To: xzins; Jerry_M; RnMomof7; drstevej; the_doc; Jean Chauvin
The basic point is that Rev 20 clearly states 2 resurrections that are separated by a thousand years. These control John 5; not the other way around.
Hey, Jerry, with arguments like this for your position, I'd stay on the sidelines as well.
Of course, you know that my goal this year was not to find an eschatological view, but to discover what the gospel is.
I just happen to believe that Christ must reign [over the kingdom of God] until He has put all enemies under His feet. And the end will come when He delivers the kingdom to God the Father and He will put an end to all rule and all authority and power.
It is a pity, though, as input from our thoughtful PreMill group would be nice....
21 posted on
09/12/2002 9:19:40 AM PDT by
CCWoody
To: CCWoody
i'm not jerry????
22 posted on
09/12/2002 9:25:17 AM PDT by
xzins
To: CCWoody
Hey Woody it was not long ago that you were pretty much without a position on all this stuff. Did the word of God change your mind or the power of personalities?
30 posted on
09/12/2002 10:02:11 AM PDT by
RnMomof7
To: CCWoody
I just happen to believe that Christ must reign [over the kingdom of God] until He has put all enemies under His feet. Ever consider that He has already put all enemies under His feet when he rose up from the dead?
God sent the Son for two reasons.
1. To defeat death.
2. To establish the Church.
101 posted on
09/12/2002 6:48:47 PM PDT by
don-o
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson