do unto them.
  
  Jer 18:9   And [at what] instant I shall speak concerning a nation, and concerning a kingdom, to build and to plant [it];
  
  Jer 18:10   If it do evil in my sight, that it obey not my voice, then I will repent of the good, wherewith I said I would benefit them.
  
  Jer 18:11   Now therefore go to, speak to the men of Judah, and to the inhabitants of Jerusalem, saying, Thus saith the LORD; Behold, I frame evil against you, and devise a device against you: return ye now every one from his evil way, and make your ways and your doings good.
66 posted on 11/01/2002 2:23:54 PM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
Nonsense. One has to buy everything that Luther said, beginning with his own pecular interpretation of Scripture. The cotrine deals with the moral condition of mankind as he is. Calvin solved the problem by supposing that the Elect were the tiny minority of truly religious people that he saw. Some evangelicals following him and simply sought to gather in the Elect' Wesley, like most evangelicals simply fudged on the issue and his successors have ignored it all together by abandoning all theologizing on the matter. In what way do they differ from the Liberals, who deny the reality of evil altogether?
67 posted on 11/01/2002 8:18:13 PM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
Incoherent post.
68 posted on 11/01/2002 8:47:26 PM PST by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: drstevej
Sorry, this was deleted. "The doctrine of purgatory deals with man as we see him, neither saintly nor diabolical but morally confused. What distinguishes the saved from the damned is the persistence of faith. Whatever the evident behavior of the individual, he remains in his heart of hearts faithful and prepared to pay the price of his actions. Some Protestants seems to place purgatory on earth; the Catholic at the moment of death, when he undergoes his judgement. But it is hard to tolerate the evil that even the "good"do, when the devil seems to be ascendent in the Church in both high and low places as well as in the world"
69 posted on 11/01/2002 9:05:54 PM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
*** Some Protestants seems to place purgatory on earth***

Which Protestants? Explain.

***But it is hard to tolerate the evil that even the "good"do, when the devil seems to be ascendent in the Church in both high and low places as well as in the world***

More incoherence.
70 posted on 11/02/2002 4:37:07 AM PST by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS; drstevej
The doctrine of purgatory deals with man as we see him, neither saintly nor diabolical but morally confused

It is irrevelent how YOU or I see anyman. It is how God sees the man..and a man that is covered in the blood of Christ has a right standing before God..He sees the righteousness of Christ when he sees a saved man.

71 posted on 11/02/2002 6:24:37 AM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
That is the theory you have adopted. The problem is that it demands that we believe we can see what God sees. We have a hard enough time searching our own hearts and discovering what is there. All we can do is to throw ourselves on the mercy of the Court, knowing that HE has been tempted as we were and was brought to the brink himself.
72 posted on 11/02/2002 10:46:45 AM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
You have adopted the theory that someone else will see more clearly than you and follow like what ever they say without question

Hbr 12:2 Looking unto Jesus the author and finisher of [our] faith; who for the joy that was set before him endured the cross, despising the shame, and is set down at the right hand of the throne of God.

Jhn 16:13 Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, [that] shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come.

Either Jesus spoke the truth or he lied...

73 posted on 11/02/2002 10:59:57 AM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
The theory you have adopted is not your own but simply what was elucidated by the Reformers. Every revolutionary becomes the father of a new orthodoxy.
74 posted on 11/02/2002 11:36:29 AM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
Was Jesus a revolutionary?
75 posted on 11/02/2002 11:46:11 AM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
No, but Luther was and you are reading Jesus's words through similar spectacles.
76 posted on 11/02/2002 11:55:14 AM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
You do not think Jesus was a revoluntary? You need to read the bible
77 posted on 11/02/2002 12:19:55 PM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
How can the rightful rule of Israel be a revolutionary? The priests of the temple who refused to recognize him were revolutionaries.
78 posted on 11/02/2002 12:23:13 PM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
Why did they hang Him?
79 posted on 11/02/2002 12:24:25 PM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
Why did the tenants kill the rightful heir?
80 posted on 11/02/2002 12:28:00 PM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 341-346 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson