You've murder another thread.
You must be right. After all, I'm the one who has told the Catholics to remove the beam from their arse and I'm the one who has made the "bull-latin" bullus shitus pronouncements. Wait! It is you Romanists who are doing that, trying to impress us with your Romanese vernacular I suppose.
Nevertheless, please explain how this post of mine (quoted for you below) "murdered another thread."
- Acts 1:3 He presented Himself alive after His suffering by many infallible proofs, being seen by them during forty days and speaking of the things pertaining to the kingdom of God.
Yes, CC. What were those things Christ spoke of and where are they discussed in the Bible? What if Christ and/or the Apostles chose/were told to hand down those things by word instead and not by writing them down?
Notice this passage in the Bible: "
And beginning at Moses and all the Prophets, He expounded to them in all the Scriptures the things concerning Himself." (Luke 24:27) Those things are all the things which were already in the Bible at that time (The Law, the Prophets, the Psalms) which Jesus explained about Himself. These are the same things which the Apostles used in the Apostolic preaching of the kingdom of God.
- Acts 28:23 He [paul] explained and solemnly testified of the kingdom of God, persuading them concerning Jesus from both the Law and the Prophets,....
It does seem entirely to be expected that if Jesus explained of Himself and the kingdom of God from the Law and the Prophets and Paul is able to preach the kingdom of God from the Law and the Prophets that I should be able to as well. Plus, as the kingdom of God is the gospel...
- Mark 1:14-15 Jesus came to Galilee, preaching the gospel of the kingdom of God, and saying, "The time is fulfilled and the kingdom of God is at hand. Repent and believe in the gospel."
And as I have in my Bible the Law and the Prophets plus the gospel accounts, where is this "extra" stuff about the kingdom of God that is not in my Bible? And how come my Bible does say that the kingdom of God is preached from the Law and the Prophets and the Psalms (Acts 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, etc.) and
never from this mysterious gospel?
And what are the features of this other gospel, which is evidently another gospel that these Apostles are suppose to have preached? Gosh, they themselves even declare: "
if we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel to you than what we have preached to you, let him be accursed.
- Acts 28:23 He [paul] explained and solemnly testified of the kingdom of God, persuading them concerning Jesus from both the Law and the Prophets,....
God desires from us, more than anything else, a humble and meek heart.
Btw, has anyone ever told you that you are very concrete or literal? I am not trying to be mean, I just wondered.
You know, CC, I am trying to reply to the questions in your post to me, but it is very difficult. You appear to be deeply invested in competitiveness and sarcasm, and you take a simple question and stretch it out into a very long accusation, belaboring the point over and over again.
I cannot understand your ideas about Scripture and Christ, nor can I learn anything from you, when you are so contentious in your presentation and responses.
Can you try just replying and letting me know what the errors are in my post, without all the hyper-text and boldfacing, and just trust that I really might be interested in what you have to say, in plain old type?