Replies

You have no defense for your agenda and orientation that I sniffed-out immediately. Again, ALL you can do is decry how you are treated face to face while you attack the Magisterium using the words of others. I expected nothing less from you.

You really need help. You "sniffed me out", how? I attack how? By posting articles. How amusing. I suppose my posts regards the Anglican Church are attacks too? My posts regards vouchers as well? What do you intend to do, post warnings about me every time I post?

Posted by Catholicguy to narses
On Religion Jul 26 4:06 PM #457 of 509
Even as I sent that, I knew it was a mistake. Perhaps you can't stop yourself from contacting me. That is understandable :) You should see me in person :) So, I propose to help you break the attachment. I will not respond to your continuing personal posts to me. You seem incapable of taking responsibility for your own actions in this area so I will take control. I will not respond to your personal posts to me no matter how many times you send them

You said you would stop, instead you have increased both the quantity and volume of vitriolic attacks against me. They need to stop. You accomplish nothing, you help no one and you embarass yourself.

First, the claim has been made that I posted this thread to harm the Church and cause fear among the faithful. That is false. I posted it because I am interested in the topic and wanted to learn more. I have. Among other things I learned here was that there is reason to believe this allegation, not from the author of this thread alone, but from Dr. Alice von Hildebrand. See the interview with her I posted.

Second, after attacks unrelenting, I am now asking for your help in the fraternal correction of the attacker. I remind you and him of the Catechism:

"2478 To avoid rash judgement, everyone should be careful to interpret insofar as possible his neighbor's thoughts, words, and deeds in a favorable way:

Every good Christian ought to be more ready to give a favorable inerpretation to another's statement than to condemn it. But if he cannot do so, let him ask how the other understands it. Adn if the latter understands it badly, let the former correct him with love. If that does not suffice, let the Christian try all suitable ways to bring the other to a correct interpretation so that he may be saved."

(With gratitude to my friend sitetest who posted this on another thread.)

May God grant each of us the Grace to see His will and to follow, not our own, but His.

. You became a member on 6/22/02. I think your first post came at 5:01. It was an attack on The Magisterium. You attacked the decision of the Roman Curia that speaks in the name of the Pope and you, intentionally or not, mischaracterised the decison of that Curial Office AND you, mistakenly of falsely, accused one of the Churches involved as being heretical. I have since corrected this error publicly at least three times. Sitetest has corected you on the same error. Patent has corrected you on the same error. I have no doubt you still hold your personal opinion to be the correct one and that you reject the decision of the Magisterium. Youhave eeven said the Mass was invalid AFTER the Curia had taken its decision speaking for the Divinely-constitued authority. You may fool some. You haven't fooled me for an instant.

You have been unrelenting since. I went back and checked. You have a pattern of supporting the sspx schism. I have noted that, so has patent and st chuck; others have also, as I recall. Your posts succoring the schism of the sspx are taken from public opponents of the Pope - The Remnant,Catholic Family News, Seattle Catholic etc. You may fool some folks. You do not fool me.

An OVERWHELMING percentage of your posts concerning the Pope or The Magisterium are attacks, some subtle, some bold. You have yet to post a piece defending the Pope in any controversial aspect of his Papacy. You always side with those who cast his actions in a negative light. You may fool some folks. You don't fool me. There ARE perfectly rational and defensible explanations for why the Pope does what he does. You have never posted them. When those explanations ARE posted, from the TCRnews website, you place yourself in opposition to those articles. You may fool some folks. You don't fool me.