[Itsfreewill]

Anyone who can give these Dictator's of Religious Terrorists, an irritation is find with me. They run out of town any one that calls their bluff!

They YELP AND HOWL all over the place when someone has another point of view!

These religious Terrorist are of little faith! For no other voices are be heard unless at expence for entertainment to this band of Zealots!(drstevej; P-Marlowe; RnMomof7;Frumanchu; Wrigley; xzins;)

Look what they did to Stikywings, and AP!

If the bullies can reek havoc, why not Grant provoking thoughts?

[xzins]

If the bullies can reek havoc, why not Grant provoking thoughts?

REEK Havoc and let fly the dogs of War!!! (the smell of gunpowder in the air??)

[drstevej]

religious terrorists??? that's a silly notion, IFW.

which of grant's 15 threads in three days do you want to post to? feel free to do so. the fact that grant wants to post his ideas and will not respond to any critique make the designation of spam for his threads reasonable.

care to explain what I did to stickwings (please document!)? If not I will ignore this comment as mere whining.

[Frumanchu]

I considered not dignifying this post with a response, but you've named and attacked me personally. I cannot and will not speak on behalf of the others you've named, but frankly I find you comment offensive to the point of nausea. I try as much as possible to present my arguments graciously and respectfully, and I have never maintained a "join us or die" attitude as you seem to suggest.

My issue with Grant has to do with his unwillingness to defend or even discuss his views as posted in the flood of vanity articles he's posted. I do not know the reasons behind his refusal to do so, but this forum is not his own personal magazine for him to spread his gospel. His views and positions cannot rest merely on his educational background or his publishing history...many other in here who differ with his views hold similar credentials.

If he is willing to spend more time discussing his articles and less time posting his 2000+ works, I will be more than happy to engage him in discussion/debate in a gracious manner. Until and unless that happens, I move to have a warning issued, and if he doesn't heed it to have his posting rights revoked.

I find it almost amusing that you're accusing us of trying to run him out as a dissenting voice when all we've been calling for is to speak and engage us...

[RnMomof7]

I am offend at this...the problem is with little bomb throwers . Hit and run ..no apolegetics..no information just disruption or as in the case of old Grant here stir the pot then let it burn..

So are you sticky? Are you AP??

[Wrigley]

Nice attempt at a group smear. Feel free to comment and more than likely agree with any of grant's posts. He'll probably respond to you. He posts and runs and doesn't want to discuss. We begged him to stick around and discuss, he chose not to. His loss.

How close to stickywings are you?

[P-Marlowe]

Anyone who can give these Dictator's of Religious Terrorists, an irritation is find with me.

For no other voices are be heard unless at expence for entertainment to this band of Zealots.

Well said.

Ah, another Harvard boy, huh? Interesting useage of the present perfect subjunctive mood.