I used to drive 90 miles one way to the Indult mass in Miami. One doesn't do that to attend a Liturgy one hates. It is clear who is engaged in hate here, Bud.<>
A proposition contrary to these doctrines can be qualified as erroneous or, in the case of teachings of the prudential order, as rash or dangerous and therefore "tuto doceri non potest". (Cardinal Rzatzinger Commentary of Professio Fidei)
<. It is a characteristic of those on the losing end of an arguement that they seek to divert attention the issue at hand.
The issue a thand is there is NO warrant for a Catholic to reject parts or whole of an Ecumenical Council.
It is characteristic of schsimatics to get bogged down in minituae, accidents, side issues, and they often miss the substantial forest of Unity for the green sapling sprouting peripheral leaves.
As in every other instance, the schismatics and those that succor them are left without an arguement.<>
Why, then, do you wish that the next Pope abolishes the Indult?
I used to drive 90 miles one way to the Indult mass in Miami.
Is that the period when you were flirting with schism?
One doesn't do that to attend a Liturgy one hates.
Do you still attend this liturgy, and if not why not?