Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: RnMomof7
"We see our call to not defend a man or a church , but to defend the Holiness and the Glory of God.."

I don't see anything wrong with defending a man or a church. But that is beside the point. God's Glory and Holiness is not advanced by the repugnant and unscriptural teachings of Calvin on predestination. In bible when God is called "holy" it means that he is moral and just, not capricious like pagan gods. God is the Master of the Universe to be sure, and of course he CAN send us all to hell or save us all or do whatever he wants to do with us. But he is also LOVE. And to reject Calvin's horrific docterine is not to reject the truth that God is soverign.

And bringing up the notion that a Catholic, St. Augustine, also believed in predestination really does not help to advance the cause of Calvin because:

"It is just as difficult to find in the writings of the Fathers a solid argument for an absolute predestination. The only one who might be cited with some semblance of truth is St. Augustine, who stands, however, ALMOST ALONE among his predecessors and successors. Not even his most faithful pupils, Prosper and Fulgentius, followed their master in all his exaggerations. But a problem so deep and mysterious, which does not belong to the substance of Faith and which, to use the expression of Pope Celestine I (d. 432), is concerned with profundiores difficilioresque partes incurrentium quœstionum (cf. Denz., n. 142), cannot be decided on the SOLE authority of Augustine. Moreover, the TRUE opinion of the African doctor is a matter of dispute even among the best authorities, so that ALL parties claim him for their conflicting views."

So Calvin was not in accord with the consensus of Christian thought for the first 1500 years, with the exception of Augustine, and that is indeed an exception and a controversial one at that. And Calvin's theory was rejected by many of his peers for the "tendency of the human reason to revolt against Calvin's decretum horrible. Calvin's reckless tenets had banished charity and mercy from the breasts of his followers and had everywhere aroused a fierce spirit of strife and bloodshed." He who has been reprobated negatively, may exhaust all his efforts to attain salvation: it avail's him nothing. Moreover, in order to realize infallibly his decree, God is compelled to frustrate the eternal welfare of all excluded a priori from heaven, and to TAKE CARE that they die in their sins. Is this the language in which Holy Writ speaks to us? No; there we meet an anxious, loving father, who wills not "that any should perish, but that all should return to penance" (II Pet., iii, 9)."

I have to laugh when NC's resort to defending their notions by quoting the Fathers, that is Sacred Tradition, which they reject. Calvin's formulated a novel and horrible docterine. It is a horrible heresy. I am sorry for those who cling to it. Because as the quote above says, "it has banished charity and mercy from the breasts of his followers." http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/01740c.htm

119 posted on 07/28/2002 9:22:35 PM PDT by Theresa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Theresa
Calvin's formulated a novel and horrible doctrine. It is a horrible heresy. I am sorry for those who cling to it. Because as the quote above says, "it has banished charity and mercy from the breasts of his followers."

Paganistic fatalism, banished at the foot of the cross, one of the most horrible afflictions of mankind, was reintrodocued to Christianity by the twisted mind of Calvin. Truly Horrible. Amen.

125 posted on 07/28/2002 9:39:05 PM PDT by Polycarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]

To: Theresa; CCWoody; the_doc; Matchett-PI; Jean Chauvin; Wrigley; Dr. Eckleburg; irishtenor; ...
But that is beside the point. God's Glory and Holiness is not advanced by the repugnant and unscriptural teachings of Calvin on predestination

Theresa I do not mean to be hurtful or disrespectful to you

BUT YOU think it is repugnant to allow God to do as HE will with HIS creation...but it is just fine to pray to other gods (saints) instead of to Him..you think it is fine that the blood of Christ has no effect ..and still call your self a follower of Christ..

I see the catholics here treat the Pope like HE is GOD and the Church as if IT is God

There is only ONE God..and those that hate Him hate predestination and election because it means their gods are false useless gods and they are damned

177 posted on 07/29/2002 7:07:49 AM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson