Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Catholicguy
"So this matter was not settled prior to VCII. The Council’s work indeed confirmed the opinion of modern theologians and authoritatively settled the question. On that basis, the subdiaconate and the minor orders were suppressed. Such a momentous decision inexorably altering the Church’s discipline must therefore be considered infallible."

Your man is here talking complete nonsense. The subdiaconate was not suppressed by the Council at all so this issue cannot be a test of whether V II made any infallible decisions. The subdiaconate was actually suppressed by Paul VI in 1972 in his apostolic letter Ministeria Quaedam i.e. 7 YEARS AFTER THE COUNCIL CLOSED.

There certainly were infallible decisions made by the Council in the decrees that were issued in Sacrosanctum concilium and Christus Dominus. Decrees are disciplinary in nature and not doctrinal. The whole point is that the Council made no DOCTRINAL DEFINITIONS - again as Ratzinger has already pointed out.

215 posted on 09/27/2002 1:29:04 PM PDT by Tantumergo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies ]


To: Tantumergo
Agreed that disciplinary/regulatory decisions are NOT doctrinal--this is why liturgical decisions are ALSO not infallible.
217 posted on 09/27/2002 1:37:59 PM PDT by ninenot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson