Your post # 88 was dealt with in my post # 93. I find it too incoherant to dissect and respond to.
In a previous post you were whining about the ossuary being found by "a muslim" (like somehow that invalidates it or something). So I replied that the Dead Sea Scrolls were found by a Muslim. To which YOU responded QUOTE: "Of what possible relevance are the Dead Sea Scrolls?"
I can't respond to somebody that can't follow a conversation logically.
Are dinosaurs unScriptural and therefore non-existent? Render for us in Aramaic: The quick brown fox jumped over the lazy dog. Nothing terribly complicated there. Nothing terribly complicated about your refusal to answer two simple questions either.
Your big problem is that the members of the oldest and largest and original Christian Church are not lapping at your feet and rendering to you the status of expert at quite the level you claim for yourself.
I feared you were heading toward sola Dead Scrolla.
What invalidates as evidence the magical mystery box or boxtop as the case may be of the desert sands is the absolute lack of even a contemporary chain of evidence and the fact that people will feel a bit more respectful when the inscrutable secret and unknowable Muslim buyer and seller(s) are a bit more forthcoming as to how they obtained it and the present owner is willing to allow scholarly examination by those not captive "scholars".
If you can't respond to someone like you imagine me to be, don't respond lest we think you can.