THE CHAUVIN SHUFFLE!!Neither do you have 'proof' that 5:10 is speaking of 20:4 and only of 20:4. You're mere 'claim' of 'proof' doesn't cut it. You have to show this is only the case.
Of course, if you notice the fact that, according to John's vision, 20:6 is a future event to John's position in the vision and if you notice the fact that it meshes perfectly with 5:10, you will notice that 5:10 is indeed giving you a glimpse of the ~new~ Earthly reality described in 22:5!
Yup, x, Proof! LOL!
And your 'spin' of 1 Cor 15 is laughable just like your 'discovery' of the "millennial kingdom" in Isaiah 65 and your bastardization of 2 Peter 3.
1 Corinthians 15:24 concludes the resurrection with the ~FACT~ that the ~END~ is next. Not a "millennial kingdom"! The ~END~.
Furthermore, 1 Cor 15 tells us that 'death' will be destroyed at that resurrection, yet your "millennial kingdom" has death occurring thoughtout. This is contradictory. And again, I must point out that your insistance that Isaiah 65 is a description of the "millennial kingdom" (contrary to the explit reference to "The New Heavens and the New Earth") and your insistance that this must be interpreted literally requires us to conclude that ~God's~ people will live only as long as trees and then die. This is contradictory to the claim of Pre-Millennialists that there will be no death of ~God's~ people in the "millennial kingdom".
You really ought to be ashamed of yourself.
Jean
THE CHAUVIN SHUFFLE!!