Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins
You are mistaken. I am not a calvinist. Why did you think I am a calvinist?

I didn't. I know you're not. I was just pointing out that they have no problem with God being arbitrary.

SD

770 posted on 10/03/2002 7:28:15 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 767 | View Replies ]


To: SoothingDave; fortheDeclaration
I continue to like the 1st assumption better. Why?

1. God sent Christ to SAVE sinners. (Rescue them.)
2. Those who believe in Christ pass immediately from death to life. (They get rescued.)
3. His name is the only name under which RESCUE will happen...."no other name...whereby we must be SAVED (Rescued.)
4. A rescue is definite whereas responding to the law in the heart involves life-long obedience. I'd far rather be rescued (saved.)

Therefore, I'd think God would get a rescue ship to the aborigine in deepest out-back land.

He's already shown that he's able and willing to do that.

771 posted on 10/03/2002 7:35:32 AM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 770 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson