Spurgeon's View of the MILLENNIUM

Pilgrim Pub. ^ | MARK A. MCNEIL

[xzins]

---

CONFUSED ABOUT SPURGEON'S PROPHETIC VIEWS?

— WELL, NO LONGER!  HERE IS...

. Charles Haddon Spurgeon's VIEW OF THE
MILLENNIUM
	Annotated Summary by
	MARK A. MCNEIL

"I am not now going into millennial theories, or into any speculation as to dates. I do not know anything at all about such things, and I am not sure that I am called to spend my time in such researches. I am rather called to minister the gospel than to open prophecy. Those who are wise in such things doubtless prize their wisdom, but I have not the time to acquire it, nor any inclination to leave soul-winning pursuits for less arousing themes. I believe it is a great deal better to leave many of these promises, and many of these gracious out-looks of believers, to exercise their full force upon our minds, without depriving them of their simple glory by aiming to discover dates and figures. Let this be settled, however, that if there be meaning in words, Israel is yet to be restored. Israel is to have a SPIRITUAL RESTORATION or a CONVERSION."

[from The Restoration & Conversion of the Jews MTP Vol 10, Year 1864, pg. 429, Ezekiel 37:1-10 (age 30)]

INTRODUCTION

There has been some considerable difference of opinion regarding the position that C. H. Spurgeon, the great Baptist preacher from the 19th century, held in the area of Eschatology — regarding the doctrine of the Millennium. Each of the three major divisions within this area of doctrine have proponents who claim Spurgeon as one of their own. Many times authors claim a different millennial view than what Spurgeon actually believed.

It is not our task to sort out the arguments for each view. Such an assignment would take a very large volume (many are available) and the issue would still not be solved for all. We would simply like to define the basic positions and then demonstrate from Spurgeon's own words which one view he held.

PREMILLENNIALISM

The first view regarding the Millennium is that of PREMILLENNIALISM. The prefix, "Pre," denotes "before." The prefix is telling us at what point in relationship to the millennium that Christ will come. This view holds that our Lord will Literally return before a 1,000-year reign of Christ begins. The millennium of Revelation 20 is taken to be literal. If not literal, it at least is speaking of an indefinite period of time following the coming of Christ during which there will be perfect peace on the earth.

Within the premillennialist camp, there have come to be two identifiable views: the "dispensationalist" position, and the "historic" position. For further information defending each of these views, one should consult Reese's The Approaching Advent of Christ [historic] and Dwight Pentecost's Things to Come [dispensational]. Though the differences between the two are important, it is not within the scope of our purpose here to delve into such matters.

AMILLENNIALISM

The second view is called AMILLENNIALISM, or sometimes called "realized eschatology". The prefix, "A-," means "no". This would suggest that those who hold this view do not believe in a millennium. This is somewhat misleading, however. This view is the the product of a consistent Spiritual interpretation of prophetic literature. To those, the millennium is not some future physical reign, but the present reign of Christ in the hearts of believers. The "millennium" is an indefinite period of time (the present age) after which Christ will physically return. Prophecy in the Church, by Oswald Allis, is a standard work for the amillennial position.

This is the position of the Roman Catholic Church, also many other Protestant denominations. It grew out of St. Augustine's spiritualizing of these issues in his writings, and the tendency of many early Christian writers to see the Church as the "new Israel" and therefore the recipient of the promises of the Old Testament for the Jewish nation. Those who hold this view do not speak of the millennium as a future happening.  It is, to them, a Present Reality.

POSTMILLENNIALISM

The third, and last, major view is that of POSTMILLENNIALISM. The prefix "Post" speaks of "after." This teaching promotes the view that the physical return of Christ will Follow an actual millennium. The influence of Christianity will over-take the world for an extended period of time, then Christ will return.

This view appears to be a mixture of the principles that work to produce the first two views. It is not consistently spiritual or literal in its interpretation of the prophetic material relevant to this issue. Perhaps the foremost writing for this position today is The Millennium, by Loraine Boettner.

Spurgeon's VIEW  

With basic definitions before us, then, let's look at some quotes from Spurgeon to see what his position was on the Millennium.

"If I read the word aright, and it is honest to admit that there is much room for difference of opinion here, the day will come, when the Lord Jesus will descend from heaven with a shout, with the trump of the archangel and the voice of God. Some think that this descent of the Lord will be Post-millennial — that is, 'after the thousand years' of his reign. I CANNOT THINK SO. I conceive that the advent will be PRE-millennial — that He will come first; and then will come the millennium as the result of his personal reign upon earth. But whether or no, this much is the fact, that Christ will suddenly come, come to reign, and come to judge the earth in righteousness." [from Justification & Glory MTP Vol 11, Year 1865, pg. 249, Romans 8:30 (age 31)]

Spurgeon here specifically identifies the Postmillennial view with a clear DENIAL of any adherence to it! Those who attempt to claim Spurgeon for this viewpoint do not demonstrate their contention by referring to clear comparisons such as this one. They rather go to sermons not specifically dealing with both positions and pull out of them ideas that are "compatible" with Postmillennial thinking. This is a faulty way of proving a point, however* — especially when they meet squarely with a Spurgeon statement like the one above, and those below.

*NOTE: Furthur, a few postmillennialists (especially GARY NORTH), are guilty of misrepresenting Spurgeon constantly in articles and books; NORTH has repeatedly alleged that "Spurgeon was Postmillennial" — yet neither his supplied quotations "say" so, and/or he deliberately does not present a statement by Spurgeon that North will speculate "implies" a Postmillennial position. Our advice is to ignore anything North states regarding Spurgeon's views and Prophecy!

Again, consider Spurgeon's View here in light of 'Postmillennial' teaching...

"Paul does not paint the future with rose-colour: he is no smooth-tongued prophet of a golden age, into which this dull earth may be imagined to be glowing. There are sanguine brethren who are looking forward to everything growing better and better and better, until, at last, this present age ripens into a millennium. They will not be able to sustain their hopes, for Scripture gives them no solid basis to rest upon. We who believe that there will be no millennial reign without the King, and who expect no rule of righteousness except from the appearing of the righteous Lord, are nearer the mark. Apart from the second Advent of our Lord, the world is more likely to sink into a pandemonium than to rise into a millennium. A divine interposition seems to me the hope set before us in Scripture, and, indeed, to be the only hope adequate to the occasion. We look to the darkening down of things; the state of mankind, however improved politically, may yet grow worse and worse spiritually." [from The Form of Godliness Without the Power MTP Vol 35, Year 1889, pg. 301, 2 Timothy 3:5 (age 54)]

"We are to expect the literal advent of Jesus Christ, for he himself by his angel told us, 'This same Jesus which is taken up from you into heaven shall so come in like manner as ye have seen him go into heaven,' which must mean literally and in person. We expect a reigning Christ on earth; that seems to us to be very plain, and to be put so literally that we dare not spiritualise it. We anticipate a first and a second resurrection; a first resurrection of the righteous, and a second resurrection of the ungodly, who shall be judged, condemned, and punished for ever by the sentence of the great King." [from Things to Come MTP Vol 15, Year 1869, pg. 329, 1 Corinthians 3:22 (age 35)]

Here, stress is laid upon the Literal Nature of the second coming.  Also, after this literal return is stressed a reigning upon the earth.

"We have done once for all with the foolish ideas of certain of the early heretics, that Christ's appearance upon earth was but a phantom. We know that he was really, personally, and physically here on earth. But it is not quite so clear to some persons that he is to come really, personally, and literally, the second time. I know there are some who are labouring to get rid of the fact of a personal reign, but as I take it, the coming and the reign are so connected together, that we must have a spiritual coming if we are to have a spiritual reign. Now we believe and hold that Christ shall come a second time suddenly, to raise his saints at the first judgment, and they shall reign with him afterwards. The rest of the dead live not till after the thousand years are finished. Then shall they rise from their tombs at the sounding of the trumpet, and their judgment shall come and they shall receive the deeds which they have done in their bodies." [from The Two Advents of Christ MTP Vol 8, Year 1862, pg. 39, Hebrews 9:27-28 (age 28)]

[from The Sinner's End MTP Vol 8, Year 1862, pgs. 712-713, Psalms 73:17-18 (age 28)], Spurgeon is discussing the final condition of the sinner — "Let us go on to consider their end. The day of days, that dreadful day has come. The millennial rest is over, the righteous have had their thousand years of glory upon earth."

In the quotes above, the order of events fits perfectly the PREmillennial point of view. The final end of the sinner is faced after the righteous have enjoyed a thousand years with Christ.

.
	"Our Hope is the Personal PRE-MILLENNIAL RETURN of the   Lord Jesus Christ in Glory."
	— August 1891, age 58

Of the various articles and writings by those who deny the conclusion that we feel is obvious, none that I have found bases itself on the same type of quotes we have produced (many others could have been given — see those that follow). To the contrary, their's are based on "interpreting" Spurgeon's statements apart from such quotes that we have given.

.

We feel safe in concluding, then,

that of the three views we began with,

Spurgeon expressly states that he believes in a

Literal Return of Jesus Christ

BEFORE

a Literal Millennium on the Earth.

———————————————————————————

.

Written by Mark A. McNeil (Houston TX USA), B.A., M.A., & PhD. Student

Author of An Evaluation of the 'Oneness Pentecostal' Movement

$3 + $1 shipping — Published by Pilgrim Publications

— also Read C. H. SPURGEON on "PRETERISM" <<< Click Link

  Join our company... Psalm 68:11 "The Lord gave the WORD:

Great was the COMPANY of those that PUBLISHED it."

Please, Copy this article, pass it on, and mail to others.

Permission granted by Bob L. Ross — No Copyright

NOTES OF INTEREST

Watching and Waiting Magazine

                                          by C. W. H. Griffiths

Published by Sovereign Grace Advent Testimony

1 Donald Way, Chelmsford, Essex CM2 9JB United Kingdom

Stephen A. Toms, secretary

— Write and Request the Complete Article            

From the Summer 1990 issue of this magazine, C. W. H. Griffiths states Spurgeon "was a valued standard bearer for historic Pre-millennialism," and then presents an excellent article defending his Pre-millennial position.

Documenting additional quotations which we have added and expanded below —

Spurgeon (age 43) — There is moreover to be a reign of Christ. I cannot read the Scriptures without perceiving that there is to be a pre-millennial reign, as I believe, upon the earth and that there shall be new heavens and a new earth wherein dwelleth righteousness...

Spurgeon (age 49) — Then all His people who are alive at the time of His coming shall be suddenly transformed, so as to be delivered from all the frailties and imperfections of their mortal bodies: The dead shall be raised incorruptible and we shall be changed. Then we shall be presented spirit, soul, and body without spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing; in the clear and absolute perfection of our sanctified manhood, presented unto Christ Himself.

Spurgeon (age 50) — When the Lord comes there will be no more death; we who are alive and remain (as some of us may be — we cannot tell) will undergo a sudden transformation — for flesh and blood, as they are, cannot inherit the kingdom of God — and by that transformation our bodies shall be made meet to be partakers of the inheritance of the saints in light.

Spurgeon (age 52) — His coming will cause great sorrow. What does the text say about his coming? All kindreds of the earth shall wail because of Him. Then this sorrow will be very general.

Spurgeon (age 30) [from The Restoration & Conversion of the Jews MTP Vol 10, Year 1864, pgs. 427-430, Ezekiel  37:1-10] — Under the preaching of the Word the vilest sinners can be reclaimed, the most stubborn wills can be subdued, the most unholy lives can be sanctified. When the holy "breath" comes from the four winds, when the divine Spirit descends to own the Word, then multitudes of sinners, as on Pentecost's hallowed day, stand up upon their feet, an exceeding great army, to praise the Lord their God. But, mark you, this is not the first and proper interpretation of the text; it is indeed nothing more than a very striking parallel case to the one before us. It is not the case itself; it is only a similar one, for the way in which God restores a nation is, practically, the way in which he restores an individual. The way in which Israel shall be saved is the same by which any one individual sinner shall be saved. It is not, however, the one case which the prophet is aiming at; he is looking at the vast mass of cases, the multitudes of instances to be found among the Jewish people, of gracious quickening, and holy resurrection. His first and primary intention was to speak of them, and though it is right and lawful to take a passage in its widest possible meaning, since "no Scripture is of private interpretation," yet I hold it to be treason to God's Word to neglect its primary meaning, and constantly to say — "Such-and-such is the primary meaning, but it is of no consequence, and I shall use the words for another object." The preacher of God's truth should not give up the Holy Ghost's meaning; he should take care that he does not even put it in the back ground. The first meaning of a text, the Spirit's meaning, is that which would be brought out first, and though the rest may fairly spring out of it, yet the first sense should have the chief place. Let it have the uppermost place in the synagogue, let it be looked upon as at least not inferior, either in interest or importance, to any other meaning which may come out of the text.

The meaning of our text, as opened up by the context, is most evidently, if words mean anything, first, that there shall be a political restoration of the Jews to their own land and to their own nationality; and then, secondly, there is in the text, and in the context, a most plain declaration, that there shall be a spiritual restoration, a conversion in fact, of the tribes of Israel.

The promise is that they shall renounce their idols, and, behold, they have already done so. "Neither shall they defile themselves any more with their idols." Whatever faults the Jew may have besides, he certainly has no idolatry. "The Lord thy God is one God," is a truth far better conceived by the Jew than by any other man on earth except the Christian. Weaned for ever from the worship of all images, of whatever sort, the Jewish nation has now become infatuated with traditions or duped by philosophy. She is to have, however, instead of these delusions, a spiritual religion: she is to love her God. "They shall be my people, and I will be their God." The unseen but omnipotent Jehovah is to be worshipped in spirit and in truth by his ancient people; they are to come before him in his own appointed way, accepting the Mediator whom their sires rejected; coming into covenant relation with God, for so our text tells us — "I will make a covenant of peace with them," and Jesus is our peace, therefore we gather that Jehovah shall enter into the covenant of grace with them, that covenant of which Christ is the federal head, the substance, and the surety. They are to walk in God's ordinances and statutes, and so exhibit the practical effects of being united to Christ who hath given them peace. All these promises certainly imply that the people of Israel are to be converted to God, and that this conversion is to be permanent, for the tabernacle of God is to be with them, the Most High is, in an especial manner, to have his sanctuary in the midst of them for evermore; so that whatever nations may apostatize and turn from the Lord in these latter days, the nation of Israel never can, for she shall be effectually and permanently converted, the hearts of the fathers shall be turned with the hearts of the children unto the Lord their God, and they shall be the people of God, world without end.

We look forward, then, for these two things. I am not going to theorize upon which of them will come first, whether they shall be restored first, and converted afterwards, or converted first, and then restored. They are to be restored, and they are to be converted too. Let the Lord send these blessings in his own order, and we shall be well content whichever way they shall come. We take this for our joy and our comfort, that this thing shall be, and that both in the spiritual and in the temporal throne, the King Messiah shall sit, and reign among his people gloriously.

Spurgeon (age 30) [from The Lamb — the Light MTP Vol 10, Year 1864, pg. 439, Revelation 21:23] — (Spurgeon says of the millennial earth), They shall not say one to another, "Know the Lord: for all shall know him, from the least to the greatest." There may be even in that period certain solemn assemblies and Sabbath-days, but they will not be of the same kind as we have now; for the whole earth will be a temple, every day will be a Sabbath, the avocations of men will all be priestly, they shall be a nation of priests — distinctly so, and they shall day without night serve God in his temple, so that everything to which they set their hand shall be a part of the song which shall go up to the Most High. Oh! blessed day. Would God it had dawned, when these temples should be left, because the whole world should be a temple for God. But whatever may be the splendours of that day — and truly here is a temptation to let our imagination revel — however bright may be the walls set with chalcedony and amethyst, however splendid the gates which are of one pearl, whatever may be the magnificence set forth by the "streets of gold," this we know, that the sum and substance, the light and glory of the whole will be the person of our Lord Jesus Christ, "for the glory of God did lighten it, and the Lamb is the light thereof." Now, I want the Christian to meditate over this. In the highest, holiest, and happiest era that shall ever dawn upon this poor earth, Christ is to be her light. When she puts on her wedding garments, and adorns herself as a bride is adorned with jewels, Christ is to be her glory and her beauty. There shall be no ear-rings in her ears made with other gold than that which cometh from his mine of love; there shall be no crown set upon her brow fashioned by any other hand than his hands of wisdom and of grace. She sits to reign, but it shall be upon his throne; she feeds, but it shall be upon his bread; she triumphs, but it shall be because of the might which ever belongs to him who is the Rock of Ages. Come then, Christian, contemplate for a moment thy beloved Lord. Jesus, in a millennial age, shall be the light and the glory of the city of the new Jerusalem. Observe then, that Jesus makes the light of the millennium, because his presence will be that which distinguishes that age from the present. That age is to be akin to paradise. Paradise God first made upon earth, and paradise God will last make. Satan destroyed it; and God will never have defeated his enemy until he has re-established paradise, until once again a new Eden shall bless the eyes of God's creatures. Now, the very glory and privilege of Eden I take to be not the river which flowed through it with its four branches, nor that it came from the land of Havilah which hath dust of gold — I do not think the glory of Eden lay in its grassy walks, or in the boughs bending with luscious fruit — but its glory lay in this, that the "Lord God walked in the garden in the cool of the day." Here was Adam's highest privilege, that he had companionship with the Most High. In those days angels sweetly sang that the tabernacle of God was with man, and that he did dwell amongst them. Brethren, the paradise which is to be regained for us will have this for its essential and distinguishing mark, that the Lord shall dwell amongst us. This is the name by which the city is to be called — Jehovah Shammah, the Lord is there. It is true we have the presence of Christ in the Church now — "Lo, I am with you always, even unto the end of the world." We have the promise of his constant indwelling: "Where two or three are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them." But still that is vicariously by his Spirit, but soon he is to be personally with us. That very man who once died upon Calvary is to live here. He — that same Jesus — who was taken up from us, shall come in like manner as he was taken up from the gazers of Galilee. Rejoice, rejoice, beloved, that he comes, actually and really comes; and this shall be the joy of that age, that he is among his saints, and dwelleth in them, with them, and talketh and walketh in their midst.

"If I read the word aright, and it is honest to admit that there is much room for difference of opinion here, the day will come, when the Lord Jesus will descend from heaven with a shout, with the trump of the archangel and the voice of God. Some think that this descent of the Lord will be Post-millennial — that is, 'after the thousand years' of his reign. I CANNOT THINK SO. I conceive that the advent will be PRE-millennial — that He will come first; and then will come the millennium as the result of his personal reign upon earth. But whether or no, this much is the fact, that Christ will suddenly come, come to reign, and come to judge the earth in righteousness." [from Justification & Glory MTP Vol 11, Year 1865, pg. 249, Romans 8:30 (age 31)]

[JesseShurun]

And Ruth needed her kinsman redeemer on top of it.

[RnMomof7]

Not exactly correct. The women could convert, the men never. It looks like the Lord has laid a parallel between David and Jesus that no man, writing uninspired text, would ever have thought of.

Couldn't or wouldn't??

[JesseShurun]

Matthew's not the dolt some might like to think and the Jews of that time never voiced an objection, only the unlearned ones today who want to use it on unlearned Christians of today.

[theAmbassador]

One of the reasons why I spent two posts denouncing full-preterism is because I want to go on record that amills don’t coddle full-preterists. We regard them as scoffers.

I'll have to go back and read your posts. I'll say that full Preterism and also PostMillennialism present a fairly dangerous heresy in the Reformed Church. Though, I'm not sure how many full Preterists there are among our Reformed churches, PostMillennialism does have a large following. And, sadly, it leaves their followers ill prepared for the tribulation struggles which we will face in this world.

[ksen]

This is kind of off topic but can you recommend a good translation/version of the Tanakh? I have a JPS version but I don't think that one is very good.

Thanks.

[ksen]

My info on the conversion is from the Stone Edition Tanach, Book of Ruth.

Whoops, just saw this.

[JesseShurun]

The Stone Edition is available online from major bookstores. I think even Amazon can refer you to a dealer. I like it as it has the Hebrew opposite the English so you can read both at the same time and decide for yourself if the translation is correct. You're welcome.

[theAmbassador]

Of course, PreMillennialism does have problems as well. These enemies of the Lord will masquerade as believers in this glorious kingdom reign of Christ on this earth. They are double minded and unstable in all their ways. As the Psalter puts it, "because Thy statutes are despised, with overwhelming grief I weep." So much for this "glorious" kingdom.

There will be no vision of God in the face of Jesus Christ in this kingdom. Still only in a glass darkly.

For these reasons, and more, we Reformed Amillennialists don't have any excitement about the possibility that we might be wrong. We would still be groaning with all of creation, as we do today, waiting for the redemption of our bodies and the whole world. (Rom 8:22-23) We would still "cry out day and night to Him" for divine vengeance against those who have slaughtered us. (Luke 18:7, Rom 8:36)

Of course, the PreMillennialists tells us that the only reason we wait, for the Lord can reign glorious on earth or heaven, is so that they can have their 1000 years. In orther words, PreMillennialism is all about man, not the Lord. It is "Much ado about nothing!"

What excites us Amillennialists is that when the Lord returns, it will be THE Day of vengeance of our God where He will flood the earth with fire (2 Peter 3:9). Then, we will shine forth as the sun in the kingdom of our Father.

[jude24]

Of course, the PreMillennialists tells us that the only reason we wait, for the Lord can reign glorious on earth or heaven, is so that they can have their 1000 years. In orther words, PreMillennialism is all about man, not the Lord. It is "Much ado about nothing!"

That may be the biggest non-sequitor I've ever seen.

[xzins]

So when you hear the same sort of argument used against Jesus, just remind them of their own little problem.

Haa! Thanks for clarifying.

Your next line is excellent. "catching a spiritual condition."

[OrthodoxPresbyterian]

You are a partial preterist.. distinguish the difference

FWIW, you are a "Partial Preterist", RnMomof7... that is if you believe that the First Coming did in fact fulfill at least some of the Messianic Prophecies ("Partial Preterism" = "some prophecies fulfilled").

Ergo, as concerns Preterism, ALL "orthodox" Christians are "Partial Preterists" to one degree or another. ALL affirm that SOME Prophecies have been fulfilled, and some are being fulfilled, and some remain to be fulfilled. We are arguing as to the question of which Prophecies have been fulfilled -- but none of us deny the Second Coming (or horrifically back-date the Second Coming, like a massive theological Enron Accounting Fraud, which is what the Hyper-Preterists are in fact doing).

This is why I personally adjudge PreMillenialism and PostMillenialism to be errors of stumbling to the Elect, not precisely a Fatal Heresy.

Charles Spurgeon (PreMillenialist) and RC Sproul (PostMillenialist) have both stumbled in their Eschatology, but I do not believe that their Error of Stumbling was anything so great that we should be concerned for their immortal souls.

Hyper-Preterism, OTOH, is itself a prima facie Fatal Heresy -- or at least a Doctrine of Demons so vile that it irresistibly leads into Fatal Heresy if not recanted.

---

As a point of information, however, I would observe:

• The PreMillenialist Charles Spurgeon singularly failed to identify the fatal error in Hyper-Preterism. He called it "interesting" and "harmless".

• The PostMillenialist RC Sproul has singularly failed to identify the fatal error in Hyper-Preterism, calling it "thought-provoking".

Both of these men, working as they do from errant Esachatologies, were blinded by their Errors to the dangerous Snake in the Garden which is "Hyper-Preterism".

• BY CONTRAST, even the PostMillenialist Loraine Boettner has admitted that while orthodox Presbyterians have a "very strong case" against Hyper-Preterism, in the confessionally-AMILLENIAL orthodox Lutheran church (where the Confession of Amillenialism is a matter of Creedal Church Law) Hyper-Preterists are not even legally entitled to an ecclesial Trial -- Hyper-Preterists are summarily excommunicated, like Muslims or any other essentially Christ-denying Pagan.

Hyper-Preterism advances by deceit.

• To the Post-Millenialist, the Hyper-Preterist appeals to the substance of his heretical eschatology, claiming that he substantially agrees with the PostMillenialist that the Church will inaugurate a "Material Golden Age" on THIS EARTH. And so the PostMillenial RC Sproul listens to the ear-tickling words of the Hyper-Preterist and calls them, "thought-provoking".

• To the Pre-Millenialist, the Hyper-Preterist appeals to the form of his heretical eschatology, claiming that he formaically agrees with the PostMillenialist that the Purpose of Christ's Second Coming is to inaugurate a "Material Golden Age" on THIS EARTH. And so the PreMillenial Charles Spurgeon listens to the ear-tickling words of the Hyper-Preterist and calls them, "interesting" and "harmless".

But the Hyper-Preterist can find no purchase whatsoever in the Soil of Amillenialism. We Amillenialists categorically DENY the Hyper-Preterist (and PostMillenial) vision of a Church-inaugurated "Material Golden Age" on THIS EARTH. And we Amillenialists categorically DENY the Hyper-Preterist (and PreMillenial) vision that the Purpose of Christ's Second Coming is to inaugurate a "Material Golden Age" on THIS EARTH.

The Hyper-Preterist can deceitfully ply his trade with both PostMillenialists and PreMillenialists, by adjusting his language, and altering his presentation. The Hyper-Preterist sorta agrees with the "substance" of PostMillenialism; and he sorta agrees with the "form" of PreMillenialism.

But with the Amillenialist, the Hyper-Preterist enjoys NO COMMON GROUND whatsoever. We do not have "differences" with these fellows like the PreMills and the PostMills; with us Amillenials it is a matter of total, absolute, ferocious and unrelenting Opposition, both in Form and Substance.

Which accounts for the fact that while PreMillenialist and PostMillenialist Creeds may "test" the Teachings of the Hyper-Preterists against their "received confessions", in the confessionally-amillenial orthodox Lutheran creed, Hyper-Preterists are not even entitled to a Church Trial. They are summarily excommunicated -- period.

Hyper-Preterism is the devil's Cobra, in the Garden of Eschatology.
And Amillenialism is God's mongoose.

(While the lesser eschatologies of PostMillenialism and PreMillenialism are, against this snake-ish threat, mere weasels by comparison)

[OrthodoxPresbyterian]

To the Pre-Millenialist, the Hyper-Preterist appeals to the form of his heretical eschatology, claiming that he formaically agrees with the PostMillenialist PreMillenialist that the Purpose of Christ's Second Coming is to inaugurate a "Material Golden Age" on THIS EARTH. And so the PreMillenial Charles Spurgeon listens to the ear-tickling words of the Hyper-Preterist and calls them, "interesting" and "harmless".

Mea Culpa on the typo.

[xzins]

Rn, unless one happens to be a full preterist, then full preterism is viewed as deviant and unsupportable. You don't have to be an amillennialist to see that full preterism is wrong.

In fact, it's impossible for a fully convinced premillennialist to see it otherwise. How in the world could I say that all prophecy has already been fulfilled? Think about it.

[RnMomof7]

Understood..thanks

[xzins]

Scripture, scripture, scripture....

Christ Reigning on the Earth for 1000 Years = Premillennism

Revelation 5:9-10	9 And they sung a new song, saying, Thou art worthy to take the book, and to open the seals thereof: for thou wast slain, and hast redeemed us to God by thy blood out of every kindred, and tongue, and people, and nation; 10 And hast made us unto our God kings and priests: and we shall reign on the earth.	Christians Serving as Kings & PRIESTS who SHALL (FUTURE) reign with Christ on the EARTH
Revelation 20:4-5	4 And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years. 5 But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection.	Resurrected saints (along with those in fine linen Rev 19: 8, 14 same as Rev 5:10) REIGN with Christ a THOUSAND YEARS.
Revelation 20:6	6 Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years.	Christians serving as priests reign with Christ a thousand years
Revelation 20:7-9	Revelation 20 7 And when the thousand years are expired, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison, 8 And shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth, Gog, and Magog, to gather them together to battle: the number of whom is as the sand of the sea. 9 And they went up on the breadth of the earth, and compassed the camp of the saints about, and the beloved city: and fire came down from God out of heaven, and devoured them..	After 1000 years those in Holy City ON EARTH are attacked but enemy is destroyed
Summary	100% Scripture from the Book of Revelation..	Irrefutable 1000 Year Reign of Christ on Earth. Christians serving as priests with Christ for 1000 years ON EARTH. This is the definition of Premillenialism. Anyone who says premillennialism is NOT a valid biblical position is unfair with SCRIPTURE.

[Jerry_M]

Do you really believe that 2488 was a charitable post?

[BlackElk]

I dunno. Looks to me like the raving TRADITIONS of an unauthorized MAN named Spurgeon. Unless, of course, he was a pope and authorized by Christ to contribute to the Magisterium.

[xzins]

You're catholic, right?

What do they believe about the return of Christ? Just curiosity. I really don't know.

[theAmbassador]

Is there any particular part of that post that you object to or is it the entire post?

[Jerry_M]

1. Tone

2. The part about premillenialism being all about man. Most premillenialists I know are vitally interested in the Reign of Christ. They don't view it as "their" 1,000 years, but rather His.