Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vatican Says "No" to US Bishops; Announcement Friday
Spirit Daily/Catholic World News ^ | Oct 16 2002 | Vatican

Posted on 10/17/2002 12:27:16 PM PDT by Irisshlass

VATICAN, Oct 16, 02 (CWNews.com) -- Despite the strenuous lobbying efforts of American bishops, the Vatican has reached a final decision not to approve the sex-abuse policy adopted by the US bishop at their June meeting in Dallas.

The Vatican response to the American bishops' policy-- which has been heavily anticipated and hotly debated-- will be announced on Friday morning, at a press conference hosted by Bishop Wilton Gregory, the president of the US bishops' conference.

Although the Vatican response will praise the American bishops for their commitment to end the sex-abuse scandal, that response will not include the "recognitio" that is necessary to make the "Dallas policy" authoritative.

Since the American bishops' policy involves changes in the canon law that governs Church policies, the Dallas norms cannot take effect without Vatican approval. That approval will not be forthcoming.

The Vatican has instead called for the formation of a joint commission, composed of both Vatican officials and American bishops, to address the defects of the Dallas policy.

After the US bishops adopted their proposal in June, the leaders of the US bishops' conference predicted quick approval from the Vatican. In August, however, CWN broke the news that the Vatican was planning to reject the American policy. In recent weeks several American prelates have visited Rome, with the apparent goal of convincing Vatican officials that the US norms deserved approval.

Last week, the Vatican postponed plans for an announcement on the issue, to await the arrival of Bishop Gregory and other top USCCB officials in Rome for regular meetings. Although he had previously said that he would not have any public announcement on the topic, Bishop Gregory has now scheduled a news conference for Friday noon.

Canon-law experts in Rome viewed the American bishops' policy as defective because the proposed norms did not provide "due process" safeguards for priests who are accused of sexual misconduct. Vatican experts also complained that the Dallas policy used a vague and imprecise definition of sexual abuse.

These complaints have gained force as numerous American priests have complained that they have been falsely accused, or denied an adequate opportunity to prove their innocence, after being hit with sex-abuse charges.


TOPICS: Catholic
KEYWORDS: abuse; canonlaw; cathoilc; priest; scandal; sex; vatican

1 posted on 10/17/2002 12:27:16 PM PDT by Irisshlass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Irisshlass
We'll have to wait and see what the joint commission comes up with. Maybe they'll take on more than fixing the Bishop's policy...
2 posted on 10/17/2002 1:36:12 PM PDT by WriteOn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Irisshlass
Praise the Lord! Thank God for the present Roman Curia and Pope John Paul II.
3 posted on 10/17/2002 2:07:03 PM PDT by Renatus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renatus
I totally agree :)
4 posted on 10/17/2002 2:23:51 PM PDT by Irisshlass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Irisshlass; maryz
As I wrote last June, the Bishops passed a flawed "Charter" which they knew Vatican would reject. This way, they could crow before the media that "We did the best we could, but Rome has blocked our path. We will be unable to take any further action until we set up a new committee which will draw up a new proposal which cannot be debated or voted upon until our next regularly scheduled meeting, etc." Meanwhile they will (foolishly) "wait for the story to die down" (it won't).

The American bishops were counting on this rejection; this was all choreographed last June, simply to buy time.

5 posted on 10/17/2002 11:19:13 PM PDT by Dajjal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dajjal
The American bishops were counting on this rejection; this was all choreographed last June, simply to buy time.

What are they buying time for?
6 posted on 10/18/2002 6:05:38 AM PDT by Irisshlass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Irisshlass
Many (most?) of the bishops imagine that if they can stall long enough, the public will "grow bored" of the Scandal, and it will drift off the front pages of the newspaper to the back pages, where they will able to act with less public scrutiny.
7 posted on 10/18/2002 5:46:30 PM PDT by Dajjal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dajjal
I see..well it didn't work..
8 posted on 10/18/2002 6:07:42 PM PDT by Irisshlass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dajjal
Many (most?) of the bishops imagine that if they can stall long enough, the public will "grow bored" of the Scandal, and it will drift off the front pages of the newspaper to the back pages, where they will able to act with less public scrutiny.

Nope. The bishops want Rome's intervention so that the sex abuse issue, from here on out, is Rome's problem. Whatever the policies are, Rome will give the bishops cover.

It appears that Rome will be less coercive, and will even reinstitute some priests who have been removed.

It's now Rome's problem, and Rome will get the blame it it fails.

9 posted on 10/18/2002 6:37:19 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
SOME people are not going to be happy, because the bishops have been providing them cover, namely liberal college presidents and the heads of certain religious orders. And suppose that a Pius XIII succeeds John Paul.
10 posted on 10/18/2002 6:44:20 PM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
I agree (see Post #5).

11 posted on 10/18/2002 6:46:43 PM PDT by Dajjal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
And suppose that a Pius XIII succeeds John Paul.

I suspect you'll never see another pope named "Pius."

12 posted on 10/18/2002 6:53:23 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Spoken like a true "First worlder" I am, and have been for sometime, been inclined to the view of Phil Jenkins that the future of Christianity is not in Europe and North America. I think the pope also believes this. Africa seems to us a basket case, but it has some of the same barbaric vigor of medieval Europe. And, like Jacques Barzun, I think our "modern" civilization is entering a period of decadence.
13 posted on 10/18/2002 7:13:58 PM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
I suspect you'll never see another pope named "Pius."

They used to say the same thing about "John."

14 posted on 10/19/2002 5:07:33 AM PDT by Dajjal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson