[theAmbassador]

...(I gotta do it Ambassador)...

Hey, no problem. I had actually planned to handle it differently and come back to Isaiah 65, but it seems as if the Lord actually had something else in mind for xzins. It does appear at this point as if the Lord is removing His hand of restraint from xzins and allowing him to do that which is unfitting.

This actually demonstrates just how contemptibly some of these Premillennialists handle the Word. It takes someone carnally stupid to actually insist upon a literal reading of a passage and then call it a "lie from the pit of hell" when someone actually reads that passage the way the Premillennialists insists. I'm sure that all the lurkers out there are taking note of who is careful with the word and who gets a hair's width from actually Blaspheming the Word.

It should be a wake-up call for all Premillennialists to note just how warped it is to insist upon reading passages like Isaiah 65 the way that they do. It will blow up in their face every single time.

[xzins]

Let's clarify.

The dying from Is 65 happens where?

Jean said it happened in the new heavens and the new earth. That is heresy.

I said it happens to those still in earthly bodies during the millennial reign of Christ. That is biblical.

Are you on the side of dying taking place in the New Heavens and New Earth? Is that your biblical position? Or are you on the side of this being another "symbol?" The comedy of symbols of amillennialism. At the end, everything is a symbolic....heaven, earth, satan, trees, rivers, gold, angels, return, Christ, God.....all the way to symbolic salvation.

With your interpretive method it is no longer possible to interpret anything in the bible. Everytime a difficulty crops up.....just make it a symbol.

[the_doc]

It takes someone carnally stupid to actually insist upon a literal reading of a passage and then call it a "lie from the pit of hell" when someone actually reads that passage the way the Premillennialists insists.

BUMP.