Replies

The line of David HAS to pass through Solomon So then there can never be a King or Messiah right? Your Talmid is all a lie. All the prophecies are a lie ,all the promises to David were a lie...you have no hope..perhaps no God

Uh, what is this supposed to be? Are these your words, or something you are pasting?

The line of David HAS to pass through Solomon

Yes, that is correct. Which might explain why Matthew makes sure to get this detail right.

When your days are fulfilled and you lie down with your fathers, I will raise up your offspring after you, who shall come forth from your body, and I will establish his kingdom.
He shall build a house for my name, and I will establish the throne of his kingdom for ever. (2 Samuel 7:12-13)

Which son of David built the temple? Solomon. Note the promise to establish the throne of (Solomon's) kingdom forever.

When your days are fulfilled to go to be with your fathers, I will raise up your offspring after you, one of your own sons, and I will establish his kingdom.
He shall build a house for me, and I will establish his throne for ever.
I will be his father, and he shall be my son; I will not take my steadfast love from him, as I took it from him who was before you,
but I will confirm him in my house and in my kingdom for ever and his throne shall be established for ever.'" (1 Chronicles 17:11-14)

The same promise, even more strongly stated. Also:

He shall build a house for my name. He shall be my son, and I will be his father, and I will establish his royal throne in Israel for ever.' (1 Chronicles 22:10)

So then there can never be a King or Messiah right?

Wrong. Why would you think that?

Your Talmid is all a lie.

It is Talmud. Have you read it? On what basis do you say that it is "all a lie"?

All the prophecies are a lie ,all the promises to David were a lie...you have no hope..perhaps no God

Yes, I know. You think this of pretty much everybody who doesn't interpret scripture exactly as you do.

In other words, the curse would only apply to the physical offspring of Jehoiachin.

Yes, that is correct.

So, though the Bible doesn’t explicitly say that Eli was Mary’s father, it implies such, and other early writings confirm this opinion.

Hoo boy is this a stretch. It is true that Luke doesn't explicitly say that Heli was Mary's father. The reason it doesn't is because it explicitly says that Heli is Joseph's father!! Can you refer to any genealogical record in the Hebrew or Christian scriptures which refers to a man as the son of his father-in-law? And there is no verse in the Christian scriptures which states that Mary is the daughter of Heli.

The first is that an adopted son can inherit all the rights and privileges that would be available to a natural son.

Not the priesthood or kingship. The author conflates lineal privilege with property inheritance. Again, if you can offer a scriptural counterexample, please do so.